What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected
This shows the number of portfolios you hold. Portfolios can be constructed from Unit Trusts & OEICs,IA Unit Trusts & OEICs,Investment Trusts,Pension Funds,Life Funds,Offshore Funds,Exchange Traded Funds and cash. Holdings and acquisition costs can be recorded so that profits/losses can be calculated. These can be calculated in terms of a number of base currencies. Overall portfolio values, as well as portfolio constituents, can be made the subject of alerts.
You have one watchlist, and this shows you the number of items currently stored in the watchlist. Items stored here do not have holdings records, so this list simply monitors the price of items held, which can also be subject to alerts
This is designed to be a temporary collection of items selected by you for further analysis in the tools section. Items can be subsequently transferred from the Basket to the Watchlist or Portfolio.
Understanding the risks associated with this type of investment is equally as important to some investors as identifying the ethical areas in which you want to invest. Are ethical funds more risky than conventional funds and how is performance affected, if at all?
Traditional ethical investing, because of its negative screening methods, is often perceived as a risky investment. Dark green funds tend to exclude larger companies from their portfolio, such as oil and pharmaceuticals, areas that have been known to provide the best gains. They also invest a higher percentage of shares in small to medium sized companies, sometimes considered unpredictable investments. All collective investment funds both ethical and non-ethical have an element of risk. It can alter with your investment choice and the length of time you invest.
New ideas and approaches, the introduction of light green funds for example, are changing the way in which ethical funds are perceived. Fund managers of light green funds have a broader selection of investments to choose from. They may also take advantage of market trends, offering better potential for higher returns. Past performance suggests that some ethical funds have equalled or beaten their conventional counterparts. Although past performance is not necessarily a guide to the future, the new developments to the industry may strengthen this record.
The performance of a Unit Trust or Investment Trust is generally measured against
an index, so investors can easily view the direction of a particular area of the
market in comparison to their chosen fund. A conventional fund and an ethical fund
may both be compared to the same index, for example the FTSE All Share Index. A
conventional fund has many companies to choose from that satisfy its investment
objectives, whereas an ethical fund can be restricted somewhat by negative screening.
As a result some ethical funds may under-perform the benchmark they have been measured
Some groups have indicated a need for a suitable ethical index, while others believe
ethical funds should continue to be compared with mainstream indices to dispel ideas
of under-performance. The FTSE4Good indices, a series set up by FTSE and EIRIS,
have generated equal amounts of praise and criticism since launch in February 2001.
The criteria for stock selection include the environment, universal human rights,
social issues and stakeholder relations. It is the first ethical benchmark to be
set up by an independent body in the UK.
Back to top of page
View all research»
Trustnet mobile website
13:00 | Monday, January 20, 2014
Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority
© Trustnet Limited 2015. All Rights Reserved.
Please read our
Data supplied in conjunction with Thomson Financial Limited, London Stock Exchange
Plc, StructuredRetailProducts.com and ManorPark.com