Your Basket
Your Basket
There are no funds in your basket. To add funds to your basket use the Green Plus Icon wherever you see it next to a fund.
Fund name
Aberdeen American Growth  
Fidelity American  
Schroder UK Mid 250  
M&G Recovery  
Jupiter Merlin UK Growth  
Close Basket Open basket

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 

Gilts more volatile than corporate debt

Using rolling one-year measures, the UK Government bond sectors have been revealed as the riskiest in the fixed interest asset class.

By Mark Smith, Reporter, FE Trustnet Follow
Monday March 19, 2012


Investing in gilts is much riskier than investing in the debt of British companies, the latest research from FE Trustnet shows.

Using a rolling one-year measure, IMA UK Index Linked Gilts is historically the most volatile of fixed income sectors, followed by IMA UK Gilt.

The UK Index Linked Gilts sector has consistently been the most volatile bond sector over the last 10 years.

ALT_TAG


Source: FE Analytics


UK gilts are perceived to be the safest place to invest money because the probability of the Government going bust are remote compared with corporations or individuals.

However, the data reveals that the average fund in the Sterling Corporate Bond sector has never been more volatile than Government debt funds over the last decade.

The data dispels the assumption that UK debt is the best shelter in uncertain markets. Sterling Corporate Bond funds have not only been less volatile, they have also rewarded investors with better returns.

Over the last three years the average UK Gilt fund has returned 15.19 per cent with an annual volatility score of 6.71 per cent, while the average Corporate Bond fund has returned 38.11 per cent, with 4.77 per cent volatility.

Performance of sectors over 3-yrs


ALT_TAG

Source: FE Analytics

Rob Gleeson, head of research at FE, says that the fluctuating prices in the gilt market can make investments unpredictable and hard to manage.

"People often mistake volatility and risk," commented Gleeson. "The credit risk in UK Government bonds is very low, but the investment risk - the price variability measured by volatility - is quite high. This is because investors change their minds about gilts a lot. People flock to them when things look bad and abandon them at the first sign of recovery."

"It is the fluctuation in demand that causes the volatility. Whatever the merits of an asset class, its value is ultimately subject to the whims of the market and the government bond markets in particular are quite fickle."

Last year gilts were the most successful asset class. The average UK Index-Linked Gilts fund returned 21.25 per cent over the period. However, with losses of 4.74 per cent, the sector has been the worst performer so far in 2012.

In 2008, Iceland was brought to the brink of bankruptcy when its government ran into difficulties refinancing its debt liabilities. The crisis emphasised the risks associated with high levels of government debt and called into question the role of sovereigns as safe havens.

The ongoing sovereign debt crisis in Europe has continued to raise concerns about the risks associated with investing in government bonds, as debt-to-GDP ratios have risen ever higher in some of Europe’s peripheral economies. Investors and politicians have had to contend with the very real threat of a Greek default and that anxiety has weighed on global equity markets.

Throughout 2011 investors fled to perceived safe-havens such as the UK in a bid to protect their assets. The yield on 10-year gilts has fallen to as low as under 2 per cent.



 
Add your comment
Step 1: Tell us what you think...
 

Step 2: Prove you're not a robot...
You don't have to do this every time you submit a comment.

Login or register free and you won't see it again.
Enter the words above:
Step 3: Submit your comment...
Submit
 
Theo Mar 19th, 2012 at 04:39 PM

It is very funny, but while Rob Gleeson has explained very well the difference between volatility and risk, the writer starts his article by trumpeting most sensationally, that his volatility figures prove that quilts,government bonds with redemption dates and guaranteed by HM Treasury, are riskier than company bonds, some of which are called junk bonds and guaranteed by no one. Defaults in them are regular happenings.

Unfortunately, all TN writers make this mistake, confusing every one of us and lowering the standard of TN research. But I think the primary blame is on the shoulders of FE, which took the weekly volatility figures, put them on a percentage scale and called them Risk Scores. How they got it past Rob Gleeson I shall never know.

Reply
Ark Welder Mar 19th, 2012 at 04:30 PM

So we start off with:

"Gilts more volatile than corporate debt

Using rolling one-year measures, the UK Government bond sectors have been revealed as the riskiest in the fixed interest asset class."

To be followed later by the comment "'People often mistake volatility and risk,' commented Gleeson.".

Perhaps what the gilts market has over corporate debt is increased liquidity, and this allows an increased level of volatility. the further comment by Gleeson, "The credit risk in UK Government bonds is very low, but the investment risk - the price variability measured by volatility - is quite high." shows that it is insuficcient to describe the level of risk that an asset or asset class has, unless the type of risk is also given.

Reply
 

Back to top of page

 

Follow FE Trustnet

Video Headlines

More Videos

Gray: Market rally has made me more bearish than ever

GMT 15:30 | 30-Apr-2013

From the analyst's desk

GMT 10:00 | 29-Apr-2013

 
Poll

Do you think UK inflation will increase in the next 12 months?

Yes, it will increase significantly

Yes, it will increase slightly

It will stay at around the same level

No, I think inflation will fall

Vote

 
 
  • Stay connected with FE trustnet
  • Authorised and Regulated by the
    Financial Conduct Authority
  • © Trustnet Limited 2013. All Rights Reserved.
  • Please read our Terms of Use / Disclaimer
    and Privacy and Cookie Policy.
  • Data supplied in conjunction with Thomson Financial Limited,
    London Stock Exchange Plc, StructuredRetailProducts.com
    and ManorPark.com