Your Basket
Your Basket
There are no funds in your basket. To add funds to your basket use the Green Plus Icon wherever you see it next to a fund.
Fund name
Aberdeen American Growth  
Fidelity American  
Schroder UK Mid 250  
M&G Recovery  
Jupiter Merlin UK Growth  
Close Basket Open basket

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 

Equity Income giants playing a dangerous game, says Moore

The Standard Life manager claims the big defensive companies favoured by the likes of Neil Woodford may not be as safe as many investors think.

By Thomas McMahon, Reporter, FE Trustnet Follow
Thursday September 13, 2012


A blanket approach to large cap dividend-paying stocks is sucking cautious investors into companies with shaky earnings forecasts, according to Thomas Moore, manager of the Standard Life Equity Income trust.

ALT_TAG Moore (pictured) has been shifting the focus of the trust onto mid and small cap stocks since he took over in November of last year and says a belief that certain blue chip stocks are overbought is a central theme. 

FE Trustnet has previously carried warnings about the growing risk to investors from the amount of money pouring into a few big dividend-payers, and Moore says these fears are well-founded. 

"The concentration risk if a left-field event hits the sector could be extreme. We’ve already seen serious unexpected events in the banking sector in 07/08 when they cut their dividends and we saw a similar event with BP. There’s a clear benefit to having dividends more spread." 

He explains that the large cap defensives favoured by UK Equity Income funds have weaker potential for increasing their dividends, and several have suffered earnings downgrades in recent months. 

This means investors seeking income would be better served by mid and small cap stocks with strong growth potential, which would support future dividend yields. 

"There are powerful reasons people aren’t selling those defensive stocks, but they should be asking why they are holding companies that are suffering earnings downgrades like Vodafone," Moore added.

Data from FE Analytics shows Standard Life Equity Income's share price has underperformed its sector average since Moore took over in November, returning 7.22 per cent to investors, although its NAV has grown by 10.94 per cent. 

Performance of trust vs sector since Nov 2011

ALT_TAG

Source: FE Analytics

The discount is partly due to an unexpected sell-off by one major investor over the summer; however, Moore says this makes it the perfect time to buy into the trust. 

The portfolio has become less concentrated since the manager took over and currently has 48 per cent of its assets under management in its top-10, compared with 53.5 per cent for the benchmark. 

Moore has also cut its exposure to certain equity income favourites such as Vodafone. 

"We have reduced our holding but it’s still 9.2 per cent, which perfectly captures the dilemma we have: how can you avoid such a large part of the market with a yield of 7.5 per cent?" 

"We hope to reduce our holding further in future as we find smaller alternatives." 

Moore explains that Vodafone is suffering from over-exposure to the eurozone and potentially from industry changes that make the products it sells – such as data deals – cheaper and cheaper.

One of his largest underweight sectors is the mining industry, which he says is an example of a consensus view leading to trouble. 

"Mining companies got caught out by believing in the super-cycle too long and there are examples of them now being over-exposed, having started too many mines. We don’t hold much in mining companies, as they are a big macro bet." 

Steve Russell of the Ruffer Investment Company told FE Trustnet in August that he feared a bubble was forming in IMA UK Equity Income, but Moore says although he agrees with the thrust of the warning, the sector still has some advantages. 

"I wouldn’t say it’s a bubble, because it depends on what you are looking for as a manager. If you are an income manager you can still see the case for putting money in stocks yielding 4 per cent. If you are an asset allocator like Ruffer then perhaps it’s different." 

"I would say that maybe the bubble is in government bonds, not in those stocks, which at least have strong earnings and balance sheets behind them."



 
Add your comment
Step 1: Tell us what you think...
 

Step 2: Prove you're not a robot...
You don't have to do this every time you submit a comment.

Login or register free and you won't see it again.
Enter the words above:
Step 3: Submit your comment...
Submit
 
david horner Sep 13th, 2012 at 05:23 PM

Unfortunately I invested in Equity life bonds of Standard Life and the return has been negligible.
Though I do have Their Smaller companies investment Trust which has performed well.
Moral Dont invest in these large management companies go direct

Reply
Theo Sep 13th, 2012 at 12:59 PM

So much of More's theorising. Now all he has to do is translate theory into practice and then we shall take him seriously.

Reply
 

Back to top of page

 

Follow FE Trustnet

Video Headlines

More Videos

Gleeson: The fund I’d back to hit a short-term target

GMT 07:00 | 15-May-2013

Gray: Market rally has made me more bearish than ever

GMT 15:30 | 30-Apr-2013

 
Poll

Do you own an Asia Pacific ex Japan fund that isn't run by Aberdeen or First State?

Yes

No

Vote

 
 
  • Stay connected with FE trustnet
  • Authorised and Regulated by the
    Financial Conduct Authority
  • © Trustnet Limited 2013. All Rights Reserved.
  • Please read our Terms of Use / Disclaimer
    and Privacy and Cookie Policy.
  • Data supplied in conjunction with Thomson Financial Limited,
    London Stock Exchange Plc, StructuredRetailProducts.com
    and ManorPark.com