Your Basket
Your Basket
There are no funds in your basket. To add funds to your basket use the Green Plus Icon wherever you see it next to a fund.
Fund name
Aberdeen American Growth  
Fidelity American  
Schroder UK Mid 250  
M&G Recovery  
Jupiter Merlin UK Growth  
Close Basket Open basket

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 

Your favourite multi-asset funds examined

FE Trustnet takes a closer look at three of the most popular funds on our site that reside in the IMA’s Mixed Investment sectors.

By Mark Smith, Reporter, FE Trustnet Follow
Thursday July 12, 2012


Brian Dennehy, managing director of FundExpert, recently slammed multi-asset funds as a solution for “lazy” advisers. However, they still remain among the most popular products on FE Trustnet and provide a one-fund solution to many investors’ diversification needs. 


Investec Cautious Managed

With top-quartile performance over three, five and 10 years, the £2.1bn Investec Cautious Managed portfolio is one of the most consistent funds in the Mixed Investment 20-60% Shares sector. 

While the likes of CF Ruffer Total Return, Jupiter Merlin Income and Threadneedle Navigator Balanced Managed have a better track record over the last decade, it is the contrarian style of industry stalwart Alastair Mundy, who heads up the fund, that has seen it gain a host of admirers. 

Contrarian investing works on the principle of buying unloved assets and selling them again once they are back in demand, an area in which FE Alpha Manager Mundy excels. 

In the last 12 months, Investec Cautious Managed has lost marginally more than its sector average. Part of this underperformance can be attributed to the manager’s negative view on pharmaceuticals, which, as a defensive favourite, have rallied strongly amid the stock market chaos.

However, Mundy told FE Trustnet in May that investors were overlooking significant structural weaknesses in the sector and that he anticipates a decline. 

The fund has a minimum investment of £1,000 and a total expense ratio (TER) of 1.61 per cent.


Newton Balanced

The Mixed Investment 40-85% Shares sector poses a problem for retail investors because the three most impressive funds – McInroy & Wood Balanced, Newton Global Balanced and McInroy & Wood Income – are aimed at institutional investors and therefore have a minimum initial investment of at least £10,000. 

According to FE Trustnet data, the £2.7bn Newton Balanced fund is the second most-viewed factsheet in the sector behind Jupiter Merlin Balanced. 

The fund offers retail investors exposure to FE Alpha Manager Iain Stewart, who also runs the top-performing Newton Global Balanced and Real Return portfolios. 

Returns of 21.74 per cent and 102.97 per cent over five and 10 years respectively put the fund comfortably in the top-quartile in its sector. It has also been the fourth-least volatile fund over the last decade. 

Newton Balanced has suffered a difficult period recently, returning just 28.26 per cent over the last three years compared with 33.27 per cent from the average Mixed Investment 40-85% Shares fund. 

Stewart has a higher weighting to equities than his peer group across all three of his portfolios, a factor that has contributed to recent underperformance. 

However, the manager insists that, with much of this exposure in defensive sectors such as healthcare and telecoms, coupled with a 4 per cent gold hedge, there is more than enough protection on the downside. 

The fund has a minimum investment of £1,000 and a TER of 1.61 per cent.


Artemis Strategic Assets

This £864m fund is being closely watched by investors because it marks the comeback of highly regarded manager William Littlewood

Littlewood is invested in a basket of assets – not just UK equities, but also currencies, commodities, gilts and derivatives. 

The fund has recently achieved its three-year track record and it is fair to say that many would find its 30.95 per cent return, versus 54 per cent from its FTSE All Share benchmark, a little disappointing. 

Performance of fund vs index over 3-yrs

ALT_TAG 

Source: FE Analytics


"The fund has sacrificed returns in favour of reducing volatility but it is still closely correlated to the FTSE’s rise and fall and investors should probably ask themselves if they’d be better off in a pure equity fund," said Tim Cockerill, head of collectives research at Rowan Dartington. 

"It’s had a lot of inflows but this is probably down to the reputation of the manager. If it had a lesser-known manager at its head then I’d wager that it wouldn’t be the size it is.” 

The fund aims to beat both cash and the market over rolling three-year periods. It has a minimum investment of £1,000, and a TER of 1.59 per cent.



 
Add your comment
Step 1: Tell us what you think...
 

Step 2: Prove you're not a robot...
You don't have to do this every time you submit a comment.

Login or register free and you won't see it again.
Enter the words above:
Step 3: Submit your comment...
Submit
 
dlp6666 Jul 13th, 2012 at 04:15 PM

I'm VERY disappointed with the much-hyped [by HL] Artemis Strategic Assets and have started shifting some money out. Surely this experienced manager has now had enough time to adapt his surely highly flexible mandate to substantially improve rolling 3-year returns ...

Reply
David Jul 13th, 2012 at 02:13 PM

Theo, if they ate multi asset the manager should be able to move around enough to cope with interest rate rises and replace the exposure to Lind dated government bonds with very short duration, index linkers and high yield bonds, which are all more resilient to interest rates increasing, multi assett and risk rated funds are a good core holding in any portfolio!

Reply
Theo Jul 12th, 2012 at 10:24 PM

These equity and bond blended funds are plodding along steadily now with reasonable gains, low volatility and nothing to worry their risk averse, well heeled, owners in the shires. But when interest rates are relaxed, their prices will crush and their owners will be screaming like scalded cats.

Reply
Colin McKellar Jul 12th, 2012 at 06:35 PM

I conside William Littlewood's assessment that government bonds are grossly over-valued to be accurate. The problem is his timing. I recall the late Tony Dye of Phillips & Drew who was 100% correct in stating that equities were grossly over-valued but whose timing was several years out.

Reply
 

Back to top of page

 

Follow FE Trustnet

Video Headlines

More Videos

Gray: Market rally has made me more bearish than ever

GMT 15:30 | 30-Apr-2013

From the analyst's desk

GMT 10:00 | 29-Apr-2013

 
Poll

Would you be concerned if a manager of a fund you owned took charge of another portfolio as well?

Yes

No

Vote

 
 
  • Stay connected with FE trustnet
  • Authorised and Regulated by the
    Financial Services Authority
  • © Trustnet Limited 2013. All Rights Reserved.
  • Please read our Terms of Use / Disclaimer
    and Privacy and Cookie Policy.
  • Data supplied in conjunction with Thomson Financial Limited,
    London Stock Exchange Plc, StructuredRetailProducts.com
    and ManorPark.com