To continue using FE Trustnet please choose an edition:

This site uses cookies. Some of the cookies are essential for parts of the site to operate and have already been set. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but if you do, parts of the site may not work. To find out more about cookies on the website and how to delete cookies, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

I accept the FE Trustnet cookie policy

For more information Click here

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 

Wake up to potential of US funds, urges Schooling-Latter

Chelsea Financial's head of research says the shale gas story, housing market recovery and re-shoring of businesses from overseas mean the world’s largest economy could even outpace emerging markets this year.

By Joshua Ausden, News Editor, FE Trustnet Follow
Thursday March 07, 2013


US funds are under-represented in UK investors’ portfolios, according to Chelsea Financial Service’s Juliet Schooling-Latter, who believes they are set to miss out on one of the industry’s most compelling growth stories.

ALT_TAG Schooling-Latter (pictured) says she has recently upped her exposure to US funds in her own investment portfolio, but is seeing a lack of interest from private investors – in spite of the favourable outlook for the region.

"I don’t understand it, I really don’t," she said. "Chelsea investors have less than 3 per cent of their portfolios in US funds, even though it makes up a massive chunk of the global index."

"It’s such a vast economy, but for some reason it gets overlooked."

Schooling-Latter says now is a particularly interesting time to invest in the region.

"There’s an awful lot to be positive about," she continued. "First of all you’ve got the shale gas story, which not only gives US businesses a cost advantage, but also bodes well for infrastructure and job growth and therefore consumer spending."

"The housing market is beginning to take off again, banks are lending and you’ve also got the re-shoring of businesses from emerging markets, which is a really interesting story."

"During times of a weak dollar, emerging markets tend to outperform, and when the dollar is strong, the US tends to outperform. It looks like we’re entering a phase of a stronger dollar, so there’s an obvious appeal there."

The US equity market has been one of the leading lights in the recent equity rally, with the S&P 500 up 16.7 per cent so far this year.

Performance of index and sectors in 2013

ALT_TAG

Source: FE Analytics

IMA North America and IMA North American Smaller Companies are the second- and third-best performing sectors so far this year, behind only IMA Japanese Smaller Companies.

Schooling-Latter acknowledges that the issue of debt is still important and could act as a drag on any recovery, especially if the US plunges into another recession.

"If they muck about with policy, then obviously this would be a problem for markets," she said.

"However, I’d look at this as more of a buying opportunity than anything else. They seem to have got their act together overall."


Schooling-Latter’s views echo those of a number of fund managers.

FE Alpha Manager David Coombs said earlier this week that the US could be the next significant growth story for investors and could even outpace emerging markets.

"'Emerging America' could be the next big growth story for investors," said Coombs.

"There is growing evidence of something significant happening that could well challenge the West-to-East investment theme that has anchored consensus wisdom over the past 10 years."

"Recent US GDP revisions were a bit poor, but the 'rust tigers' – mid-western and north-eastern states, including Illinois, Ohio and Michigan – have certainly put in some impressive manufacturing gains."

"Politics also appear to be moderating. The fiscal cliff should no longer derail the recovery, although there will be some tightening of fiscal policy," he added.

Coombs believes the US equity market is "fair value", and has increased his exposure to growth-focused portfolios, including the Royce Smaller Companies fund.

Thames River’s Gary Potter is equally positive; he believes a US recovery will push the FTSE to an all-time high this year.

Schooling-Latter rejects the popular argument that investors are better off holding a US tracker rather than a US fund, and says she has recently added AXA Framlington American Growth to her ISA.

"It’s very Alpha-driven and has consistently outperformed – something that is supposedly impossible to do," she said.

"I’m thinking of adding some more US exposure as well."

FE Analytics data shows that on average, US funds have been less effective at adding value than their rivals in other emerging and developed markets.

In the IMA North American sector, the average fund has added 1.55 per cent of Alpha to its benchmark over a five-year period. By contrast, in the UK All Companies sector the figure is 2.56 per cent, and in the IMA Asia Pacific ex Japan sector the figure is 2.01 per cent.

Stephen Kelly’s AXA Framlington American Growth fund has been one of the better funds at adding value to its benchmark, with an Alpha of 2.63 per cent over five years.

This has translated into returns of 74.99 per cent over the period, compared with 56.44 per cent from the IMA North American sector average, which is also the fund’s benchmark.

Performance of fund vs sector over 5yrs

ALT_TAG

Source: FE Analytics

The fund has also outperformed over three and 10 years, with less volatility, but has fallen short over one.


Gordon Grender’s GAM North American Growth fund is consistently the best fund in terms of Alpha in the sector, with a score of 8.73 per cent over five years.

FE Alpha Manager Grender uses the S&P 500 as his benchmark.

The fund is also one of the best performers on a cumulative basis, boasting top quartile performance in its sector over one, three, five and 10 years.

Both GAM and AXA funds have a total expense ratio (TER) of 1.56 per cent, though the former has a steeper minimum investment, at £6,000.



 
Add your comment
Step 1: Tell us what you think...
 

Step 2: Prove you're not a robot...
You don't have to do this every time you submit a comment.

Login or register free and you won't see it again.
Enter the words above:
Step 3: Submit your comment...
Submit
 
David Mar 08th, 2013 at 03:48 PM

I'm not sure if I should believe this post. Is there any related article on this?

David
www.pharmacyschooling.com

Reply
jonuk76 Mar 07th, 2013 at 05:01 PM

I think it's worth a mention that a lot of global funds that aren't US specific can, and in most cases do, have significant percentages in the US. As a random example the popular Newton Global Higher Income fund is nearly 40% invested in North America.

Bizarrely, the crazy dudes at Manek Growth had nearly a quarter of their fund in US growth stocks at the end of last year, despite the fund being in the UK All Companies sector...

For US focussed funds, it's hard to look past the fact that it's very rare for them to outperform the index consistently. For that reason I'd go for something like Vanguard US Index.

Reply
TOFT Mar 07th, 2013 at 03:07 PM

Over te last year I've invested in Biotech Growth (BIOG) and had a return of 57% in 13 months. Black Rock North American Income and had a return of 11.09% in 4 months and Black Rock New Energy with a retun of 17.89%. I think there's sill value around particulrly in Private Equity Funds.

Reply
 

Back to top of page

 

Follow FE Trustnet

Video Headlines

More Videos

 
Poll

When investing in a UK Equity Income fund, do you buy income or accumulation shares?

Income shares

Accumulation shares

Vote