Your Basket
Your Basket
There are no funds in your basket. To add funds to your basket use the Green Plus Icon wherever you see it next to a fund.
Fund name
Aberdeen American Growth  
Fidelity American  
Schroder UK Mid 250  
M&G Recovery  
Jupiter Merlin UK Growth  
Close Basket Open basket

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 

Cholwill upstages UK Equity Income stars

The RLAM manager has delivered more consistent medium-term performance than the likes of Neil Woodford, Francis Brooke and John McClure.

By Jenna Voigt , Features Editor, FE Trustnet
Monday September 10, 2012


Martin Cholwill’s £290m Royal London UK Equity Income fund is the only fund to have outperformed the UK Equity Income sector average in each of the last six calendar years, according to FE data.

ALT_TAGWhile a number of top-rated UK Equity Income managers tend to outperform in down markets but fall short when they rally – such as Neil Woodford – and others shoot the lights out in up markets but struggle during down periods – such as John McClure – Cholwill (pictured) has managed to beat his rivals across various market conditions. 

The RLAM UK Equity Income portfolio has a yield of 4.29 per cent, on par with that of the FTSE All Share index. According to FE Analytics, the average yield for the sector is 4.49 per cent. 

It has outperformed its sector in each of the past six calendar years by at least 1 per cent, with the exception of 2008 when it still beat the average fund but lost 28.18 per cent.

Year-on-year performance of fund vs sector

  2012 returns (%)  2011 returns (%)    2010 returns (%)    2009 returns (%)    2008 returns (%)    2007 returns (%)    2006 returns (%)  
IMA UK Equity Income  10.30  -2.90  14.58  22.88  -28.54  -1.21  18.19 
Royal London UK Equity Income  14.89  -1.86  17.30  25.60  -28.18  0.80 19.74 

Source: FE Analytics

By comparison, Invesco Perpetual Income sustained a loss of 19.94 per cent in 2008, while McClure’s Unicorn UK Income fund, which typically outperforms in rising markets, shed 32.76 per cent. 

Royal London UK Equity Income then significantly outperformed the sector in 2009 and 2010 as markets bounced back from the financial crisis, but Woodford fell well short. 

Year to date, the RLAM fund has delivered 14.89 per cent, while the Invesco fund has lagged the sector average of 10.3 per cent, bringing in 7.01 per cent. 

As markets have relaxed in recent months following more decisive action from central banks, particularly the European Central Bank's (ECB) bond-buying programme announced last week, the Unicorn UK Income fund has outperformed over the short-term, returning 19.32 per cent year to date. 

Darius McDermott, managing director of Chelsea Financial Services, rates Cholwill’s fund highly and says performance has been steady during the manager's tenure. 

"Martin has done a really good job for RLAM and the fund is certainly on our reserve list," he commented. 

"It is first quartile over one, three and five years. Martin has done a tidy job. The Equity Income fund is one we could well look at if we need to move something onto our buy-list." 



Performance of fund vs sector over 5-yrs

ALT_TAG

Source: FE Analytics

Woodford’s Invesco Perptual Income fund currently has £9.3bn in assets under management (AUM), making it significantly less flexible than Cholwill’s, as well as Unicorn’s £50.4m fund, which has more of a small cap focus. 

While Cholwill has a high weighting to blue-chip stocks in his portfolio – AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline and BP are all top-10 holdings – he has used this flexibility to invest further down the market cap spectrum.

Smaller FTSE 100 companies Severn Trent, Pennon Group and Hargreaves Lansdown are among his biggest positions. 

With a minimum investment of £1,000 and a minimum top-up of £100, Royal London UK Equity Income is tailored for retail investors. 

It has a total expense ratio (TER) of 1.32 per cent, making it among the cheapest in the entire UK Equity Income sector.



 
Add your comment
Step 1: Tell us what you think...
 

Step 2: Prove you're not a robot...
You don't have to do this every time you submit a comment.

Login or register free and you won't see it again.
Enter the words above:
Step 3: Submit your comment...
Submit
 
Theo Sep 10th, 2012 at 05:31 PM

Congratulations to Chelsea Financial for this study. Well reported too.

Until now I thought all CF were interested in was to tell us that fund charges did not matter, one got what one paid for and we should gladly pay anything the fund houses cared to charge!

For their interest I checked the TERs of the funds in the red list and found that 3 of the worst 4 funds (and 30% of the total), had TERs above 2.00%, placing them in the outrageous class. I also remember some TN studies which found higher charging funds were under perforing.

It would be good if IFA firms who send their "heads of research(!)" to tell us such nonsense, did some "research" on their figures first, before opening their mouths and making fools of themselves. It does them no good to antagonise their customers either.

Reply
Theo Sep 10th, 2012 at 05:40 PM

Sorry, the above comment was meant for the article headed "Giant Fund Houses Should Drop Underperformers" I hope the TN team can correct it.

Reply
 

Back to top of page

 

Follow FE Trustnet

Video Headlines

More Videos

Gray: Market rally has made me more bearish than ever

GMT 15:30 | 30-Apr-2013

From the analyst's desk

GMT 10:00 | 29-Apr-2013

 
Poll

Would you be concerned if a manager of a fund you owned took charge of another portfolio as well?

Yes

No

Vote

 
 
  • Stay connected with FE trustnet
  • Authorised and Regulated by the
    Financial Services Authority
  • © Trustnet Limited 2013. All Rights Reserved.
  • Please read our Terms of Use / Disclaimer
    and Privacy and Cookie Policy.
  • Data supplied in conjunction with Thomson Financial Limited,
    London Stock Exchange Plc, StructuredRetailProducts.com
    and ManorPark.com