Your Basket
Your Basket
There are no funds in your basket. To add funds to your basket use the Green Plus Icon wherever you see it next to a fund.
Fund name
Aberdeen American Growth  
Fidelity American  
Schroder UK Mid 250  
M&G Recovery  
Jupiter Merlin UK Growth  
Close Basket Open basket

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 

Investors "over-exposed" to equity income

While there are sound reasons for investing in dividend paying companies, experts say investors must be careful not to let the asset class dominate their portfolio.

By Mark Smith, senior reporter Follow
Thursday August 09, 2012


Investors who have bought into the heavily marketed equity income story may be dangerously over-exposed, say leading IFAs.

A combination of low interest rates and high inflation has pushed investors into high-yielding, defensive stocks. Couple this with record low government bond yields, a growth forecast of zero and persisting uncertainty in the eurozone and it’s no surprise that investors are tempted to double-up on their most successful dividend giants.

The latest FE Trustnet poll shows that three in 10 investors – 28 per cent – have more than half of their portfolio invested in equity income stocks.
ALT_TAG 
In light of Ruffer’s Steve Russell's prediction earlier this week that equity income stocks are in danger of becoming a bubble, Adrian Lowcock, senior investment adviser at Bestinvest, says that investors need to careful they don’t over-expose themselves.

“Half of your portfolio in equity income stocks sounds a little on the high side to me,” he said. “Equity income is attractive at the moment but investors need to make sure they diversify – there is limited choice in the UK.” 

“People shouldn’t exclude other asset classes. We’re really positive about the opportunities in high yield bonds and still recommend fixed income assets for more cautious investors.”

Lowcock says the figures are particularly worrying given that many investors only invest in the UK for their equity income exposure.

“The trend for dividends is spreading overseas and there are a number of funds focused on equity income strategies in the US, Asia, globally, and now in emerging markets as well,” he added. 

While Hargreaves Lansdown’s Richard Troue believes that there is still plenty of opportunity in equity income stocks, he doesn't think investors should buy into the story at the expense of diversification.

“The risk of any asset class becoming inflated is something that investors always need to keep in the back of their mind,” he said. “With interest rates remaining low and inflation struggling to come down below the Bank of England's target then we’ve seen a growing appetite for high yielding shares. This has led some to speculate that high quality, defensive stocks are becoming overvalued.”

“I would suggest that exposure of more than 50 per cent to equity income stocks is too high for the majority of investors, especially if that exposure is concentrated in the biggest, FTSE dividend payers.”

Troue adds that it is probably too early for investors to be concerned of an equity income bubble, but thinks it's an area all investors should keep an eye on.

He commented: “In the short- and medium-term I don’t see interest rates rising or government’s pursuing quantitative easing aggressively enough to bring about rapid inflation so we remain positive about high dividend stocks for their ability to provide an attractive and growing income to compensate for low growth in the economy and negative yields in other assets.”

Star manager Neil Woodford, agrees. Even against the backdrop of a potential break-up of the eurozone, the legendary investor – who runs more than £20bn of UK investors money across his Invesco Perpetual Income and High Income portfolios – says that cash-generative, high yielding companies have a long way to run.

“Ultimately, I am confident that my preference for investing in quality, dependable growth companies at attractive valuations will provide decent long-term returns for my portfolios,” he said in a recent blog.



 
Add your comment
Step 1: Tell us what you think...
 

Step 2: Prove you're not a robot...
You don't have to do this every time you submit a comment.

Login or register free and you won't see it again.
Enter the words above:
Step 3: Submit your comment...
Submit
 
Theo Aug 09th, 2012 at 01:10 PM

If someone is buying his house, has a reasonable amount in a cash ISAs and Build.Soc. deposits, I can see nothing wrong in having even 100% of his portfolio in equity income funds.

The only problem is that yields in these funds (eg. 3.65% from IP Income) are getting too low and if they get any lower, we shall have no where else to go.

Reply
 

Back to top of page

 

Follow FE Trustnet

Video Headlines

More Videos

Why you should ignore the "slowdown" in emerging markets

GMT 12:30 | 04-Jun-2013

Why income investors cannot afford to ignore emerging markets

GMT 17:00 | 01-Jun-2013

 
Poll

Would you invest in a fund managed by someone who is nearing retirement age?

Yes

No

Vote

 
 
  • Stay connected with FE trustnet
  • Authorised and Regulated by the
    Financial Conduct Authority
  • © Trustnet Limited 2013. All Rights Reserved.
  • Please read our Terms of Use / Disclaimer
    and Privacy and Cookie Policy.
  • Data supplied in conjunction with Thomson Financial Limited,
    London Stock Exchange Plc, StructuredRetailProducts.com
    and ManorPark.com