Your Basket
Your Basket
There are no funds in your basket. To add funds to your basket use the Green Plus Icon wherever you see it next to a fund.
Fund name
Aberdeen American Growth  
Fidelity American  
Schroder UK Mid 250  
M&G Recovery  
Jupiter Merlin UK Growth  
Close Basket Open basket

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 

The five myths of VCTs

Tim Levett, chairman of NVM Private Equity, dispels some of the misconceptions that surround venture capital trusts.

By Tim Levett, NVM Private Equity
Saturday July 14, 2012


When you learn that the three-year average annual dividend yield for the top-10 VCTs is 8.6 per cent – remember, that’s tax-free – you start to wonder: why aren’t these funds more popular? 

ALT_TAG What is even more puzzling is that VCTs tend to trade at a discount of 10 to 15 per cent to the net asset value (NAV) of their investments, so investors purchasing existing shares are buying the businesses in which they invest below their actual value. 

At a time when income from investments is scarce – enough to keep non-productive holdings such as gold and cash so popular – why aren’t VCTs in more portfolios, earning their investors a healthy income stream? I think it’s time to address some myths. 


Myth 1: “VCTs invest in risky businesses”

It’s true that some VCTs do seek out risky opportunities. But VCTs come in different flavours. A specialist VCT investing in early-stage biotech or renewables is a very different creature to a generalist one backing management buy-outs of established businesses.

Investors need to make sure they’re buying shares in the right kind, then.

"New investors seeking explicit exposure to riskier sectors know what they’re doing," said Rupert Dearden of Singer Capital Markets. 

"You have to do your research. But there are plenty of generalist VCTs with a strong track record that are clearly not seeking out high-risk investments – they back cash-generative businesses with growth prospects." 

This is important: many VCT managers understood immediately that the tax break on dividends was a huge advantage, so they sought out companies capable of generating income to boost those dividends – and structured their own investment deals with loan notes as well as pure equity.

That means they have predictable income streams, from interest to fund dividends. 


Myth 2: “It’s hard to buy VCT shares” 

Most investors will be able to buy shares in VCTs via their bank’s dealing service or their broker. It’s crucial to do your own research – and there are many sources of information.

Many buyers look for opportunities to snap up the VCTs they like the look of when they have a higher discount to NAV. 

The secondary market for many VCTs is certainly illiquid compared with that of some other assets. That said, they are not all created equal. In some of the larger, more established VCTs – ones with predictable income streams – there is more trading activity. 

With only a couple of market-makers, the spreads can be quite wide.

"So if you’re buying, it’s worth putting a limit order at a set discount to NAV you’re willing to pay," said Dearden. 

"That way, when the market makers have sellers at that level, you can buy the shares at a price you’re happy with." 


Myth 3: “There’s no easy exit from VCT shares” 

It is relatively simple to sell. Approach your broker or bank and get the market makers to find a price.

Distressed selling is obviously not ideal – in an illiquid market, being able to hold on for buyers at the right price is the best way of securing a decent exit. And with wide spreads, sellers are likely to have to take a discount into account.

But if you time it right, can be patient and put the right limit on the price, exiting a VCT holding is quite straightforward. 


Myth 4: “My stockbroker says the vehicle is too high-risk” 

Because VCTs generally invest in smaller businesses, they are higher risk than, say, a billion-pound investment fund or even shares in a household name. So brokers are right to identify them – alongside equities, of course – as higher risk.

But it is also true that brokers perceive them to be risky thanks to the liquidity of the market. That means there is a lack of research about them generally and a lack of awareness about individual VCTs.

They don’t have a database on Bloomberg showing where the best NAV discounts are, or how dividend yield has evolved over time. 

"It’s a bit of a chicken-and-egg situation," Dearden continued.

"Because the market for quoted VCTs is relatively small, there is less research produced on the sector and it is perceived as higher risk."

"That limits the number of brokers which are confident in recommending buying VCT shares. In turn, that constrains liquidity."  

There are many sources of research, not least the VCTs’ own annual reports – which will list the portfolio of investments, the management and the strategy for the fund.

The Association of Investment Companies (AIC) also has data on dividend track record and NAV – so investors can pick exactly the right blend.


Myth 5: “There’s no transparency in VCTs or the market” 

VCT manager websites contain details of the portfolio of investments, investment team, share price, dividends paid, as well as reports and accounts.

