Your Basket
Your Basket
There are no funds in your basket. To add funds to your basket use the Green Plus Icon wherever you see it next to a fund.
Fund name
Aberdeen American Growth  
Fidelity American  
Schroder UK Mid 250  
M&G Recovery  
Jupiter Merlin UK Growth  
Close Basket Open basket

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 

Leading IFAs cut "risky" emerging market exposure

All three FE AFI indices reflect a growing cautiousness among industry experts.

By Thomas McMahon, Reporter Follow
Tuesday August 07, 2012


Advisers on the panel of the FE Adviser Fund Index (AFI) are recommending a shift into cautious asset classes such as fixed interest and away from emerging markets and other international equities, according to the data from the latest rebalancing of the portfolios.  

The FE indices collect the fund and asset allocation recommendations of a panel of industry experts, meaning that they track the sentiment and opinions of investment professionals about funds and sectors.

The most adventurous of the three AFI indices, the AFI Aggressive Index, slashed its exposure to the Asia Pacific region by 25 per cent since the last rebalancing six months ago, while the AFI Balanced Index reduced its exposure to international equities by 7 per cent.

Oliver Clarke-Williams, investment product consultant at FE, said: “Across the board, advisers are taking risk off the table and the three FE AFI indices have converged closer together than in previous rebalancings.”

“We have seen a reversal of the trend which saw advisers reduce their exposure to corporate bonds in the November 2011 rebalancing. All indices have seen inflows into this asset class, suggesting that corporate debt is perceived as the nearest thing to a safe haven in these turbulent times.”

AXA Framlington UK Select Opportunities was advisers’ top fund pick for aggressive investors and made it into the top three fund choices for the other indices. M&G Optimal Income was the favourite for both Balanced and Cautious investors.

AXA Framlington UK Select Opportunities, managed by FE Alpha Manager Nigel Thomas, is in the top quartile of the IMA UK All Companies sector over one, three, five and ten year periods, having returned 208.05 per cent to investors over a decade.

Performance of fund versus sector over 10yrs

ALT_TAG

Source: FE Analytics

M&G Optimal Income has made 60.17 per cent to investors over five years, top quartile returns for the IMA Sterling Strategic Bond sector.

Performance of fund versus sector over 5yrs

ALT_TAG

Source: FE Analytics

The fund is managed by FE Alpha Manager Richard Woolnough, who gave his view on the outlook for the markets to FE Trustnet last month

The panel selecting the AFI portfolios has been boosted by the addition of Mark Wright, investment analyst at AFH Wealth Management, and Alex Brandreth, deputy fund manager at private bank Brown Shipley.

The indices are rebalanced twice a year and this latest review, effective 1 August 2012, marks their 16th season.



 
Add your comment
Step 1: Tell us what you think...
 

Step 2: Prove you're not a robot...
You don't have to do this every time you submit a comment.

Login or register free and you won't see it again.
Enter the words above:
Step 3: Submit your comment...
Submit
 
Ned Ludd Aug 09th, 2012 at 11:03 AM

It seems odd to me. What are the choices? "Risky" emerging markets, or developed markets which are currently seeing growth estimates severely downgraded, and where the eurozone still has very considerable political risk.

Reply
Theo Aug 08th, 2012 at 12:11 AM

Strange to be reading of IFAs going off emerging mkts, on the same day another article is telling us of soft closures of funds in Asia Pac. and Em.Mkts.

Reply
Trebor norfolk Aug 07th, 2012 at 04:40 PM

Last week we were told the only place to invest was asia & emerging markets,and equities not bonds, I am confused by this latest comment.

Reply
Andrew Alexander Aug 08th, 2012 at 12:15 PM

Ok, for the 3rd time now, my comment has been deleted. In respodning to Trebor's comment above, which alludes to the fact that trustnet articles seem to chop and change the pervailing viewpoint from one day to the next, I stated

"Simple; ignore the advice given by Trustnet reporters."

Now this is the 5th comment on this article, as detailed above; yet this is only the 3rd shown. Trustnet in censorship shocker?

Reply
The FE Trustnet team Aug 08th, 2012 at 12:41 PM

Andrew,

We welcome comments, and often reply to those who make constructive criticisms on our stories. As you have now fully explained the reasoning for your comment, i will indeed reply.

We present contrasting views from industry professionals - we have no agenda, and do not allow our own judgements to affect the copy we are writing. If two industry professionals say contrasting things, we do not select one and ignore the other - we allow the readers to make up their own minds.

This is not advice - it's a website that gives professionals a platform to speak to investors.

Many thanks,

The FE Trustnet team.

Reply
 

Back to top of page

 

Follow FE Trustnet

Video Headlines

More Videos

Why you should ignore the "slowdown" in emerging markets

GMT 12:30 | 04-Jun-2013

Why income investors cannot afford to ignore emerging markets

GMT 17:00 | 01-Jun-2013

 
Poll

Would you invest in a fund managed by someone who is nearing retirement age?

Yes

No

Vote

 
 
  • Stay connected with FE trustnet
  • Authorised and Regulated by the
    Financial Conduct Authority
  • © Trustnet Limited 2013. All Rights Reserved.
  • Please read our Terms of Use / Disclaimer
    and Privacy and Cookie Policy.
  • Data supplied in conjunction with Thomson Financial Limited,
    London Stock Exchange Plc, StructuredRetailProducts.com
    and ManorPark.com