Your Basket
Your Basket
There are no funds in your basket. To add funds to your basket use the Green Plus Icon wherever you see it next to a fund.
Fund name
Aberdeen American Growth  
Fidelity American  
Schroder UK Mid 250  
M&G Recovery  
Jupiter Merlin UK Growth  
Close Basket Open basket

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 

Equities hinder high-risk mixed asset funds

FE data shows that funds with a significant exposure to the global equity market have underperformed their low-risk peers over five years.

By Mark Smith, Reporter, FE Trustnet Follow
Friday May 25, 2012


Investors in the IMA’s mixed asset sectors have been punished for taking on extra risk over the last five years, according to the latest FE Trustnet research.

Data from FE Analytics shows that the Flexible Investment sector – in which managers are free to hold up to 100 per cent in equities – has returned less, at a higher level of risk, than any of the IMA’s four multi-asset sectors.

In a reversal of what investors might have expected, the Mixed Investment 0-35% Shares sector has been the best performer, with an average return of 9.74 per cent, ahead of Mixed Investment 20-60% Shares, which returned 6.34 per cent.

The higher risk Mixed Investment 40-85% Shares sector has returned 5.57 per cent over the last five years while the average Flexible Investment fund, with an annualised volatility score of 14.72 per cent, has returned just 3.21 per cent.

Moreover, low-risk funds with an emphasis on capital appreciation have been among the best performing in each of the four sectors over the period.

Within the Flexible Investment sector, the top-performing vehicle is the Trojan fund. Headed up by FE Alpha Manager Sebastian Lyon, the portfolio has returned 43.64 per cent over five years. It also tops the sector over one, three and 10 years. The fund had just 31 per cent of its assets invested in equities as of 30 April 2012.

FE Alpha Manager
Martin Gray’s CF Miton Special Situations and CF Miton Strategic Portfolios are two of the leading lights in the Mixed Investment 40-85% Shares sector.

Gray’s track record over the long-term speaks for itself; he has returned 97.95 per cent over the last 10 years – more than double that achieved by his peer group.

He is famed for being one of the best-performing managers during the 2008 financial crisis, returning 5.89 per cent during the calendar year.

Performance of manager vs peer group over 10-yrs

ALT_TAG

Source: FE Analytics

CF Ruffer Total Return is the standout performer in IMA Mixed Investment 20-60% Shares over five years. FE Alpha Managers David Ballance and Steve Russell have an outstanding record in both rising and falling markets and have consistently added more Alpha than any other manager in the sector.

At the other end of the risk spectrum, MFM CFS Balanced Opportunities has taken on an annualised volatility of 21.63 per cent over the last five years – the third highest across all four sectors – but has lost 33.15 per cent over the period, again more than any other mixed asset investment.

Over the last three years, while markets have generally risen, albeit with high levels of volatility, the more traditional risk/reward pattern emerges. Mixed asset funds with a higher proportion of their funds in equities have performed better.

The £36m Investec Managed Growth fund in the Flexible Investment sector is one of the top-performers over the last three years, with returns of 40.72 per cent. The fund had 94.9 per cent of its assets invested in equities as at 30 April 2012.

The leading low-risk funds have still managed to keep up with rising markets. The Trojan fund returned 44.88 per cent over three years, but has just 20 per cent invested in the equity market.



 
Add your comment
Step 1: Tell us what you think...
 

Step 2: Prove you're not a robot...
You don't have to do this every time you submit a comment.

Login or register free and you won't see it again.
Enter the words above:
Step 3: Submit your comment...
Submit
 
Theo May 25th, 2012 at 05:40 PM


The various managers you have highlighted for admiration, may well have genuine talent, or they could just have been lucky. The fact that they were successful proves nothing.

I a sector of (say)200 funds, purely by chance, 100 funds will perform above the average, 50 will come in the top quartile and 20 will appear brilliant (top 10%). The question is who among those brilliant or lucky 20, will exhibit the same qualities in the next 5 years? Andrew Bolton did it 4 times at least, but unfortunately, we only had one like him.

Reply
 

Back to top of page

 

Follow FE Trustnet

Video Headlines

More Videos

Why you should ignore the "slowdown" in emerging markets

GMT 12:30 | 04-Jun-2013

Why income investors cannot afford to ignore emerging markets

GMT 17:00 | 01-Jun-2013

 
Poll

Would you invest in a fund managed by someone who is nearing retirement age?

Yes

No

Vote

 
 
  • Stay connected with FE trustnet
  • Authorised and Regulated by the
    Financial Conduct Authority
  • © Trustnet Limited 2013. All Rights Reserved.
  • Please read our Terms of Use / Disclaimer
    and Privacy and Cookie Policy.
  • Data supplied in conjunction with Thomson Financial Limited,
    London Stock Exchange Plc, StructuredRetailProducts.com
    and ManorPark.com