Your Basket
Your Basket
There are no funds in your basket. To add funds to your basket use the Green Plus Icon wherever you see it next to a fund.
Fund name
Aberdeen American Growth  
Fidelity American  
Schroder UK Mid 250  
M&G Recovery  
Jupiter Merlin UK Growth  
Close Basket Open basket

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 

Five cheap funds in expensive sectors

FE Trustnet looks at funds that charge less for access to what are traditionally high-cost investment areas.

By Thomas McMahon, Reporter, FE Trustnet Follow
Monday June 18, 2012


Some sectors and themes are hard to invest in without incurring high charges. The cost of researching obscure areas in far-away lands can result in a total expense ratio (TER) of more than 2 per cent. 

While some of these areas have the potential to deliver significant returns, the corrosive effect of high charges over the long-term can put many investors off. 

Here are some funds that provide exposure to these areas at a below-average cost: 


Global Equity Income

Standard Life Global Equity Income has a total expense ratio (TER) of just 1.06 per cent, the lowest in IMA Global Equity Income.

The fund is a top-four performer in the sector over 10 years, with returns of 77.98 per cent compared with the average fund's 43.24 per cent.

Performance of fund vs sector over 10-yrs

ALT_TAG 

Source: FE Analytics

The fund's returns put it in the sector's top half in eight of the past 10 years, the only exceptions being 2008 and 2011 when it slipped to third- and fourth-quartile performance respectively. 

Kevin Troup took over as lead manager at the beginning of this year, following the departure of Jacqueline Kerr. The fund has a minimum investment of £500. 


Commodities

Five FE-crowned Oceanic Australia Natural Resources has a TER of just 1.4 per cent, which is well below average for a commodities portfolio.

The fund is certainly not for the faint-hearted and is susceptible to big losses during down periods; however, for investors positive about the outlook for natural resources, this fund is capable of providing significant returns over the long-term. 

With an annualised volatility of 39.46 per cent over five years, it has been one of the riskiest funds in the IMA unit trust and OEIC universe. In 2008 alone, it lost 63.2 per cent. However, in the following year it delivered in excess of 114 per cent to investors. 

Investment manager Peter Rue says the macro-economic environment is supportive of the fund’s current positioning.

He commented: "We believe that the markets may need assistance from the central banks around the world by injecting more liquidity into the system by way of quantitative easing." 

"This should support the commodities markets as money should flow to perceived ‘real assets’, and the commodity with most to gain in this situation should be gold, hence the fund is positioned overweight against the benchmark in precious metals." 

Managed by Myles Campion, the fund has a minimum investment of £5,000. The portfolio has returned 37.04 per cent since its launch in July 2005.

Another fund with high exposure to gold is Investec Enhanced Natural Resources, which has a TER of 1.68 per cent. 

It can take both long and short positions, with gold its second-largest long exposure, behind diversified energy. 

Since its launch in May 2008, the £275m fund has returned 11.74 per cent.

FE Alpha Manager Bradley George runs the portfolio with George Cheveley. The fund has a minimum investment of £1,000. 


Asia Pacific

CF Ruffer Pacific charges investors a TER of 1.59 per cent to provide exposure to Asia Pacific equities.

It has holdings across the region, with 10 per cent in Sri Lanka, nine per cent in Thailand and just seven per cent in China. 

It has returned 38.66 per cent since being taken over by FE Alpha Manager Mary McBain back in October 2006, compared with 20.83 per cent from its MSCI Asia Pacific benchmark, with less volatility. 

Performance of fund vs benchmark since October 2006

ALT_TAG

Source: FE Analytics

The fund, which sits in the IMA Specialist sector, has a minimum investment of £1,000. It currently has a 13 per cent weighting to Japan.
 

Multi-manager funds

Sitting in the IMA Global sector, the M&G Fund of Investment Trust has a TER of just 1.19 per cent, which is well below average for a multi-manager portfolio. 

It invests in shares of investment trust companies, with holdings spread through UK- and globally-focused funds. 

Aberdeen Asian Income, Henderson Asian Growth Trust and Edinburgh Dragon Trust are among its top-10 holdings, giving it a large exposure to Asia. 

The fund is managed by Richard O’Connor and has a minimum investment of just £500 and a minimum top-up of £10.

According to FE data, it has returned more than its Global sector average over three and 10 years, but has lost more over five. 



 
Add your comment
Step 1: Tell us what you think...
 

Step 2: Prove you're not a robot...
You don't have to do this every time you submit a comment.

Login or register free and you won't see it again.
Enter the words above:
Step 3: Submit your comment...
Submit
 
cordwainer Jun 19th, 2012 at 02:33 PM

Very misleading article since performance-related fees are being ignored. I know from the top of my head that the Investec Enhanced Natural Resources fund has performance fees, don't know about the others without looking up.

Reply
Theo Jun 18th, 2012 at 02:51 PM

Does it really cost that much more to research companies in oversees countries? These days fund managers subscribe to financial news agencies and get all the information they want for any country, more or less at the same price. And they have programs for filtering the companies according to any criteria the want.

A fund with assets of,say, £400 mln charging 0.25% more, takes in an extra £1 mln per year. Does it cost that much more? And how do similar funds manage on much lower charges? A few days ago we had here an article from a fund house domiciled in Ireland and registered in the Cayman Islands, with TER 2.25%.

I know fund houses offer the high cost excuse to naive investors, and IFAs of necessity keep repeating it for mass consumption, but one expects TN reporters to be less gullible than that.

Reply
R Lovegove Jun 18th, 2012 at 01:56 PM

It may be cheap but itspeforamnce is not that good and the yeild is also not good.

This sort of headline makes me thing i will not read the information form FE in future

Reply
 

Back to top of page

 

Follow FE Trustnet

Video Headlines

More Videos

Why you should ignore the "slowdown" in emerging markets

GMT 12:30 | 04-Jun-2013

Why income investors cannot afford to ignore emerging markets

GMT 17:00 | 01-Jun-2013

 
Poll

Would you invest in a fund managed by someone who is nearing retirement age?

Yes

No

Vote

 
 
  • Stay connected with FE trustnet
  • Authorised and Regulated by the
    Financial Conduct Authority
  • © Trustnet Limited 2013. All Rights Reserved.
  • Please read our Terms of Use / Disclaimer
    and Privacy and Cookie Policy.
  • Data supplied in conjunction with Thomson Financial Limited,
    London Stock Exchange Plc, StructuredRetailProducts.com
    and ManorPark.com