Your Basket
Your Basket
There are no funds in your basket. To add funds to your basket use the Green Plus Icon wherever you see it next to a fund.
Fund name
Aberdeen American Growth  
Fidelity American  
Schroder UK Mid 250  
M&G Recovery  
Jupiter Merlin UK Growth  
Close Basket Open basket

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 

Warnings over panic-selling fall on deaf ears

More than one-quarter of investors are ignoring professional advice and allowing fear of short-term losses to cloud their judgment.

By Mark Smith, Reporter, FE Trustnet Follow
Monday April 16, 2012


A worrying number of investors continue to ditch funds at the slightest sign of trouble, according to FE Trustnet research.

ALT_TAGAccording to a recent poll of FE Trustnet users, more than a quarter of investors – 27 per cent – said that they would only tolerate underperformance in a fund for a maximum of six months before selling it. Of this group, a third said that they would ditch a fund after just three months if they saw it lagging the benchmark.

"Most people are too short-termist," said AWD Chase de Vere’s Patrick Connolly. "Even the very best quality funds with the very best fund managers will have periods where they underperform. Investors need to stick to their decisions and keep long-term goals in mind."

He added: "After two to three years of underperformance people should start reviewing the place of a fund in a portfolio but the most important thing is to understand why a fund is lagging. It might be that something has drastically changed about the approach but more likely is that the portfolio is better suited to a different market condition."

There have been a number of recent high-profile examples where popular funds have underperformed their peer group for long enough for investors to start getting anxious.

The most obvious example is Neil Woodford’s Invesco Perpetual Income and High Income portfolios. The manager underperformed the IMA UK Equity Income average significantly during the market rally of 2009 and 2010, for which he came under fire. He was forced to go on the record and justify his high exposure to defensive sectors such as pharmaceuticals and tobacco.

While many investors scaled back their exposure, or ditched the fund entirely, Woodford’s record since then has silenced the critics. FE data shows that in 2011 the manager’s High Income portfolio returned 8.99 per cent, more than any other UK equity-focused fund.

Year-on-year performance of fund since 2008

 
2011 reuturns (%)
2010 reuturns (%) 2009 reuturns (%)
2008 reuturns (%)
Invesco Perp High Income
8.99
10.94
9.81
-19.42
IMA UK Equity Income
-2.9
14.58
22.88
-28.54

Source: FE Analytics

Industry darling Anthony Bolton is another good example. During his tenure at the head of the Fidelity Special Situations portfolio the manager oversaw a number of multi-year periods in which the fund underperformed.

However, over the length of his career there is not a single fund manager in the UK that can boast a better record. Our data shows that £1,000 invested in the manager’s fund when it was launched in December 1979 would have been worth more than £144,000 when Bolton left it at the end of 2007.

Hargreaves Landown’s Rob Morgan says that investors need to recognise that active management is not designed for people with a short-term strategy.

"Investors unfairly expect managers to chop and change their approach to capture all the possible upsides but that isn’t how this industry works," he said. "The best managers never deviate from their approach no matter what is happening around them."

"Looking at six-month performance figures is dangerous because it’s not necessarily the right market conditions for a manager’s style to show its worth and these periods can run for a year or more. You need to hold a fund though several market cycles to get the maximum return. If you want to invest for the short-term then you should go for an ETF."

"People often see their funds do badly in the short-term because they buy off the back of good performance and that is often the very worst time to get into an investment," he continued. "Naturally private investors tend to look at the top of the league tables but this is when funds are most susceptible to short-term blips."

Morgan believes that there is little to be learned about an investment from performance tables alone and the experience and expertise of an IFA really proves its worth when it comes to selling a struggling fund.

"It’s really difficult to recognise when a fund is going sour," he said. "We meet with managers regularly and ask them questions to try and figure out if their view or approach has changed. If a manager is frequently changing direction this can be a good indicator that it is time to think about selling."



 
Add your comment
Step 1: Tell us what you think...
 

Step 2: Prove you're not a robot...
You don't have to do this every time you submit a comment.

Login or register free and you won't see it again.
Enter the words above:
Step 3: Submit your comment...
Submit
 
janet Moorby Apr 17th, 2012 at 11:30 PM

I don't think of it as panic more people in there fifties with money worries now,so forgoing pension investment payments.All you have to do is look at the FT 100 still not reached its peak of 99/2000

Reply
Theo Apr 16th, 2012 at 06:25 PM

Yes we have heard this advice 100 times over, but no one is telling us how long we should wait before taking action. And when a fund falls how do we know it will not stay down?

I understand that Manek outperformed every one of the thousands, laymen and professionals, who participated in a Sunday Times competition and won £'000s in prizes for two years running and look at what happened since then. Too many of the funds marked as outstanding by top IFAs prove to be duds.

It is easy to be wise after the event and select suitable examples for mentioning. The fact is that all the listed funds (except one)are managed by keen, dedicated professionals and who proves most successful depends overwhelmingly on chance.

Reply
Ark Welder Apr 16th, 2012 at 07:14 PM

Manek's outperformance in the Sunday Times competition was down to a flaw in the rules, which he exploited to the full. The deadline for portfolio changes was after the close of the markets at the end of the week: he waited until then, selected the best performing shares over the week and then submitted his entries online.

Reply
John Bowers Apr 16th, 2012 at 04:27 PM

Some funds, especially IT's are made for dipping in and out of. Take City natural resources for instance; a great record but highly volatile and it pays to trade during the ups and downs. I guess there are many similar TT's too.

Reply
 

Back to top of page

 

Follow FE Trustnet

Video Headlines

More Videos

Gleeson: The fund I’d back to hit a short-term target

GMT 07:00 | 15-May-2013

Gray: Market rally has made me more bearish than ever

GMT 15:30 | 30-Apr-2013

 
Poll

Do you think UK inflation will increase in the next 12 months?

Yes, it will increase significantly

Yes, it will increase slightly

It will stay at around the same level

No, I think inflation will fall

Vote

 
 
  • Stay connected with FE trustnet
  • Authorised and Regulated by the
    Financial Conduct Authority
  • © Trustnet Limited 2013. All Rights Reserved.
  • Please read our Terms of Use / Disclaimer
    and Privacy and Cookie Policy.
  • Data supplied in conjunction with Thomson Financial Limited,
    London Stock Exchange Plc, StructuredRetailProducts.com
    and ManorPark.com