Your Basket
Your Basket
There are no funds in your basket. To add funds to your basket use the Green Plus Icon wherever you see it next to a fund.
Fund name
Aberdeen American Growth  
Fidelity American  
Schroder UK Mid 250  
M&G Recovery  
Jupiter Merlin UK Growth  
Close Basket Open basket

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 

Scottish Oriental trust’s performance fee “far from ideal”, admits First State

The five crown-rated investment trust has seen its annual cost increase from 1.01 per cent to 2.28 per cent over the last year as a result of its performance fee.

By Joshua Ausden, News Editor, FE Trustnet Follow
Tuesday October 30, 2012


First State has admitted that the large cap dominated MSCI AC Asia ex Japan index is "far from ideal" as a benchmark for its Scottish Oriental Smaller Companies trust’s performance fee.

Susie Rippingall’s £226m portfolio, which will be taken over by FE Alpha Manager Angus Tulloch next year, charges 10 per cent on top of anything upwards of the index plus 10 percentage points, based on the rolling three-year total return figure. 

A spokesperson for First State admitted the benchmark is far from a perfect fit given the small cap focus of the trust, but says the board has no viable alternative.  

"From inception in March 1995 until October 1999, the trust adopted the MSCI AC Asia ex Japan index as its benchmark, as no suitable regional smaller companies index was available at that time," the spokesperson said. 

"In October 1999 the directors agreed to the replacement of the MSCI with the SG Asian ex Japan Smaller Companies index, following its reconstitution to cover previously excluded countries. Unfortunately, this index ceased to be available from the end of 2002." 

"In 2003 the directors agreed to revert to the MSCI as the trust’s benchmark. This index, being dominated by larger companies, is far from ideal as a performance measurement tool. It has, however, the dual merit of being the most widely recognised regional index and of pre-dating the inception of the trust." 

On the trust’s monthly factsheet, it also uses the MSCI AC Asia ex Japan Small Cap index as a performance measure, but selects the larger cap index as its official performance-fee benchmark. When asked why First State does not use the smaller cap index, the spokesperson said: 

"This index is a relatively recent creation [compared to the trust] and isn’t as established as the main MSCI AC Asia ex Japan index." 

"The performance fee is based on three-year rolling periods which we believe in reality over the long-run will make little difference compared to a small cap index. Given that we start with a blank sheet of paper when we construct our portfolio, we feel any index will ultimately bear little resemblance to our portfolio."

As a result of the trust’s strong performance in the last three years – it is up 94.65 per cent compared with 26.82 per cent from its benchmark – the cost of owning the fund has increased significantly.

According to data from the AIC, Scottish Oriental Smaller Companies has seen its ongoing charges figure increase from 1.01 per cent to 2.28 per cent based on the last time the performance fee was charged. 


Performance of trust vs indices over 3-yrs

ALT_TAG

Source: FE Analytics

The MSCI AC Asia ex Japan Small Cap index has actually returned less than the larger cap index over this period, but has consistently outperformed in rising markets since its inception in 2007. In 2009 it was up 89.59 per cent, while the MSCI AC Asia ex Japan index was up just 53.2 per cent.

Simon Elliott, analyst at investment trust specialist Winterflood Securities, agrees that the large cap focused benchmark is by no means the best performance measure.

However, he says the fact Rippingall has to beat a benchmark-plus figure over a rolling three-year period makes the situation a lot fairer for investors. 

"The benchmark index is not the perfect reflection of the fund’s investment universe; however, an additional hurdle of 10 percentage points is a tough hurdle in normal market conditions and does mitigate the mismatch somewhat," Elliott commented. 

"The fee is quite involved and has a number of unusual features, which could be taken as being positive for shareholders." 

"Its fee is capped at 5 per cent of the trust’s gross assets or its market cap, depending on what is the lower figure." 

Elliott says the complexity of First State’s fee structure shows how important it is for investors to know exactly what they have bought in to, but he does not think this controversy should be enough to put people off the Scottish Oriental Smaller Companies trust. 

"As I’ve said, it’s far from ideal, but I’ve seen a lot worse," he continued. "The famous case was about 12 years ago when the Henderson [Global] Technology trust used the MSCI World index as its performance fee benchmark during the dotcom bubble."

"It massively outperformed and paid out £45m or so in the way of a performance fee."

The Scottish Oriental Smaller Companies IT is currently trading on a discount of 2.8 per cent.

