Your Basket
Your Basket
There are no funds in your basket. To add funds to your basket use the Green Plus Icon wherever you see it next to a fund.
Fund name
Aberdeen American Growth  
Fidelity American  
Schroder UK Mid 250  
M&G Recovery  
Jupiter Merlin UK Growth  
Close Basket Open basket

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 

An alternative to M&G Corporate Bond

The £6.3bn vehicle is the go-to fund for those looking for corporate bond exposure, but investors may have to soon look elsewhere.

By Joshua Ausden, News Editor Follow
Thursday August 02, 2012


M&G’s decision to slow inflows into its M&G Corporate Bond and Strategic Corporate Bond funds has come as a big blow to many in the industry. Star manager Richard Woolnough is a favourite with multi-managers, private investors and IFAs looking for corporate bond exposure, and so the prospect of these funds soft-closing may leave many scratching their heads.

There are a number of alternatives in the IMA Sterling Corporate Bond sector, but one that has garnered particular interest of late is the Henderson Sterling Bond.

The £482m portfolio has prospered under the management of Stephen Thariyan and Philip Payne since their appointments in April 2009. As a result, both have recently been made FE Alpha Managers, and the fund was awarded five crowns in the latest FE Fund Crown Rating rebalancing.

Performance of funds and sector over 3yrs

ALT_TAG
Source: FE Analytics

According to FE data, the fund has returned 54.02 per cent over three years, outperforming its sector average by exactly 23 per cent, and Woolonough’s £6.3bn M&G Corporate Bond fund by 20.1 per cent. Thariyan and Payne’s portfolio has been slightly more volatile than its rival, but has a lower maximum drawdown over the period.

With returns of 8.96 per cent, the fund has also outperformed its sector over one year – though falls slightly behind M&G Corporate Bond, which has delivered 11.42 per cent.

Both Henderson and M&G portfolios are yielding 3.7 per cent.

A disastrous 2008 under previous manager Philip Roantree means the fund remains bottom quartile over a five year period. Roantree – now at Querns Asset Management – lost 29.46 per cent over the 12 month period, compared to just -9.76 per cent from its IMA Sterling Corporate Bond sector average and benchmark.

Performance of funds and sector over 5yrs

ALT_TAG 
Source: FE Analytics

However, Thariyan and Payne have turned things around, and are now clearly a force to be reckoned with.

The managers currently have a preference for investment grade bonds, which make up 94 per cent of assets under management. The vast majority of this exposure is in A and BBB-rated debt – an area which Thariyan and Payne think strikes a fine balance between quality and value.

The fund has a small degree of exposure to gilts, but at 2.2 per cent, Henderson Sterling Bond is very much a play on corporate debt rather than sovereign debt.

Top-10 positions include options in Walmart, Johnson & Johnson, HSBC and Imperial Tobacco Finance.

The fund has a minimum investment of £1,000 and a top-up of £100, and it has a total expense ratio (TER) of 1.45 per cent.

Payne also manages the Henderson All Stocks Credit and Long Dated Credit portfolio – both in the Corporate Bond sector and over £1bn in assets under management – while Thariyan heads up the FE five-crown rated Henderson Credit Alpha fund, which sits in IMA Absolute Return.



 
Add your comment
Step 1: Tell us what you think...
 

Step 2: Prove you're not a robot...
You don't have to do this every time you submit a comment.

Login or register free and you won't see it again.
Enter the words above:
Step 3: Submit your comment...
Submit
 
Mahan Aug 04th, 2012 at 09:29 AM

Can anyone tell me what effect "soft closing" a fund has on the present holders?

Reply
Ark Welder Aug 06th, 2012 at 03:42 PM

It should have no effect. You should still be able to add to your existing holding, either monthly or lump sums. Soft closure means that the fund is closed off to new investors. Specific details should be available from either the web-site, or from customer services, of the relevant fund house.

Reply
IFA Aug 02nd, 2012 at 04:36 PM

Did you manage to get 53% total return over 5 years from Cash Deposits vs M&G Corporate Bond Theo.......? Thought not. Plus you lose access to capital in Fixed Rate Bonds, funds are more liquid.

I would pick M&G every time. Yield does not equate to total performance.

Reply
Theo Aug 02nd, 2012 at 02:42 PM

Both Woolnough and Thariyan/Payne have done very well, but your two graphs are very important as they illustrate brilliantly how fund houses can change the impression of fund performance given to investors by selecting the time period that suits them.

I am not quite convinced by T&P's record. The 3 years they have had are the minimum period required, not the optimum and they only had rising markets. W showed his skill in both rising and falling markets. In spite of his 4 crowns against 5 for his rivals, he wins hands down and the rush of investors to him is, to my mind, well justified.

That being said, I would not invest in any bond fund yielding 3.7%. I can get more from a term deposit and no risk.

Reply
Ark Welder Aug 02nd, 2012 at 02:01 PM

Whilst I am a proponent of always going to fund-managers' web-sites for up-to-date information, it would still be nice if the Trustnet factsheets were to be consistent in their presentation of data.

Neither of the factsheets for the M&G bonds show the credit breakdown of the underlying assets, whereas the Henderson factsheet almost does: almost, because it has a separate entry for gilts rather than including them in their (currently) relevant credit rating.

The M&G factsheets show the geographic spread of the institutions that have issued the bonds held, whereas for Henderson they are all lumped together as 'UK' - even though six of the top ten are non-UK companies.

There are similar situations with other bond funds, and in other bond sectors.


And from all sources (so, fund houses and Trustnet, etc) two nice-to-haves would be to show separately the percentages allocated to government bonds, and to index-linked bonds (which would invariably mean separate listing for IL and non-IL government bonds). All just to make the initial research a bit lazier.. sorry, meant easier!

Reply
 

Back to top of page

 

Follow FE Trustnet

Video Headlines

More Videos

Why you should ignore the "slowdown" in emerging markets

GMT 12:30 | 04-Jun-2013

Why income investors cannot afford to ignore emerging markets

GMT 17:00 | 01-Jun-2013

 
Poll

Would you invest in a fund managed by someone who is nearing retirement age?

Yes

No

Vote

 
 
  • Stay connected with FE trustnet
  • Authorised and Regulated by the
    Financial Conduct Authority
  • © Trustnet Limited 2013. All Rights Reserved.
  • Please read our Terms of Use / Disclaimer
    and Privacy and Cookie Policy.
  • Data supplied in conjunction with Thomson Financial Limited,
    London Stock Exchange Plc, StructuredRetailProducts.com
    and ManorPark.com