Your Basket
Your Basket
There are no funds in your basket. To add funds to your basket use the Green Plus Icon wherever you see it next to a fund.
Fund name
Aberdeen American Growth  
Fidelity American  
Schroder UK Mid 250  
M&G Recovery  
Jupiter Merlin UK Growth  
Close Basket Open basket

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 

SIPPs: Managing your own money in middle-age

Low returns from fixed income products and the rising cost of living mean pensioners can no longer shield themselves from risk if they want to live out their retirement comfortably.

By Pascal Dowling, Group Editor, FE Trustnet Follow
Sunday May 06, 2012


Pressure on your pocket from all sides means the traditional shift towards lower-risk assets during middle-age makes less sense and effective asset allocation is even more crucial.

There was a time when most advisers would tell you middle-age was the period during which you should be shifting away from risk to protect the capital your pension had accrued as you approached retirement, which might not have been that far away if you’d played your cards right.

Now four years of low growth, negligible returns on cash savings, the soaring cost of living, stagnant property prices and entirely new costs, such as university tuition fees and unemployed children who cannot afford to leave home, mean investors can no longer afford to slacken the pace and protect their capital.

"Middle-age was a different thing 10 years ago," says Kerry Nelson, managing director at Nexus IFA. "People were aspiring to the idea of an early retirement – seriously expecting they could get out at 55 – and these days that’s really not feasible for the majority."

"That age-group is being hammered from all sides and the nature of the environment they’re in means they cannot afford to de-risk at this stage."

"If you move into bonds you’re pretty much looking at negative returns, the return on cash savings is negligible, you have to go up the risk ladder just to sustain your pot, never mind grow it."

This makes grim reading for off-the-peg pension investors, the majority of who will be in products that are doing exactly the opposite, throttling back their exposure to equities in the traditional manner.

For investors who have a self invested personal pension (SIPP) or are looking to transfer their personal pension into a SIPP they control themselves, now is the time to think carefully about asset allocation.

Rob Gleeson, head of research at FE, said: "It’s a tough call, there’s quite a balancing act here. You’ve got about 20 years of savings you don’t want to fritter away, but still have a 15- or 20-year time horizon and the ability to make a real difference to your retirement by taking on extra risk."

"This is basically the only time that attitude to risk really matters – at all other times it’s pretty much overshadowed by time horizon and other situational factors."

Low volatility, high performance funds in key sectors over 5-yrs

Sector
Fund
Performance (%)
Annualised volatility (%)
IMA Global Emerging Markets 
First State Global Emerging Markets Leaders
86.44
17.78
IMA Property
Threadneedle UK Property
-5.6
2.35
IMA UK All Companies
Liontrust Special Situations
57.04
16.16
IMA North America
AXA Framlington American Growth
48.26
16.95
IMA UK Sterling Corprorate Bond
M&G Strategic Corporate Bond
56.99
5.56

Source: FE Analytics

The majority of your exposure should remain in equities, according to Gleeson, with just over a third in fixed income, and a small exposure to property.
ALT_TAG
"A typical portfolio would be 30 per cent UK equities, 25 per cent international equities, 35 per cent fixed income, and 10 per cent property," Gleeson continued, "Although a more adventurous investor might want to have a little less UK exposure and a little more international equities."

International equities, Gleeson believes, should include emerging markets such as China and India, not just the big developed nations such as the US, Europe and Japan.

Many believe that China will drive stock market growth in the future, and it is tempting to pile into Chinese equities on that basis – but not everybody is convinced.

Societe Generale strategist Albert Edwards told Investment Week’s Nick Paler this week he thought Australia’s 20-year growth story was "a bubble built upon a commodity boom dependent for its sustenance on an even greater credit bubble in China".

Closer to home, RWC Enhanced Income fund managers Ian Lance and Nick Purves told FE Trustnet reporter Mark Smith that they think UK equities are overvalued.

"You often hear people say how one-year forward P/Es look cheap relative to their long-term average," said Lance. "What that tends to ignore is the fact that earnings are very elevated. Shiller P/E, a more stable measure of valuations, shows that the US and UK are trading above their long-term averages."

