Connecting: 216.73.216.57
Forwarded: 216.73.216.57, 104.23.243.243:44677
Why RDR represents a buying opportunity for investment trusts | Trustnet Skip to the content

Why RDR represents a buying opportunity for investment trusts

30 March 2013

The new regulations have helped to drive discounts across the closed-ended universe to their lowest level in five years, and they could fall further still, writes Jemma Jackson of the AIC.

By Jemma Jackson

Association of Investment Companies

Changes are afoot for the investment company sector, not least because of the Retail Distribution Review.

ALT_TAG Investment companies have for too long been the Cinderellas of the collective investment world, certainly as far as financial advisers are concerned.

This is despite their tendency to produce superior long-term returns - albeit with the potential for a bumpier ride along the way.

With commission now a thing of the past and advisers required to at least consider investment companies if they are to remain independent, the sector should start to become more accessible to a wider audience.

While we are not expecting fireworks overnight, all the tentative signs are that this is happening.

In January, the AIC received the highest ever inflow of traffic to our website, and investment company discounts are at their lowest in five years.

Also encouragingly, the sector broke the £100bn barrier in terms of assets under management this year, and is starting to see a pick-up in launch activity, perhaps not surprisingly considering the strong performance so far this year of the stock market.

Share issuance, particularly in the income-orientated sectors, has also been strong and, given the sector’s strong dividend track record, it’s perhaps not surprising that more and more investors are turning to income-orientated investment companies in the current low interest rate environment.

Ironically, investment companies have long been the natural home for sophisticated, self-directed private investors.

While it would be wrong to suggest that it is just the absence of commission that has kept advisers away from the sector (some of the additional structural features such as gearing and pricing differences have clearly played a role), the history of demand for investment companies suggests that take up among advisers can only get better.

JP Morgan Asset Management, which is the market leader in investment companies in terms of assets under management, estimates that less than 1 per cent of its shareholder base comes from business through financial advisers, whereas a significant proportion is represented by direct private investors.

This is a miss-match which is hard to square considering the investment company sector’s clear popularity with private investors "in the know".

While we are not expecting the floodgates to open overnight, RDR probably still presents the single largest long-term opportunity for the investment company industry.

The AIC has trained 1,400 advisers over the last 18 months alone, and there is no sign of their appetite for training abating.

Recent research suggests that 74 per cent of advisers are planning on increasing their clients’ exposure to investment companies over the next six months to three years.

Liquidity concerns remain the biggest barrier to entry - 49 per cent of advisers consider this the greatest stumbling block.

This is followed by gearing, although conversely, gearing is also cited as the largest benefit of the investment company sector by 64 per cent of advisers.

Discount opportunities are cited as the second most important benefit of the sector by 60 per cent of advisers, followed by competitive costs. But the key motives for advisers to invest in the sector are low-cost active management, a proven performance record and choice.

Another perhaps likely consequence of RDR is the rise of the self-directed investor.

According to research this year by YouGov, the changes brought about by RDR mean that nearly one-fifth of respondents are now more likely to arrange their own financial affairs. This may well also prove to be good news for the investment company sector.

The sector’s fan base among sophisticated private investors suggests that the more private investors know about investment, the more they tend to like investment companies.

The AIC’s new website, www.theaic.co.uk, launched at the beginning of March, has been designed with retail investors and financial advisers in mind.

It aims to provide investors, as well as advisers, with all the information they need on investment companies in a clear and user-friendly way.

The site is supported by a new glossary, which explains key concepts using clear, jargon-free text, graphics and videos.

Each AIC member company has a redesigned profile page, presenting key information in a more accessible way.

The site continues to provide users with all the AIC’s statistical information, as well as topical news stories, videos and commentaries. Investors and advisers can also build their own bespoke "watchlist" to keep a closer eye on companies they are researching.

There is also a dedicated area of the site for financial advisers, which includes the AIC’s training programme, information on platforms that offer investment companies, and other material designed to help them build clients' portfolios that incorporate investment companies.

We’ve also been listening to adviser feedback and our greater clarity on gearing (borrowing) levels will be useful for both investors and advisers alike.

We are now publishing gearing in percentage terms, whereas previously we used a ratio.

Secondly, we will be publishing the three-year historic levels of gearing for member companies, allowing investors and advisers to gauge how actively gearing is used by the company.

The third change helps advisers understand what the future gearing level of an investment company will be, allowing them to better measure risk.

Whilst the investment company sector has long been known for housing a good deal of funds with low charges, particularly among the retail-orientated funds, it is clear that investment company boards are keeping a close eye on costs, and will be keen to remain competitive in a post-RDR world. A number of investment companies are not only changing their fee structures, but lowering them.

Most recently, a number of Baillie Gifford managed investment companies, Pacific Horizon, Edinburgh Worldwide, Baillie Gifford Japan and Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon announced charges would be coming down, as did Fidelity China Special Situations.

Since taking over the management of Henderson Asian Growth, now renamed Asian Total Return, Schroders has simplified fees for the trust and waived them until September. Standard Life UK Smaller Companies Trust scrapped its performance fee last year, and in 2010 a number of retail focussed investment companies abolished their performance fee arrangements, namely Schroder UK Growth, Foreign & Colonial, and British Assets Trust.

The year has got off to a good start for the investment company sector, and some of the positive changes we are starting to see may well have been informed by the Retail Distribution Review.

In a low interest rate environment, many investors are finding that they have few places to turn to other than the stock market if they are to achieve a decent yield.

The key, as always, is holding your nerve when markets get bumpier – and some old habits are harder to change than others. In the long-term, the investment company sector is well placed to benefit from some of the key changes that are happening post-RDR.

But in the short-term, the performance of the stock market is likely to be the dominant contributory factor.

Jemma Jackson is PR manager at the Association of Investment Companies. The views expressed here are her own.

Editor's Picks

Loading...

Data provided by FE fundinfo. Care has been taken to ensure that the information is correct, but FE fundinfo neither warrants, represents nor guarantees the contents of information, nor does it accept any responsibility for errors, inaccuracies, omissions or any inconsistencies herein. Past performance does not predict future performance, it should not be the main or sole reason for making an investment decision. The value of investments and any income from them can fall as well as rise.