Your Basket
Your Basket
There are no funds in your basket. To add funds to your basket use the Green Plus Icon wherever you see it next to a fund.
Fund name
Aberdeen American Growth  
Fidelity American  
Schroder UK Mid 250  
M&G Recovery  
Jupiter Merlin UK Growth  
Close Basket Open basket

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 

McDonald: Why I’ve ditched Woodford for Shah

The co-head of multi-manager at Cazenove is still a big fan of the Invesco Perpetual man, but thinks his style is out of favour.

By Joshua Ausden, News Editor, FE Trustnet Follow
Wednesday September 19, 2012


The time to hold defensively focused star managers such as Neil Woodford, Angus Tulloch and James Findlay has passed, according to Cazenove’s Robin McDonald (pictured), who thinks there is far better value in the cyclical market.

ALT_TAGMcDonald, co-manager of multi-manager at the firm, held all three managers last year, and continues to rate them highly; however, he says previously out-of-favour managers such as Fidelity’s Sanjeev Shah, GLG’s Stephen Harker and Chris Rice are better suited to the current macro environment. 

"Safety has been key for the last few years, but now I think this area is overpriced," he commented. 

"In 2011 it paid to be cautious, but since the fourth quarter of last year where cyclicals began to look cheap, I’ve moved out of the likes of Woodford and into Shah." 

The manager believes the vast amounts of money that have poured into quality dividend-paying UK companies have put them on too big a premium and has sold out as a result. 

"We no longer have any money in Neil Woodford across our portfolios," he confirmed. 

Even if the markets fall, McDonald doubts whether defensive managers will be able to protect against the downside as effectively as they have in the past.

If there is a significant sell-off in equities, he says the most expensive companies on high price-to-earnings ratios are likely to be hit harder than cheap stocks that have already suffered falls.

Performance of managers over 3-yrs

ALT_TAG

Source: FE Analytics

Over the last three years, Woodford has significantly outperformed the more cyclically focused Shah, with less volatility. Woodford has returned 35.33 per cent compared to Shah’s 5.95 per cent over the period. 

However, McDonald is confident the tide is about to turn in the Fidelity manager’s favour.

This trend has already been evident since McDonald took on a more cyclical focus at the beginning of the fourth quarter of last year. 

Since 1 October 2011, Shah has returned 20.86 per cent, beating Woodford by 5.79 percentage points.


Performance of managers over 1-yr

ALT_TAG

Source: FE Analytics 

Cazenove’s view is in direct opposition to the Jupiter Merlin team, which continues to back defensively focused funds such as Invesco Perpetual High Income, Artemis Income and M&G Global Dividend across its multi-billion pound range. 

McDonald is responsible for more the £1.3bn of assets at Cazenove. His biggest fund is the £903mCazenove Multi Manager Diversity portfolio, which sits in the IMA Mixed Investment 20-60% Shares sector. 

According to FE data, McDonald has returned 11.43 per cent since taking over his first investment portfolio back in September 2007 – more than twice as much as his peer group composite, with less volatility.  He has also outperformed over one and three years.

Performance of manager vs peer group

Name  1-yr returns (%)  3-yr returns (%)    Returns since Sept 2007 (%) 
Robin McDonald   10.84  21.69  11.43 
Peer group composite   8.99  20.01  5.16 

Source: FE Analytics

The Cazenove Multi Manager Diversity fund is a top-quartile performer over five years, with returns of 23.52 per cent. 

He heads up Cazenove’s multi-manager range with Marcus Brookes, who was formerly at Gartmore.

The Diversity fund has a minimum investment of £1,000 and a total expense ratio (TER) of 1.8 per cent. Fidelity Special Situations, GLG Japan Core Alpha and Cazenove European Income are among the fund’s top-10 holdings.



 
Add your comment
Step 1: Tell us what you think...
 

Step 2: Prove you're not a robot...
You don't have to do this every time you submit a comment.

Login or register free and you won't see it again.
Enter the words above:
Step 3: Submit your comment...
Submit
 
northerngooner Mar 04th, 2013 at 09:19 AM

I kept this article as I thought it a little outlandish of Robin to dare suggest dumping the Woodfordmeister........the man who is ALWAYS right (eventually)but Robin was right.....makes those who have knee jerk reactions look a little silly - well done Robin

Reply
Theo Sep 19th, 2012 at 02:13 PM

Mc Donald is fortunate in being able to indulge his fancies with other people's money.

And since multi-manager funds are for the gullible and uninformed he will be able to get away with it.

Reply
Ark Welder Sep 19th, 2012 at 05:40 PM

You are confusing multi-manager with fund-of fund. For instance, both Invesco Perpetual's Distribution, and Monthly Income Plus funds are multi-manager, but they are not fund-of-funds. TER's 1.57% and 1.44% respectively.

Reply
IFA Sep 19th, 2012 at 02:00 PM

Spot on Jim.

I have Invesco High Income and Threadneedle UK Equity Income, mixed with Liontrust Special Situations, Cazenove UK Opportunities and Axa Framlington UK Select Opportunities for my UK presence.

Reply
Tony H Sep 19th, 2012 at 01:59 PM

As Jim says below, a well diversified portfolio is key and this should include both growth and income orientated funds / different asset classes and geographical diversity

Reply
Jim Aitkenhead Sep 19th, 2012 at 01:35 PM

Over two decades Woodford has made more money for more of my clients than any other manager.

Defensives have had a good run, but I'm not at all convinced that growth stocks are about to make a big comeback. Maybe it would be sensible to hold some of both?

Reply
 

Back to top of page

 

Follow FE Trustnet

Video Headlines

More Videos

Gray: Market rally has made me more bearish than ever

GMT 15:30 | 30-Apr-2013

From the analyst's desk

GMT 10:00 | 29-Apr-2013

 
Poll

Would you be concerned if a manager of a fund you owned took charge of another portfolio as well?

Yes

No

Vote

 
 
  • Stay connected with FE trustnet
  • Authorised and Regulated by the
    Financial Services Authority
  • © Trustnet Limited 2013. All Rights Reserved.
  • Please read our Terms of Use / Disclaimer
    and Privacy and Cookie Policy.
  • Data supplied in conjunction with Thomson Financial Limited,
    London Stock Exchange Plc, StructuredRetailProducts.com
    and ManorPark.com