Your Basket
Your Basket
There are no funds in your basket. To add funds to your basket use the Green Plus Icon wherever you see it next to a fund.
Fund name
Aberdeen American Growth  
Fidelity American  
Schroder UK Mid 250  
M&G Recovery  
Jupiter Merlin UK Growth  
Close Basket Open basket

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 

Spooner urges caution over “cheap” banking stocks

Some investors see opportunities in the beleaguered financial sector, but industry insiders say valuations are low for a reason.

By Thomas McMahon, Reporter, FE Trustnet Follow
Tuesday June 12, 2012


The expansion of retailers such as M&S and Tesco into retail banking has created more uncertainty for the UK financial sector, says Graham Spooner, investment adviser at The Share Centre. 

ALT_TAGWhile Spooner believes it is too early to predict the results of these ventures, he thinks they could become yet another pitfall awaiting investors who buy the likes of HSBC and Lloyds because they are "cheap". 

"We don’t see any reason to rush into banks so we prefer to watch from the sidelines," he said.

"It’s all well and good saying they are cheap, but there’s a good chance that in five years' time these new banks or other unexpected factors scupper their recovery." 

"Even the banks themselves are saying it will take four or five years to get over the problems in the markets. If they are saying that, we believe it, as they always want to focus on the positives," he added. 

Spooner’s comments contrast with those of Sanjeev Shah, manager of Fidelity Special Situations, who told FE Trustnet last week that he thinks both Lloyds and HSBC are substantially undervalued.

Shah currently has 7.5 per cent of his portfolio in HSBC and a further 5 per cent in Lloyds, his two biggest holdings. 

Data from FE Analytics shows HSBC’s share price decoupled from the FTSE in early 2010 and has lagged the index since then.

Performance of stock vs index over 5-yrs

ALT_TAG

Source: FE Analytics

Richard Hunter, head of UK equities at Hargreaves Lansdown, says HSBC is a better buy than Lloyds.

"In terms of HSBC we are talking global diversification, robust balance sheets, a bank that didn’t need to take handouts during the financial crisis, one with a stable income and a yield of 4.8 per cent," he commented. 

According to Hunter, anyone looking for a mid-term financials investment should consider HSBC.

He says the picture for the sector at the moment is quite grim and new entrants such as Metro Bank, which has announced plans to float in 2014, will suffer from the same risk-aversion that is haunting its competitors. 

"With regard to Metro Bank, the down-side of floating at this particular time is banks are going to be treated with a broad-brush approach, so they will all be marked down by investors together," he explained. 

Hunter suggests a date in 2014 may have been chosen to give Metro Bank wriggle room, as it is likely to be aware of the risk-on/risk-off short-termism of today’s markets. 

Spooner says that Standard Chartered is another relatively strong pick among UK financials.

"It is often overlooked because it is so Asia-focused but it is UK-listed," he claimed. 

Shah’s second-biggest holding Lloyds is less appealing to both Spooner and Hunter. 

The stock has lost 94 per cent since July 2007.

Performance of stock vs index over 5-yrs

ALT_TAG

Source: FE Analytics



 
Add your comment
Step 1: Tell us what you think...
 

Step 2: Prove you're not a robot...
You don't have to do this every time you submit a comment.

Login or register free and you won't see it again.
Enter the words above:
Step 3: Submit your comment...
Submit
 
Theo Jun 12th, 2012 at 04:37 PM

I think the green line in the lower chart should be labelled Lloyds and not HSBC.

I am surprised that there are still people who waste their time discussing banks seriously. I thought,like technology, they were words too dirty for polite society.

Surely any one can can see they have become super casinos where their managers wager their customers money on bets they do not understand, devised by Goldman Sachs and called derivatives. Their taxes are paid in tax havens, their winnings are paid in bonuses to the managers and their losses are covered by the tax payer. But they will never be changed because they are such fantastic gold mines for failed politicians. Who else would pay a man like Tony Blair £6 mln/yr?

Reply
 

Back to top of page

 

Follow FE Trustnet

Video Headlines

More Videos

Gleeson: The fund I’d back to hit a short-term target

GMT 07:00 | 15-May-2013

Gray: Market rally has made me more bearish than ever

GMT 15:30 | 30-Apr-2013

 
Poll

Do you own an Asia Pacific ex Japan fund that isn't run by Aberdeen or First State?

Yes

No

Vote

 
 
  • Stay connected with FE trustnet
  • Authorised and Regulated by the
    Financial Conduct Authority
  • © Trustnet Limited 2013. All Rights Reserved.
  • Please read our Terms of Use / Disclaimer
    and Privacy and Cookie Policy.
  • Data supplied in conjunction with Thomson Financial Limited,
    London Stock Exchange Plc, StructuredRetailProducts.com
    and ManorPark.com