They usually also have a copy of the latest prospectus – so investors can see the aims and intentions of the fund.

Then there are investor websites that review and rank the performance of VCTs – such as FE Trustnet.

The AIC website also provides a range of performance data within its statistics section, as well as the latest accounts and often a factsheet for each fund.

VCT share prices are on the London Stock Exchange (LSE) website, along with regulatory announcements – and the FE Investegate site hosts many years' worth of regulatory news, which is useful for a more detailed analysis of a fund.
 
Tim Levett is chairman of NVM Private Equity. The views expressed here are his own.



 
Add your comment
Step 1: Tell us what you think...
 

Step 2: Prove you're not a robot...
You don't have to do this every time you submit a comment.

Login or register free and you won't see it again.
Enter the words above:
Step 3: Submit your comment...
Submit
 
workchamp Jul 16th, 2012 at 04:14 PM

ive owned a fair few vct's . they dont make money. a 30% tax rebate over 6 years is 5 % a year . but you lose commission , NAV discount and a TER of 3 to 4 % means you will have lost most of the rebate by the time you cash in. the 'divi' is paid out of capital . Bestinvest run full assessment. http://www.bestinvest.co.uk/investment-research/vct/vct-nav-and-discount.aspx .
remeber they all launched at £1 - you can see they lose by the current nav. to cap it all the worst losers get hidden; for example Levetts own Northern AIM VCT was rolled into Northern 3 VCT hiding the horrific losses

Reply
John Douglass Jul 15th, 2012 at 06:41 PM

In my experience the significant risk often overlooked with VCTs is that of share dilution which seems to be par for the course as one failing VCT over time is merged with another more recently launched fund. The merger is often sold to the shareholders under the guise of economies of scale but seems to be the fund manager's way of sweeping the evidence of poorly performing funds under the carpet. This has happened to me on more than one occasion and is the reason why I would not invest further in this sector.
Having said that NVM is one of my holdings which has held its value and performed well since launch over ten years ago and has proved by far the best of a not very good bunch.

Reply
Ark Welder Jul 15th, 2012 at 02:50 PM

Perhaps the tax relief given on new subscriptions is the cause of some of the liquidity problems. It provides more incentive for investors to buy a new issue than make a purchase in the secondary markets.

Reply
jd Jul 15th, 2012 at 01:57 PM

1. These vehicles were created to fleece investors with their high charges.
2. At some point they will create several other funds all investing in virtually, if not the same companies as the predecessors. However, they wont lower the fees, even if there are economies of scale.
3. In addition to point 2 they will try to raise further funds annually. C share issues anyone?
4. You may be able to sell the shares but only at a wide discount, thus wiping out virtually all of your tax benefits in one fell swoop.
5. If you have actually invested in one of these in the last 5 years or so and it has made you money, you are lucky. 90% of funds lose the investor money.

Reply
Max Beran Jul 15th, 2012 at 01:32 PM

Income tends to come in fits and starts so, like the lottery, only works as an income generator if you have lots (which I haven't).

Reply
Theo Jul 14th, 2012 at 03:03 PM

Following Levett's interesting article here, I looked up the VCT league table and the fact sheets of some trusts.

Unfortunately, there were no data for the sector average to enable me to asses its risk/reward status and very many trusts showed no div, yield at all. Only about 25 trusts out of 137 made any gain at 10yrs and only about 35 at 5 years. Too many did not subscribe to TN and information on them was therefor very sketchy.

I hope TN will write an article on some of the best funds there. For the present the sector is too opaque and risky for me.

Reply
 

Back to top of page

 

Follow FE Trustnet

Video Headlines

More Videos

Gray: Market rally has made me more bearish than ever

GMT 15:30 | 30-Apr-2013

From the analyst's desk

GMT 10:00 | 29-Apr-2013

 
Poll

Would you be concerned if a manager of a fund you owned took charge of another portfolio as well?

Yes

No

Vote

 
 
  • Stay connected with FE trustnet
  • Authorised and Regulated by the
    Financial Services Authority
  • © Trustnet Limited 2013. All Rights Reserved.
  • Please read our Terms of Use / Disclaimer
    and Privacy and Cookie Policy.
  • Data supplied in conjunction with Thomson Financial Limited,
    London Stock Exchange Plc, StructuredRetailProducts.com
    and ManorPark.com