So if the Chinese miracle is more of a magic trick and the fragile recovery seen this year in UK equities isn’t to be trusted either, what choice does that leave investors who have money to put somewhere?

Nelson says a practical approach is necessary. "I wouldn’t pay off the mortgage right now. The potential growth in other areas is going to be greater than the interest you’re paying on a mortgage – and that’s not likely to go up dramatically any time soon."

"You don’t need to second-guess asset allocation, you want to diversify as much as possible to shelter yourself from the extreme volatility we’re seeing. You can access a broad range of superior funds in different asset classes, equities, bonds and alternatives – that’s the beauty of a SIPP."

This article is the second in our series on investing in SIPPs. To read the first article, written for investors who are looking at SIPPs for the first time, click here.



 
Add your comment
Step 1: Tell us what you think...
 

Step 2: Prove you're not a robot...
You don't have to do this every time you submit a comment.

Login or register free and you won't see it again.
Enter the words above:
Step 3: Submit your comment...
Submit
 
Rob Gleeson May 08th, 2012 at 01:09 PM

It' would be wrong to equate equity in your home to an investment in property, in the sense it's referred to in the article.

The property asset class consists of commercial property and derives most of its return from rental income, rather than capital growth.

The yields on commercial properties are quite detached from the fortunes of the housing market, which is what will generate returns for home owners.

Reply
John Clark May 07th, 2012 at 05:32 PM

I've seen many "model portfolios" described by different investment houses, pension providers and advisers, but they often vary quite a lot. There's no "correct" asset allocation - beyond the general advice to diversify and reduce the % of highest-risk funds as you near retirement (especially if seeking an annuity). In particular, fine-tuning a portfolio to within 1% of the total is pointless.

Reply
wwjd_andy May 06th, 2012 at 03:25 PM

Thanks for the advice on paying off the mortgage, but I don't think an investment of 10% in "property" is a sound strategy. Anyone who has a mortgage on a house will be gaining increasing exposure to the property market.

Reply
Theo May 06th, 2012 at 01:59 PM

What the IFAs here are saying, is that we should accept a higher risk for the possibility of higher reward. Nothing new in that, who proves to be correct in 20- 40 years is still a matter of chance and there will be 100 different IFA opinions until then.

What is certain and we better accept is that our economic model no longer works and we as a nation cannot carry on as we have been doing.

Reply
wyedean May 06th, 2012 at 01:47 PM

Yes invest in what you understand. Labels of the Funds do not always describe the contents - let alone guarantee them.
For funds the Question is cost when charges can eat up 10 to 25% of the return.
Why only one self select investment - if you have the time and inclination to follow it and can be a good learning curve and help you to understand and select the most appropriate funds.

Reply
John Castle May 06th, 2012 at 12:44 PM

I always worry about these pie charts which suggest asset allocations. I think better advice is to invest in sectors you understand. I have a SIPP for the last 17years which has done quite satisfactorarily without any fixed interest or property and even one self select investment in Rolls Royce.

Reply
James Gerrard May 06th, 2012 at 03:57 PM

My best decision was to invest in income growth Investment Trusts over the last 20 years. Comparatively low charges with steadily increasing income and no need to lose your savings.

Check out the performance of Murray International Trust and others.

Reply
 

Back to top of page

 

Follow FE Trustnet

Video Headlines

More Videos

Gleeson: The fund I’d back to hit a short-term target

GMT 07:00 | 15-May-2013

Gray: Market rally has made me more bearish than ever

GMT 15:30 | 30-Apr-2013

 
Poll

Do you think UK inflation will increase in the next 12 months?

Yes, it will increase significantly

Yes, it will increase slightly

It will stay at around the same level

No, I think inflation will fall

Vote

 
 
  • Stay connected with FE trustnet
  • Authorised and Regulated by the
    Financial Conduct Authority
  • © Trustnet Limited 2013. All Rights Reserved.
  • Please read our Terms of Use / Disclaimer
    and Privacy and Cookie Policy.
  • Data supplied in conjunction with Thomson Financial Limited,
    London Stock Exchange Plc, StructuredRetailProducts.com
    and ManorPark.com