Your Basket
Your Basket
There are no funds in your basket. To add funds to your basket use the Green Plus Icon wherever you see it next to a fund.
Fund name
Aberdeen American Growth  
Fidelity American  
Schroder UK Mid 250  
M&G Recovery  
Jupiter Merlin UK Growth  
Close Basket Open basket

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 

Don’t fall victim to short-termism in equities, warns Barron

Investors are in danger of being too short-term in their view of equities, according to an investment trust expert.

By Alex Paget, Reporter
Wednesday October 17, 2012


Investors are in danger of being too short-term in their view of equities, according to JP Morgan's David Barron, who says historical lessons illustrate the importance of ignoring immediate macro concerns and concentrating on the long-term.

In spite of the various macro headwinds facing equity investors at the moment, Barron, head of investment trusts at the firm, thinks you only have to look back 25 years to see the merits of being patient and holding on to your investments.

Barron believes that Black Monday on the 19 October 1987 – almost a quarter of a century to the day – shows that if you take equities for their true long term value, periods of economic uncertainty, such as the current environment, are only a blip on the radar.

The investment trust manager urges equity investors not to get too hung up on the timing of a rally and focus instead on finding sustainable investments for the long term.

“The important lesson for long-term equity investors is to stay invested through the ups and downs,” he said. “It is very hard to time entry and exit points accurately, and the best days of returns often come soon after the worst days.”

He continued: “Over the long term, if you pick good funds and managers, diversify your asset allocation and reinvest your dividends, you are unlikely to go wrong.”

While many at the time believed Black Monday was the end of the world in financial terms as share prices dropped to seriously low levels across the globe, Barron thinks its significance is now very limited.

“Although there was a feeling of panic around Black Monday, looking back on it now, it was a small blip in overall equity market performance,” he said.

“Markets have periods of excessive discounting of future earnings and periods of over-optimism, but as very long-term data sets like the Barclays Capital Equity Gilt study show, ultimately, there is a reversion to fair value.”

“The overall trend is for equities to do better than cash or gilts for long-term investors.”

His comments come in light of research compiled by JP Morgan Asset Management, which tracked the performance of their investment trusts since ‘Black Monday’. 

According to the research, if you had made an investment in the JP Morgan American Investment Trust a few weeks before ‘Black Monday’, you would have lost 33.12 per cent by the end of October 1987. 

However, you would have made your money back by June 1989 and if you had held the trust until the end of August this year, you would have made 743.72 per cent on your original investment.

Comparably, the FTSE 100 has returned 826.59 per cent since the start of 1987, according to FE Analytics. As the graph below shows, Black Monday is barely even visibly in the grand scheme of things.

Performance of FTSE 100 since Jan 1987

ALT_TAG 
Source: FE Analytics

Barron also believes that investors should consider the tax benefits of investing in equities over a long period of time.

“It is worth remembering that 1987 was also the year that personal equity plans, or PEPs, were introduced, giving the opportunity to own shares and funds in a tax-favoured wrapper, so investors would have had the chance of largely tax-free income and gains since Black Monday, too,” he said.



 
Add your comment
Step 1: Tell us what you think...
 

Step 2: Prove you're not a robot...
You don't have to do this every time you submit a comment.

Login or register free and you won't see it again.
Enter the words above:
Step 3: Submit your comment...
Submit
 
Neil Lovatt Oct 19th, 2012 at 11:05 AM

This is a bad case of survivorship bias. Also whilst it rightly notes that equities have a greater probability of beating bonds over the long term it fails to note the potential severity of loss when they don't. There is no term diversification with equities and the risk of holding them doesn't decay with time. A casual glance at option pricing proves that point.

Reply
Mickey Oct 17th, 2012 at 11:22 PM

Brief article but very true and perhaps timely.

Reply
Ark Welder Oct 17th, 2012 at 07:26 PM

Didn't it also take about 25 years for the Dow to finally surpass its 1929 peak-before-crash? All in nominal terms, not sure about real terms given the bouts of deflation during the period.

Reply
jonuk76 Oct 18th, 2012 at 02:17 PM

Yes that's certainly true on a price return basis. I haven't seen a total return version of the Dow over that period, but it's always worth remembering that over the long term re-invested dividends make up a large chunk of equity returns.

Reply
Ark Welder Oct 18th, 2012 at 10:40 PM

Total return figures are difficult to find. I have found the daily closing prices, and using these and assuming a constant 4% for re-invested dividends, I calculate that it still took around 19 years for the total return to pass the 1929 peak.

Method: take the percentage difference between the closing values 1 year apart (or the next business day), add 4% and apply to the earlier year's total-return value - which in the first year would be the same as the peak value.

Looking at a chart of the DJIA, though, its pattern since the late 1990's looks more similar to the period from 1966 to 1982 than it does to either 1987 or the 1930s, i.e. sideways with volatility.

Reply
 

Back to top of page

 

Follow FE Trustnet

Video Headlines

More Videos

Gleeson: The fund I’d back to hit a short-term target

GMT 07:00 | 15-May-2013

Gray: Market rally has made me more bearish than ever

GMT 15:30 | 30-Apr-2013

 
Poll

Do you own an Asia Pacific ex Japan fund that isn't run by Aberdeen or First State?

Yes

No

Vote

 
 
  • Stay connected with FE trustnet
  • Authorised and Regulated by the
    Financial Conduct Authority
  • © Trustnet Limited 2013. All Rights Reserved.
  • Please read our Terms of Use / Disclaimer
    and Privacy and Cookie Policy.
  • Data supplied in conjunction with Thomson Financial Limited,
    London Stock Exchange Plc, StructuredRetailProducts.com
    and ManorPark.com