Your Basket
Your Basket
There are no funds in your basket. To add funds to your basket use the Green Plus Icon wherever you see it next to a fund.
Fund name
Aberdeen American Growth  
Fidelity American  
Schroder UK Mid 250  
M&G Recovery  
Jupiter Merlin UK Growth  
Close Basket Open basket

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 

Pension pots crippled by falling gilt yields

The cutting of annuity rates could raise the popularity of overseas pension schemes, which are not dependent on gilt yields.

By Megan Pollard, Reporter, FE Trustnet
Tuesday July 24, 2012


Speculation that Spain will have to seek a full-blown bailout has put millions of pensioners at risk of massive losses, according to deVere Group’s chief executive Nigel Green (pictured)

ALT_TAGApproximately £29bn was wiped off the value of the FTSE 100 yesterday, after Spanish government borrowing costs soared to a new euro-era high of 7.5 per cent. 

As a result, 10-year gilt yields have approached all-time lows, currently hovering around the 1.48 per cent mark. 

The FTSE is again down today – 0.17 per cent at the time of writing – and Green fears the situation could get even worse for investors approaching retirement unless a permanent solution to the eurozone crisis is fleshed out.

"This is disastrous for pension pots as the vast majority of all pensions and savings are linked, at least in part, to shares," he explained. 

"The crisis in Europe is driving many investors into the gilts of ‘safe haven’ Britain, which is pushing up their price, reducing their yield and forcing annuity providers to cut rates to historic lows." 

"This means those on the cusp of retirement are destined to have a permanently lower level of retirement income."

The deVere Group says the ongoing eurozone saga is prompting an increasing number of pension holders to consider transferring their investments outside the UK. 

He commented: "Retirees are becoming poorer due to low annuity rates."

"Therefore, to get the most from their retirement income, a growing number of those who can, namely expatriates, are moving their pensions into an HM Revenue & Customs-recognised QROPS [qualified recognised overseas pension scheme], because buying an annuity with a QROPS is not mandatory." 

"With the storm clouds continuing to gather over the eurozone, we expect demand for QROPS to continue to soar," he added.

The bad news for UK pensions follows Green’s recent criticism of the latest round of quantitative easing, which is one of the principal reasons why gilt yields are so low at present.  

"Another round of quantitative easing means more misery for millions of people on the cusp of retirement, who have already seen their pension incomes slashed by almost a fifth since the ‘stimulus’ initiative was introduced in 2009," he said.



 
Add your comment
Step 1: Tell us what you think...
 

Step 2: Prove you're not a robot...
You don't have to do this every time you submit a comment.

Login or register free and you won't see it again.
Enter the words above:
Step 3: Submit your comment...
Submit
 
j Aug 27th, 2012 at 05:46 PM

deVere Group approached us and tried to get us to transfer the company´s stocks and shares to them into one or more of their funds. They also wanted to invest our cash

We did due diligence Googled NAME OF COMPANY + scam and our suspicions were confirmed. Alright a lot of the complaints were from ex employees.

In our humble opinion pensioners are better off investing in respectable public companies paying good dividends rather than investing through a management company and paying their fees.

A lot of pensioners in the USA are turning to mREITs for their attractive yields of 10 to 15% for example AGNC NLY & IVR and RSO have recently had good write ups - the dividends paid every 3 months

Reply
David Jul 25th, 2012 at 02:09 PM

The current rules mean that even though I am using income drawdown I cannot even withdraw all the dividend income which my pension pot receives. The yield is currently 5.5% but I can only take 5% from the pot. As a result the pot is growing in value and will continue to do so as long as I am alive. Then HMRC will take 55%. So the rules are designed to maximise HMRC slice.

Reply
Dave Collard Jul 25th, 2012 at 01:16 PM

It's time for the government to provide state backed guaranteed annuities at a pro-rata rate of £10K per £100K pot handed over to the Treasury. Problem solved and an incentive to get people saving for their retirement.

Reply
Theo Jul 24th, 2012 at 08:18 PM

It is good to know of the existence of loopholes such as QROPS and short term annuities. But why would any one who is not completely mad, consider entering any pension scheme outside that run by his employer? (Even that is doubtful).

Reply
Warren Peace Jul 24th, 2012 at 04:28 PM

If only UK annuities were underpinned by Spanish gilts...

Seriously though, someone retiring at age 65 will currently get around 5.5% via drawdown, fixed for 3 years (but with the possibility of increased income 3 years hence) or a similar amount via a lifetime annuity, fixed forever. From this I infer average longevity of only 18 years even allowing for mortality gain/loss. Annuitants are getting a raw deal based on what are effectively false gilts yields. The Government keep talking about immorality in the taxation world but a major contributor to falling gilt yields is QE...

Reply
Ark Welder Jul 24th, 2012 at 03:31 PM

Is this article really old? I ask because:

a) people on the cusp of retirement are NOT destined to have a 'permanently lower level of retirement income' if they do their (own) homework. A short-term annuity with a life up to 5 years can be used, after which a lifetime annuity could be bought, or even a new short-term annuity - both paying out at rates that are appropriate at that time. Alternatively, a drawdown option that will avoid annuities completely.

b) Buying an annuity with a UK pension fund is not mandatory (at least with a SIPP it isn't). Income drawdown, followed by an Alternative Secured Pension might be used. Not for everyone in all cases - but for those that it isn't, QROPS is unlikely to be either.

Reply
ester11 Jul 24th, 2012 at 09:23 PM

I had fun reading this article. There are a lot of inexactities.

First no one has to buy an annuity and there is no legal requirement to retire.

There is some inexatities in the comments as well. There is no guarantee that if a fixed annuity is bought you could be better off. Gilts yileds could be even lower in 5 years (see Japan) and with the improvements in life expectancy and use of unisex annuities you could be a lot worse.

Probably one has to think if he can afford investment loses or not. Risk capacity is important when chossing not to take a guaranteed income (annuity). There is also the mortality drag and the reverse pound cost averaging which could affect someone chossing pension drawdown.

There are people for which a combination of an annuity and pension drawdown could be the solution. The annuity could supplement the state pension to cover the essential expenditure and the pension drawdown will cover non-essential expenditure.

Reply
 

Back to top of page

 

Follow FE Trustnet

Video Headlines

More Videos

Gleeson: The fund I’d back to hit a short-term target

GMT 07:00 | 15-May-2013

Gray: Market rally has made me more bearish than ever

GMT 15:30 | 30-Apr-2013

 
Poll

Do you own an Asia Pacific ex Japan fund that isn't run by Aberdeen or First State?

Yes

No

Vote

 
 
  • Stay connected with FE trustnet
  • Authorised and Regulated by the
    Financial Conduct Authority
  • © Trustnet Limited 2013. All Rights Reserved.
  • Please read our Terms of Use / Disclaimer
    and Privacy and Cookie Policy.
  • Data supplied in conjunction with Thomson Financial Limited,
    London Stock Exchange Plc, StructuredRetailProducts.com
    and ManorPark.com