Your Basket
Your Basket
There are no funds in your basket. To add funds to your basket use the Green Plus Icon wherever you see it next to a fund.
Fund name
Aberdeen American Growth  
Fidelity American  
Schroder UK Mid 250  
M&G Recovery  
Jupiter Merlin UK Growth  
Close Basket Open basket

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 

RDR flooding market with “confusing” Specialist funds

The growing popularity of the IMA’s most ambiguous sector ahead of RDR's January introduction has led critics to wonder if the new regulations will make the industry less transparent instead of more so.

By Thomas McMahon, Reporter, FE Trustnet Follow
Wednesday July 25, 2012


RDR is driving an increase in the number of funds in the IMA Specialist sector, leading some critics to raise questions about the programme's effectiveness before it has even been introduced.  

Thames River Multi-Capital’s latest FundWatch report shows fund launches were down from 32 in the fourth quarter of 2011 to 18 in the first quarter of 2012, with six of the new portfolios classed as specialist. 

Three of these funds were from Invesco Perpetual’s Balanced Risk series, which aims to target a volatility range and comply with the requirements of the Retail Distribution Review (RDR). 

Gary Potter, co-head of the F&C Thames River Multi-Capital team, commented: "With too many funds in the market for investors to choose from already, it is pleasing to see a drop-off in the number of funds launched to UK investors in Q1." 

"What FundWatch does show is an increasing number of funds being launched in the Specialist sector, which cannot be accommodated by mainstream sectors, including risk-rated funds."

"These are becoming increasingly popular with advisers looking for solutions to efficiently classify risk for their clients." 

"This is a trend we expect to continue over the next quarter as the deadline for RDR implementation looms near." 

Tim Cockerill, head of collectives research at Rowan Dartington, says that Specialist sector funds present an extra hurdle for investors.

"It’s a difficult sector to compare funds in because you have such a mish-mash, so you can’t run a straightforward analysis of it." 

Data from FE Analytics shows that a range of Allianz RiskMaster funds have been launched in the past three months, supporting the trend towards risk-targeted portfolios. 

These funds are a relatively new concept and often find themselves in the Specialist sector due to the lack of a more appropriate destination.

Cockerill advises investors to do their homework carefully before buying into products such as these. 

"When asset managers come up with new strategies, sometimes they are responding to investors’ needs, but sometimes they come up with an idea they think they can create a market for," he said. 

Other funds launched into the sector since the end of the study period include multi-manager portfolios Sarasin Global Equity Fund of Funds and Sarasin Global Diversified Fund of Funds. 

Multi-manager funds are also not currently classed together in a sector, making it harder for investors to find meaningful information on how they compare. 

According to FundWatch, in the second quarter the new fund with the best ranking in comparison to its peer group was Harry Nimmo's Standard Life Global Smaller Companies. 

It was a fifth-percentile performer in the IMA Global sector, although in absolute terms it lost 0.54 per cent of its value. 

Performance of fund vs sector since launch

ALT_TAG

Source: FE Analytics

According to FE data, the portfolio is up 4.26 per cent since its launch in January 2012, compared with a loss of 2.34 per cent from the average Global fund. 

The worst absolute performance for a new fund was that of the M&G International Specialist Equity fund, from the IMA Global sector, which fell by 8.56 per cent. 

Run by David Williams – who is also the deputy manager of the £7bn M&G Recovery fund – the new offering was launched as a result of the merger between the Prudential Global Growth trust and new assets. 

FundWatch also lists the sectors with the highest number of consistently performing funds over the past three years. 

Only 180 out of a possible 1,237 funds consistently delivered above-average returns in the period, with the IMA Global Bond and IMA Sterling Strategic Bond sectors the worst performers. 

The IMA Global Emerging Market sector was the most consistent, a second vote of confidence in the sector after Bestinvest’s dog fund report showed it had the fewest underperformers over a three-year period



 
Add your comment
Step 1: Tell us what you think...
 

Step 2: Prove you're not a robot...
You don't have to do this every time you submit a comment.

Login or register free and you won't see it again.
Enter the words above:
Step 3: Submit your comment...
Submit
 
Be the first to comment on this Research Article.

 

Follow FE Trustnet

Video Headlines

More Videos

Why you should ignore the "slowdown" in emerging markets

GMT 12:30 | 04-Jun-2013

Why income investors cannot afford to ignore emerging markets

GMT 17:00 | 01-Jun-2013

 
Poll

Would you invest in a fund managed by someone who is nearing retirement age?

Yes

No

Vote

 
 
  • Stay connected with FE trustnet
  • Authorised and Regulated by the
    Financial Conduct Authority
  • © Trustnet Limited 2013. All Rights Reserved.
  • Please read our Terms of Use / Disclaimer
    and Privacy and Cookie Policy.
  • Data supplied in conjunction with Thomson Financial Limited,
    London Stock Exchange Plc, StructuredRetailProducts.com
    and ManorPark.com