Your Basket
Your Basket
There are no funds in your basket. To add funds to your basket use the Green Plus Icon wherever you see it next to a fund.
Fund name
Aberdeen American Growth  
Fidelity American  
Schroder UK Mid 250  
M&G Recovery  
Jupiter Merlin UK Growth  
Close Basket Open basket

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 

Hidden risk in ETFs revealed

No organisation publishes sales figures for ETFs in the UK, meaning there is a lack of transparency around these increasingly popular products.

By Thomas McMahon, Reporter, FE Trustnet Follow
Tuesday August 14, 2012


The lack of publicly available information on the sales of exchange traded funds (ETFs) in the UK is putting investors in these products at a serious disadvantage, according to Tim Cockerill, head of collectives research at Rowan Dartington.

ALT_TAGThe Investment Management Association (IMA) publishes monthly statistics on sales of funds to retail investors and institutions. However, there are no equivalent figures available for ETFs, which Cockerill (pictured) thinks harms investors’ decision making.

"You really need a central trade body like the IMA to look at this," he said. "I have no doubt that the providers have that sort of information." 

"Is there a different type of investor buying ETFs? Do the flows into certain sectors show the same patterns or are they different? We can’t know." 

"If ETFs are being bought mainly by institutions you may even see that they are doing something very different from retail investors with their money. It may even be that an institution is selling a fixed income product, for example, while putting its own money elsewhere."

ETFs are advertised as a low-cost method of gaining access to markets. Many expect the Retail Distribution Review (RDR) to accelerate the take-up of the products, as investors who are unwilling to pay higher fees for advice look to lower their costs.

Adrian Lowcock, senior adviser at Bestinvest, says that he is seeing a growing interest from retail investors, even though the industry is very underdeveloped and information is hard to come by.

"In the UK this is still an industry in its infancy," he said. "If you go to a stockbroker and try to find an ETF it’s hard to even be sure you’ve got the right one, as they basically just give you a list of names." 

"The problem is they’re so easy to create, it only takes 20 minutes or so once you have an idea." 

"The key thing is that with so much money going into them there’s the risk of the collapse of one provider or of a mis-selling scandal." 

BlackRock – which provides ETFs under the iShares brand – publishes a large amount of information to the public and was happy to provide FE Trustnet with additional data for this article. 

Its monthly figures show the amount of money flowing into ETFs listed in Europe, but don’t provide a breakdown for the UK. They also fail to show any analysis of retail and institutional investors. 

Similar data to BlackRock’s is available from other private companies, but investors and analysts who want to track where other market participants are putting their money have no organisation like the IMA to turn to for further information. 

According to figures provided to FE Trustnet by BlackRock, there is currently $110.3bn (£70.27bn) invested in UK-listed ETFs, with net inflows of €1.551bn (£0.99bn) into the products in July. 

This is almost equivalent to twice the total sales of all UK-domiciled unit trusts and OEICs in June, underlining the popularity of these products. 

Sales of ETFs and funds in 2012

  Net flows into UK-listed ETPs (£m)  Net sales of UK domiciled Unit Trust/OIECs (£m) 
Jan 1616  1232 
Feb 1040  1873 
Mar 1780  1688 
Apr 729  873 
May 267  -167 
Jun 757  514 
Jul 989  Not available 

Source: BlackRock – ETP Research, Bloomberg / IMA 

BlackRock’s figures also show that whereas unit trusts and OEICs saw net outflows in May this year, ETFs have experienced consistent inflows. 

Lowcock added: "We rate a few, in particular some iShares products. The problem our analysts have found when researching them is they are very complicated and you need a lot of information to understand them." 

In July, Standard Life global thematic strategist Frances Hudson told FE Trustnet she believed that retail investors who hold the products were inadequately informed about them.



 
Add your comment
Step 1: Tell us what you think...
 

Step 2: Prove you're not a robot...
You don't have to do this every time you submit a comment.

Login or register free and you won't see it again.
Enter the words above:
Step 3: Submit your comment...
Submit
 
Ark Welder Aug 15th, 2012 at 01:22 AM

Strange, that what is easy to explain has never been explained by those who believe in transparency of costs. I wonder why...

Reply
Cambion Aug 15th, 2012 at 12:05 AM

The zero percent is easy to explain if you take more than a cursory glance.

You get the benchmark. They make money by magic with swaps.

Personally I think the counter-party risk in synthetic ETFs is massively overblown too.

ETFs are great if you deal in values that make the trading fee small and do so in markets that EHM applies (E.g. the UK or US)

Reply
Theo Aug 14th, 2012 at 07:41 PM


ETFs do not have the equivalent of IMA because they do not have the huge charges of UTs, or undisclosed charges to cover up.

Roan Darlington complained of lack of inforation on the split in sales between private and institutional, which he saw fit to call transparency, not of risk. That word is from your good self.

Reply
Ark Welder Aug 14th, 2012 at 08:46 PM

The db X-trackers EURIO STOXX 50 ETF reports a TER of zero percent. Explain that, without including the phrase 'undisclosed charges'!

Reply
David Martin Livermore Aug 14th, 2012 at 07:18 PM

Biggest risk is to fund managers' fee income methinks, though the punter does need to grasp the difference between 'physical' and 'synthetic'.

Reply
 

Back to top of page

 

Follow FE Trustnet

Video Headlines

More Videos

Gleeson: The fund I’d back to hit a short-term target

GMT 07:00 | 15-May-2013

Gray: Market rally has made me more bearish than ever

GMT 15:30 | 30-Apr-2013

 
Poll

Do you own an Asia Pacific ex Japan fund that isn't run by Aberdeen or First State?

Yes

No

Vote

 
 
  • Stay connected with FE trustnet
  • Authorised and Regulated by the
    Financial Conduct Authority
  • © Trustnet Limited 2013. All Rights Reserved.
  • Please read our Terms of Use / Disclaimer
    and Privacy and Cookie Policy.
  • Data supplied in conjunction with Thomson Financial Limited,
    London Stock Exchange Plc, StructuredRetailProducts.com
    and ManorPark.com