Your Basket
Your Basket
There are no funds in your basket. To add funds to your basket use the Green Plus Icon wherever you see it next to a fund.
Fund name
Aberdeen American Growth  
Fidelity American  
Schroder UK Mid 250  
M&G Recovery  
Jupiter Merlin UK Growth  
Close Basket Open basket

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 

Trusts for a first-time investor

FE Trustnet looks at three easy-to-understand trusts for those ready to take the plunge and move over to the closed-ended universe.

By Joshua Ausden, News Editor, FE Trustnet Follow
Tuesday August 14, 2012


Discount volatility, gearing and performance fees are just three reasons why retail investors may be put off by investment trusts, and prefer their open-ended rivals instead.

However, certain trusts have simplified their structure, giving investors all the advantages associated with closed-ended funds such as cheaper fees and a longer investment horizon and manager records, without the complications.

Here are three you may wish to consider for your portfolio:


Ruffer Investment Company

FE Alpha Manager Steve Russell’s £279m fund has one of the simplest structures of any investment trust. It does not gear, it charges no performance fee, and management actively strives to keep discount volatility to a minimum through either issuing or buying back shares, depending on whether it is on a discount or premium.

Unlike some other trusts it doesn’t have a specific discount target, but Russell told FE Trustnet in a recent interview that it is likely to act if the premium goes much above 3 per cent.

"We don’t have a limit on the downside, but when the discount went out to 12 per cent in 2007 we bought back shares to get the level down," Russell said.

As well as its simplicity, Ruffer Investment Company’s performance in recent years is also likely to be a selling point.

According to FE data, it has returned 99.4 per cent over five years – more than any other fund in its IT Global sector.

The trust has also been significantly less volatile than its peer group, thanks largely to its above-average exposure to bonds, commodities and other alternatives.

Performance of fund vs sector and index over 5-yrs

ALT_TAG

Source: FE Analytics

Its priority of protecting against the downside means that it is slightly less dominant over three years, since it underperformed its sector average in 2009 and 2010.

In a recent interview with FE Trustnet, Russell said he expected UK inflation to approach the "high single-digits" in the next 10 years due to western governments’ quantitative easing programmes.

As a result, he is cautious on UK, US and European equities and positive on inflation-linked bonds, which have a 30 per cent weighting in the portfolio. He is also overweight Japanese equities, which make up 24 per cent of assets under management.

Ruffer Investment Company has an annual management charge (AMC) of 1 per cent and, as mentioned above, does not charge a performance fee. As of 10 July this year it was trading on a premium of 2.3 per cent and at that time had a three-month historic average of 3 per cent.


Troy Income & Growth

Like Ruffer Investment Company, FE Alpha Manager Francis Brooke’s five crown-rated portfolio has a discount control mechanism (DCM) to help it reach an official target of 0 per cent, and does not charge a performance fee.

In a recent note to investors, its management stated: "Certain funds charge performance fees to their investors if performance is above a certain threshold."

"At Troy we do not charge performance fees. This is consistent with Troy’s desire to keep the cost of investing low and also reflects a concern that performance fees can distort the way funds are run, encouraging managers to take excessive risks."

Brooke says one of the first things management did when taking over the trust in August 2009 was install a DCM, in the same mould as Sebastian Lyon’s top-performing Personal Assets Trust. As of 10 July 2012, Troy Income & Growth was trading on a slight premium of 0.9 per cent.

Performance of fund vs sector and index since August 2009

ALT_TAG

Source: FE Analytics

The £89m portfolio has prospered under the management of Brooke, returning 75.16 per cent compared with 43.25 per cent from the All Share.

It has also been significantly less volatile than its benchmark and protected more effectively against the downside in last August’s slump. It has a yield of 3.6 per cent and a TER of 1.1 per cent.

It is not currently geared, though the manager has not ruled out moving in this direction in the future.


Aberdeen Asian Income IT

The £288m trust is one of the few with an emerging-market focus that does not charge a performance fee; instead it has a simple TER of 1.4 per cent. This is another portfolio that uses a DCM, this time aiming for a premium/discount between 5 and -5 per cent. According to data from the AIC, it is currently trading on a premium of 4.6 per cent.

The fund can use gearing, which is currently at 4.6 per cent of AUM. This level can go to a maximum of 25 per cent, but the manager is forbidden from taking out any fixed, long-term loans.

The five crown-rated trust has been one of the best performers of the last five years in its IT Asia Pacific ex Japan sector, delivering 147.49 per cent over this time.

It is also top quartile over three years, with returns of 92.9 per cent. Aberdeen Asian Income IT is currently yielding 3.6 per cent.



 
Add your comment
Step 1: Tell us what you think...
 

Step 2: Prove you're not a robot...
You don't have to do this every time you submit a comment.

Login or register free and you won't see it again.
Enter the words above:
Step 3: Submit your comment...
Submit
 
Malcolm Mattok Aug 14th, 2012 at 06:15 PM

I believe Troy Asset Management only took over responsibility for the fund in 2009 (formerly Glasgow Income Trust), so the performance before that date is more irrelevant for performance comparison purposes.

Reply
Satish Mittal Aug 14th, 2012 at 05:38 PM

I find this misleading. You show Ruffer since 2007 but Troy since 2009. Why not since 2007. It dropped 50% and has not recovered as yet.

Reply
The FE Trustnet team Aug 14th, 2012 at 06:11 PM

Satish,

The reason the Troy graph only goes back to 2009 is because this is when Francis Brooke took over as manager. The entire investment process changed as a result.

Many thanks,

The FE Trustnet team

Reply
David Andrew Aug 14th, 2012 at 02:33 PM

Another consideration, I think Ruffer (RICA) does not attract 0.5% stamp duty, (due to its domicile?). You might like to confirm this....

Reply
Ark Welder Aug 14th, 2012 at 03:25 PM

Both RICA and AAIF are incorporated in the Channel Islands, therefore neither attract stamp duty. However, I would not take this into consideration when chosing between ITs - always go with the investment mandate.

Reply
 

Back to top of page

 

Follow FE Trustnet

Video Headlines

More Videos

Gray: Market rally has made me more bearish than ever

GMT 15:30 | 30-Apr-2013

From the analyst's desk

GMT 10:00 | 29-Apr-2013

 
Poll

Would you be concerned if a manager of a fund you owned took charge of another portfolio as well?

Yes

No

Vote

 
 
  • Stay connected with FE trustnet
  • Authorised and Regulated by the
    Financial Services Authority
  • © Trustnet Limited 2013. All Rights Reserved.
  • Please read our Terms of Use / Disclaimer
    and Privacy and Cookie Policy.
  • Data supplied in conjunction with Thomson Financial Limited,
    London Stock Exchange Plc, StructuredRetailProducts.com
    and ManorPark.com