To continue using this website, please tell us a
little about yourself:

This site uses cookies. Some of the cookies are essential for parts of the site to operate and have already been set. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but if you do, parts of the site may not work. To find out more about cookies on the website and how to delete cookies, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

I accept the FE Trustnet cookie policy

For more information Click here

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 
You are here: Manager factsheet

Jun Tano

Fidelity (FIL Inv Mgt (Luxembo, Fidelity(FIL Invt Svcs UK Ltd)
pdfIcon Manager factsheet pdf    rss feed RSS Feed
FE Trustnet verdict
Overall, performing about the same as the peer group composite. However, over a long track record, the manager has underperformed the peer group more often than not. Stockpicking has made a contribution to results, which have tended to be relatively better in a rising market.
Manager profile
Jun Tano was born in Japan in 1962. He attended the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania where he obtained his MBA. Jun started his career as an analyst for Meiji Life Insurance company in Tokyo in 1986. He became a portfolio manager in 1989 in the American office before joining the London office in 1992. He returned to Tokyo in 1999. Jun joined Fidelity in 2001 as an equity analyst, having previously developed extensive experience of the Japanese equity market. Jun's portfolio management experience now totals almost 16 years and his very strong investment background has already proven beneficial, as Jun has shown himself to be adept at uncovering attractive investment opportunities in the small to mid-cap investment space.
Total return for Jun Tano
 
Rolling Alpha Quartile: Discrete three year periods
Rolling Alpha Quartile shows a manager's alpha score in quartile terms, plotting his or her risk adjusted performance against all other managers in the UT & OEICs universe. The best managers are those who are consistently ranked in the first or second quartile.
 
Quartile 1
Quartile 2
Quartile 3
Quartile 4
 
 
 
 
 
8-44m
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
20-56m
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
32-68m
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
44-80m
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
56-92m
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discrete calendar year performance : Jun Tano

Manager career performance
Discrete performance
  0-12m 12-24m 24-36m 36-48m 48-60m 60-72m 72-84m 84-96m 96-108m 108-120m
Jun Tano 13.0 6.9 23.6 -4.7 12.9 -2.5 17.0 -9.0 -16.3 -
Peer Group Composite 11.9 7.9 26.2 -2.8 6.9 -1.0 10.1 -13.8 -14.1 -
Over / Under 1.1 -1.0 -2.6 -1.9 6.0 -1.5 6.9 4.8 -2.2 -
Performance vs peer group composite: Jun Tano
How a manager matches up against his peers gives you some idea of how talented he is. Very few managers perform equally well in rising and falling markets, so knowing which type of market a manager is capable of performing well within is also important.
 
Overall markets
Up
Outperformed peer group composite
4 years
out of a possible 9
 
Overall markets
Up
Underperformed peer group composite
5 years
out of a possible 9
 
Rising markets
UpDown
Outperformed peer group composite
3 years
out of a possible 5
 
Falling markets
UpDown
Outperformed peer group composite
1 year
out of a possible 4
Funds currently managed
Fund Sole/Co-managed Sector Periods
Fidelity Japan Smaller Companies Lead manager FO Equity - Small Cap Japan since Apr 01 2006 to present
Fidelity Japan Smaller Companies Lead manager UT Japan since Apr 01 2006 to present
Fidelity Japan Advantage Lead manager FO Equity - Japan since Feb 01 2015 to present
Funds managed previously
Fund Periods
No previously managed funds
News & Research: Related articles sector Sector fund Fund group Group manager Manager
Sector So far so good… The best performing trusts of 2015 By Lauren Mason  03-Jul-2015
Data provided by FE. Care has been taken to ensure that the information is correct, but FE neither warrants, represents nor guarantees the contents of information, nor does it accept any responsibility for errors, inaccuracies, omissions or any inconsistencies herein. Past performance does not predict future performance, it should not be the main or sole reason for making an investment decision. The value of investments and any income from them can fall as well as rise.