Your Basket
Your Basket
There are no funds in your basket. To add funds to your basket use the Green Plus Icon wherever you see it next to a fund.
Fund name
Aberdeen American Growth  
Fidelity American  
Schroder UK Mid 250  
M&G Recovery  
Jupiter Merlin UK Growth  
Close Basket Open basket

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 

Cheapest tracker funds for your portfolio

Cost has become more of an issue in an era when growth has stagnated and charges have had a greater impact on total returns.

By Joshua Ausden, News Editor, FE Trustnet Follow
Wednesday July 18, 2012


It is a common misconception that all tracker funds are cheap. There are a number of passive products with a total expense ratio (TER) well in excess of 1 per cent, and some – including the £1bn Halifax UK FTSE 100 Index Tracking portfolio – charge more than 1.5 per cent. 

ALT_TAGConsidering the FE five crown-rated Trojan Income fund has a total expense ratio of just 1.06 per cent, the so-called advantages of a cheap tracker fund over an active rival are called into question. 

However, there are some options that have a TER of less than 0.5 per cent and closely emulate the performance of their index. Here is a selection: 


HSBC FTSE 250 Index – 0.27% TER

HSBC’s trackers are the cheapest on the retail market, with TERs of 0.27 per cent. While Vanguard’s funds are cheaper still, the minimum investment of £100,000 puts them out of reach of the average investor if they want to invest direct. This figure does come down significantly if one invests through a platform, however.

The HSBC FTSE 250 Index fund is particularly interesting given its performance relative to actively managed mid cap portfolios. 

Funds with this focus typically find it difficult to add value, which is why a tracker may be viewed as a more attractive option. 

According to FE data, the HSBC FTSE 250 Index portfolio has returned 54.07 per cent over a three-year period, compared with 57.77 per cent from the FTSE 250 index itself.

Over five years, the difference between the index and tracker is around the same margin. 

Performance of fund vs tracker and index

Name  1-yr returns (%) 3-yr returns (%) 5-yr returns (%) 10-yr returns (%)
FTSE 250 Index  -3.32  57.77  8.02  200.53 
HSBC FTSE 250 Index  -4.01  54.07  4.39  170.97 
Schroder - UK Mid 250  -5  39.47  -14.65  157.11 

Source: FE Analytics

In the last decade, the tracker has returned 171 per cent. While this is close to 30 per cent less than the index, only two out of the six actively managed UK mid cap funds with a long enough track record – Franklin UK Mid Cap and Old Mutual UK Select Mid Cap – have managed to beat the FTSE 250.

The tracker has beaten Andy Brough’s £1.1bn Schroder UK Mid 250 fund – by far the largest and highest profile in the sector – with ease over one-, three-, five- and 10-year periods. 

HSBC FTSE 250 Index is the only passive fund in the IMA unit trust and OEIC universe that gives investors access to the FTSE 250. 


F&C FTSE All Share Tracker – 0.43% TER

Of all the FTSE All Share Tracker funds with a TER of below 0.5 per cent, the F&C FTSE All Share Tracker fund has matched the index the most consistently over the last decade. 

According to FE data, it has returned 98.22 per cent over 10 years – just 5.04 per cent less than the FTSE All Share itself. The average UK All Companies and UK Equity Income funds have returned less than both over the period. 

Performance of fund vs sectors and index

ALT_TAG

Source: FE Analytics

Over five years, the F&C FTSE All Share Tracker has returned 0.68 per cent compared with the index’s 1.91 per cent, while over three years manager Terry Wood has delivered 41.91 per cent compared with 44.32 per cent from the index.


Santander Stockmarket 100 Tracker Growth – 0.35% TER

The £72.9m Santander Stockmarket 100 Tracker Growth fund is second only to HSBC FTSE 100 Index in the cost stakes; however, it has matched the index far more consistently and has a lower annualised tracking error over three, five and 10 years.

According to FE data, Santander Stockmarket 100 Tracker Growth has fallen short of the FTSE 100 by just 0.22 per cent over one year, 1.74 per cent over three years, 0.24 per cent over five years and 3.3 per cent over 10.

It has a tracking error of less than 3.65 per cent over all four time periods.

Performance of fund vs index

Name  1-yr returns (%)    3-yr returns (%)    5-yr returns (%)    10-yr returns (%)   
FTSE 100  0.07  42.48  2.11  92.64 
Santander - Stockmarket 100 Tracker Growth  -0.15  40.74  1.87  89.34 

Source: FE Analytics

Liontrust FTSE 100 Tracker has had a consistently lower tracking error, but it is more expensive, with a TER of 0.46 per cent.  

The Santander portfolio has a minimum investment of £500.



 
Add your comment
Step 1: Tell us what you think...
 

Step 2: Prove you're not a robot...
You don't have to do this every time you submit a comment.

Login or register free and you won't see it again.
Enter the words above:
Step 3: Submit your comment...
Submit
 
Steve S Jul 31st, 2012 at 03:40 PM

Better to buy the new Vanguard UK FTSE100 tracker ETF (VUKE) which only charges 0.1% TER and has no stamp duty.

Reply
grumpysculler Jul 18th, 2012 at 03:50 PM

Vanguard only has a £100k minimum if you invest direct. Invest via a platform and it is much more reasonable.

Reply
Theo Jul 18th, 2012 at 03:32 PM

You did well to draw attention to the outrageous charges of the Halifax index tracker(1.5%). For a company of that standing and background to carry on robbing their customers to that extent, beggars belief. I wonder who were the IFAS who put their customers into that tracker. They not only damage the standing of their profession but also are probably liable to damages at law.

Even Virgin with FUM over £2bln and supposed to cater for the small man, have a TER of 1.00%

The HSBC index trackers reduced their TER about 3 years(?) ago and so their tracking errors beyond that time are not representative of the current situation. This may also apply to other trackers too.

Reply
Rob Davies Jul 18th, 2012 at 01:33 PM

The TER does not include all costs. Total cost of ownership (TCO) does and that can be quite different from the TER.

Reply
 

Back to top of page

 

Follow FE Trustnet

Video Headlines

More Videos

Why you should ignore the "slowdown" in emerging markets

GMT 12:30 | 04-Jun-2013

Why income investors cannot afford to ignore emerging markets

GMT 17:00 | 01-Jun-2013

 
Poll

Would you invest in a fund managed by someone who is nearing retirement age?

Yes

No

Vote

 
 
  • Stay connected with FE trustnet
  • Authorised and Regulated by the
    Financial Conduct Authority
  • © Trustnet Limited 2013. All Rights Reserved.
  • Please read our Terms of Use / Disclaimer
    and Privacy and Cookie Policy.
  • Data supplied in conjunction with Thomson Financial Limited,
    London Stock Exchange Plc, StructuredRetailProducts.com
    and ManorPark.com