Your Basket
Your Basket
There are no funds in your basket. To add funds to your basket use the Green Plus Icon wherever you see it next to a fund.
Fund name
Aberdeen American Growth  
Fidelity American  
Schroder UK Mid 250  
M&G Recovery  
Jupiter Merlin UK Growth  
Close Basket Open basket

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 

Dennehy ‘names and shames’ bank-heavy bond funds

While corporate bond funds are usually viewed as low-risk investments, some with a high exposure to financials are vulnerable if the latest banking scandal gets any worse.

By Joshua Ausden, New Editor Follow
Tuesday July 03, 2012


Investors attempting to reduce risk on the back of recent equity market uncertainty could be jumping out of the frying pan and into the fire with so called ‘safe’ corporate bond funds, according to Fundexpert.co.uk’s Brian Dennehy (pictured).

ALT_TAG The IFA points to the significant number of portfolios that have in excess of 15 per cent exposure in banks, which he believes remain susceptible to another all-out crisis in the medium term.

“The banking system is under increasing strain across Europe with the S&P recently reminding us that those operating in the UK are certainly not immune,” he explained.

“The fact remains that market and regulatory pressure combined with the general fragility of the eurozone means a banking crisis is never far away. Investors seeking refuge in corporate bonds should look very carefully under the bonnet of the funds.”

“In particular, they should avoid funds with large exposures to bank bonds and instead invest in investment grade bond funds.”

UK retail banks have once again been in the news headlines for the wrong reasons in recent weeks. Bob Diamond announced his resignation as chief executive of Barclays earlier today in the aftermath of the Libor-fixing scandal, which some fear will spread to other institutions in the coming weeks.

The likes of Invesco Perpetual Corporate Bond, which has in excess of 38 per cent in banks, have rallied strongly over six months, but Dennehy says these now look exposed.

“Over the last six months the average corporate bond fund was up 5.02 per cent, and in a number of months has been the best-selling IMA sector,” continued Dennehy. “However, funds with high bank bond exposure underperformed in May. This should be an early warning to investors.”

Bond funds with high bank exposure

 Name  Bank exposure (%)
 Invesco Perpetual Tactical Bond

 48.75

 Invesco Perpetual Corporate Bond

 38.57

 Rathbone Ethical Bond

 38.1

 Threadneedle UK Corporate Bond

 28.31

 Cazenove Strategic Bond

 20.29


Source: FE Analytics

According to FE data, there are 16 funds across the IMA Sterling Corporate Bond and Sterling Strategic Bond sectors with more than 15 per cent in banks. The fund with the highest exposure – Paul Read and Paul Causer’s Invesco Perpetual Tactical Bond portfolio – has almost half of its assets invested in the sector.

Other notable funds in the group include the £2.5bn Halifax Corporate Bond fund, as well as David Oliphant’s Threadneedle UK Corporate Bond portfolio.

Dennehy says investors looking for safety in fixed interest funds should instead look to the likes of M&G Corporate Bond and Fidelity Moneybuilder Income, which are underweight banks and have a bias on solid, stable investment grade corporates.

Performance of funds versus sector over 10yrs

ALT_TAG
Source: FE Analytics

The two funds have underperformed their Sterling Corporate Bond sector average over six months, but were marginally up in May. Both are top quartile performers over a three, five and ten year period, with less volatility than their sector average.



 
Add your comment
Step 1: Tell us what you think...
 

Step 2: Prove you're not a robot...
You don't have to do this every time you submit a comment.

Login or register free and you won't see it again.
Enter the words above:
Step 3: Submit your comment...
Submit
 
Theo Jul 03rd, 2012 at 02:31 PM

It seems to me that bond funds are just as risky as equities and their reputation of being low risk is not deserved. In addition to the risks mentioned here, they are exposed to the risk of a rise in interest rates which will surely decimate them.

Reply
Ark Welder Jul 03rd, 2012 at 02:46 PM

Depends on the types of bonds that a fund holds, and the speed at which interest rates rise.

Reply
 

Back to top of page

 

Follow FE Trustnet

Video Headlines

More Videos

Gray: Market rally has made me more bearish than ever

GMT 15:30 | 30-Apr-2013

From the analyst's desk

GMT 10:00 | 29-Apr-2013

 
Poll

Would you be concerned if a manager of a fund you owned took charge of another portfolio as well?

Yes

No

Vote

 
 
  • Stay connected with FE trustnet
  • Authorised and Regulated by the
    Financial Services Authority
  • © Trustnet Limited 2013. All Rights Reserved.
  • Please read our Terms of Use / Disclaimer
    and Privacy and Cookie Policy.
  • Data supplied in conjunction with Thomson Financial Limited,
    London Stock Exchange Plc, StructuredRetailProducts.com
    and ManorPark.com