Performance of trust vs sector and index over 10-yrs

Name  1-yr returns (%)  3-yr returns (%)    5-yr returns (%)    10-yr returns (%)   
Scottish Oriental Smaller Companies IT  21.88  94.65  129.91  617.21 
MSCI AC Asia ex Japan   5.35  26.82  8.22  249.81 
IT Asia Pacific ex Japan Equities   10  40.01  43.89  166.18 

Source: FE Analytics

According to FE data, the trust has significantly outperformed its sector and benchmark over the short-, medium- and long-term. The only Asia Pacific trust that has managed to beat Scottish Oriental over three, five and 10 years is Hugh Young’s Aberdeen Asian Smaller Companies IT.  

The Aberdeen trust has an ongoing charge of 1.5 per cent, but does not have a performance fee. It is currently on a premium of 4.8 per cent.   



 
Add your comment
Step 1: Tell us what you think...
 

Step 2: Prove you're not a robot...
You don't have to do this every time you submit a comment.

Login or register free and you won't see it again.
Enter the words above:
Step 3: Submit your comment...
Submit
 
Ark Welder Nov 01st, 2012 at 06:34 PM

Scottish Oriental's latest annual report has been released today. Due to the reduced outperformance compared to earlier years, the ongoing charges including performance fee has reduced to 1.96%.

The performance fee is based upon 3-year returns. As of today, Trustnet shows that the return to a shareholder over 3 years is 97.7% (NAV total return is 82.8%). The nearest OEIC has returned 73.4% and has a TER of 2.06% - and doesn't even have a performance fee.

The only fund to have returned more than SST over 3 years is Aberdeen Asian Smaller Companies IT with a shareprice total return of 165.9% and a NAV return of 114.7% (showing a narrowing of the discount).

So even with a performance fee, SST has trounced all of the competition except for one. It just hasn't trounced them by as much as before, resulting in the lower performance fee being due.

Reply
wwjd_andy Oct 31st, 2012 at 09:22 PM

They'll cap fees at 5%... well thank goodness for that ;-)

Reply
investar Oct 30th, 2012 at 05:55 PM

Henderson Far East Income is a far better trust. Their enlightened board don't burden shareholders with a so-called "performance fee" which actually reduces the performance of Scot Orient to shareholders by 2.28%. It looks like the performance fee is spiralling out of control. Normally a sign that the Board of Directors have lost the plot. Not for me. Ditch the "performance-reducing" fee and I might look again

Reply
Ark Welder Oct 31st, 2012 at 10:42 PM

After the deduction of all fees, including the performance fee, Scottish Oriental has increased its net assets on a total return basis by 23.4%, 82.8% and 107.8% over 1, 3 and 5 years.

The same net returns for the non-performance fee Henderson FE Income are 15.9%, 29.7% and 29.8%.

Reply
valiant Oct 30th, 2012 at 03:46 PM

Over time, the only people that get rich are the Fund Managers.

Reply
john Oct 30th, 2012 at 03:20 PM

Why all this criticism- they have done well- say so and stop bleating-the board one assumes will review the criteria and raise the level for the next period-they should also put in a downside which maybe there already. as a shareholder sit back and enjoy it or as suggested GET out---well done --good luck and keep going-

Reply
Bill Oct 30th, 2012 at 01:44 PM

My experience is that investment trusts are usually cheaper than the equivalent open ended fund, but you have to watch the performance fees ( if applicable) when comparing trusts. I started investing in investment trusts 7 to 8 months ago and am happy with the results

Reply
 

Next page»

Back to top of page

 

Follow FE Trustnet

Video Headlines

More Videos

Why you should ignore the "slowdown" in emerging markets

GMT 12:30 | 04-Jun-2013

Why income investors cannot afford to ignore emerging markets

GMT 17:00 | 01-Jun-2013

 
Poll

Would you invest in a fund managed by someone who is nearing retirement age?

Yes

No

Vote

 
 
  • Stay connected with FE trustnet
  • Authorised and Regulated by the
    Financial Conduct Authority
  • © Trustnet Limited 2013. All Rights Reserved.
  • Please read our Terms of Use / Disclaimer
    and Privacy and Cookie Policy.
  • Data supplied in conjunction with Thomson Financial Limited,
    London Stock Exchange Plc, StructuredRetailProducts.com
    and ManorPark.com