Your Basket
Your Basket
There are no funds in your basket. To add funds to your basket use the Green Plus Icon wherever you see it next to a fund.
Fund name
Aberdeen American Growth  
Fidelity American  
Schroder UK Mid 250  
M&G Recovery  
Jupiter Merlin UK Growth  
Close Basket Open basket

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 

Most consistent funds of the decade: Global

FE Trustnet takes a look at those funds that have consistently delivered the goods in the popular IMA Global sector.

By Jenna Voigt, Features Editor
Friday October 05, 2012


Nine funds in the IMA Global sector have achieved top-quartile performance in the two consecutive five-year periods since 2002, according to FE Trustnet research.

This means that, over the 10-year time period, it is the second most consistent sector of all those studied in the series so far, behind the similarly sized IMA UK All Companies

The £5bn M&G Global Basics fund topped the charts in the IMA Global sector between October 2002 and October 2007.
ALT_TAG
FE Alpha Manager Graham French (pictured) has also managed to keep the fund in the top-quartile over the vastly different market conditions in the five years since 2007. 

Other notable retail funds to achieve top-quartile rankings over both periods include the M&G Global Growth and Invesco Perpetual Global Smaller Companies funds, both run by FE Alpha Managers.

Alongside these standout names is the little-known £37.5m McInroy & Wood Smaller Companies fund, headed up by FE Alpha manager Tim Wood, and the £136m Newton Falcon fund, run by Robert Hay – also an FE Alpha Manager. 

The McInroy & Wood fund is not listed on any platforms, but is available directly with a minimum investment of £10,000.

It delivered the second-best returns between 2002 and 2007 and outshone the M&G Global Basics portfolio over the latter five-year period, bringing in 41.99 per cent compared with a sector average of 4.91 per cent. 

Performance of funds over 10-yrs

Name Returns Oct 2002 - Oct 2007 (%) Returns Oct 2007 - Oct 2012 (%) 10yr return (%)
M&G Global Basics 243.57 16.27 297.22
McInroy & Wood Smaller Companies 176.19 41.99 292.15
FF Global Industrials 168.49 14.99 204.06
M&G Global Growth 166.96 17.62 210.36
Inv Perpetual Global Smaller Companies 162.86 23.42 220.18
Newton Falcon 146.28 28.52 216.51
Ecclesiastical Amity International 143.72 20.98 192.65
CF Odey Opus 133.24 18.17 175.63
Jupiter Merlin Worldwide Portfolio 131.9 16.23 167.38

Source: FE Analytics

The four crown-rated fund carries a TER of 1.61 per cent, while the M&G fund is more affordable for retail investors, with a minimum investment of £500 and a TER of 1.67 per cent. 

There was also a place for the highly rated Jupiter Merlin Worldwide Portfolio, and the ethically focused Ecclesiastical Amity International fund, headed up by Robin Hepworth.

Richard Troue, investment analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, says M&G Global Basics has been a consistent outperformer over the long-term, in spite of occasional periods of increased volatility due to exposure in the mining sector. 

He says the fund has had a harder time recently, but points out that it is poised to bounce back on the heels of QE3.

“We like it quite a lot actually,” Troue said.

“The manager is doing something quite simple in that he is investing in companies that benefit from global economic development. On the whole it is a good core fund you need to tuck away for the long-term.” 

Troue adds that the McInroy & Wood Smaller Companies fund has an excellent track record in an area in which it has been traditionally difficult to choose consistently outperforming stocks. 

“Smaller companies funds are generally underowned by the majority. Often those with a long-term horizon turn to emerging markets and forget smaller companies are capable of equally spectacular returns.”

Of the 243 funds in the sector, 107 have a 10-year track record. 



 
Add your comment
Step 1: Tell us what you think...
 

Step 2: Prove you're not a robot...
You don't have to do this every time you submit a comment.

Login or register free and you won't see it again.
Enter the words above:
Step 3: Submit your comment...
Submit
 
Theo Oct 05th, 2012 at 03:12 PM

It would have been very useful for the above table to have another column showing the dividends paid, because some of us prefer a tangible benefit from our investment more often than once in 10 years.

Be that as it may, the results of performance over the two periods show no correlation what so ever. It is there for fair to assume that the next 5yr period will show no correlation either.

Chasing consistency of performance from what are essentially random results is an amusing past time, but let us not take it too seriously.

Reply
 

Back to top of page

 

Follow FE Trustnet

Video Headlines

More Videos

Gray: Market rally has made me more bearish than ever

GMT 15:30 | 30-Apr-2013

From the analyst's desk

GMT 10:00 | 29-Apr-2013

 
Poll

Would you be concerned if a manager of a fund you owned took charge of another portfolio as well?

Yes

No

Vote

 
 
  • Stay connected with FE trustnet
  • Authorised and Regulated by the
    Financial Services Authority
  • © Trustnet Limited 2013. All Rights Reserved.
  • Please read our Terms of Use / Disclaimer
    and Privacy and Cookie Policy.
  • Data supplied in conjunction with Thomson Financial Limited,
    London Stock Exchange Plc, StructuredRetailProducts.com
    and ManorPark.com