Your Basket
Your Basket
There are no funds in your basket. To add funds to your basket use the Green Plus Icon wherever you see it next to a fund.
Fund name
Aberdeen American Growth  
Fidelity American  
Schroder UK Mid 250  
M&G Recovery  
Jupiter Merlin UK Growth  
Close Basket Open basket

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 

Equity income giants "little more than trackers"

Some of the biggest funds in the UK Equity Income sector fail to add significant value to the FTSE All Share.

By Thomas McMahon, Reporter Follow
Thursday August 09, 2012


Some of the largest UK equity income funds do little more than track their index and should be charging tracker fees, according to FE Alpha Manager John McClure (pictured).

ALT_TAG McClure, who manages the £44.7m Unicorn UK Income fund, says that the increasingly popular sector is populated by unimaginatively-run funds that pile into the same big dividend-paying blue-chips.

“Some of them are never far away from the index, so for me I think they should charge index tracker fees. They think 10 per cent over or under their benchmark is a huge view, but that’s not true at all,” he said.

“I understand scalability, and we are small, so we can do things they can’t, but there’s no excuse for just following an index.”

Yesterday FE Trustnet research showed that a high proportion of UK equity income funds held big positions in the same few stocks in their top-10 holdings.

A comparison of the performance of the 11 funds in the sector over £1bn in size and the FTSE All Share shows a close fit, adding credence to McClure’s claims.

Performance of funds versus index over 5yrs

ALT_TAG

Source: FE Analytics

McLure acknowledges that 50 per cent of the income from the FTSE 350 comes from nine stocks, reducing the options for the managers of the biggest funds, but he says that it is possible to run large equity income funds without slavishly following the index.

Neil Woodford, for example, takes a view – he moves in or out of BP or Shell. What I don’t like about some of the others is they don’t take a view,” he said.

According to data from FE Analytics, using the FTSE All Share as a benchmark, the Alpha of the 11 funds ranges between -2.24 per cent and 2.47 per cent. The average fund in this group has a total expense ratio (TER) of 1.47 per cent. 

By comparison, the Allianz UK Index, which is an All Share tracker, has an alpha of 2.78 per cent and a TER of 0.7 per cent.

It should be pointed out, however, that all 11 of these funds are yielding more than the tracker, which currently has a one year historic yield of 2.98 per cent. 

Neil Woodford’s Invesco Perpetual High Income has the highest alpha score of the giant funds, while Unicorn UK Income records 6.87 per cent. 

McClure's portfolio invests down the market cap scale, and has the highest returns of any fund in the sector over three and five years; it yields 4.37 per cent.

Performance of fund versus sector over 5yrs

ALT_TAG 
Source: FE Analytics

“We move down to the mid to small cap space and look for companies with a record of paying a dividend for a sustained period of time. James Halstead, for example, has increased its dividend in each of the past 25 years,” McClure said.



 
Add your comment
Step 1: Tell us what you think...
 

Step 2: Prove you're not a robot...
You don't have to do this every time you submit a comment.

Login or register free and you won't see it again.
Enter the words above:
Step 3: Submit your comment...
Submit
 
Holman Aug 10th, 2012 at 02:16 PM

If you look at the corresponding Giants in the investment trust arena, then you get the same tracking but at a discount. No brainer.

Reply
Theo Aug 09th, 2012 at 03:45 PM

It would have been far more useful to show a table with the names, alpha and TER of the 11 funds you studied rather than give odd figures about them in the text. Fear of displeasing customers is the bane of good financial writing.

Reply
Andrew Alexander Aug 09th, 2012 at 12:34 PM

So, which ones?

Come one Trustnet, this is possibly the worst article I have read on your website. This is simply a marketing piece for Unicorn, nothing more.

Reply
Roddi Aug 10th, 2012 at 01:46 AM

This is the third time I've seen you make a critical comment without any conceivable point. If you have nothing useful to say, say nothing.

Reply
Andrew Alexander Aug 10th, 2012 at 12:24 PM

The conceivable point, Roddi my old son, is that the headline highlights that their are certain large equity income funds which are "little more than trackers". However, the article does not offer any evidence of this, nevermind the funds which this headline applies to.

I await your counterpoint.

Reply
Roddi Aug 12th, 2012 at 10:18 AM

Yes, the article would have been better with a table of the 11 funds, but does this mean it loses all relevance? No, it doesn't. There is plenty of evidence throughout the piece, namely the graph on the first page, as well as the references to Alpha.

But perhaps you just enjoy criticising others for the sake of it? Who knows...

Reply
ant3020 Aug 09th, 2012 at 01:35 PM

And I think you'll find divi dropped last year so statement is also false

Reply
 

Back to top of page

 

Follow FE Trustnet

Video Headlines

More Videos

Gray: Market rally has made me more bearish than ever

GMT 15:30 | 30-Apr-2013

From the analyst's desk

GMT 10:00 | 29-Apr-2013

 
Poll

Would you be concerned if a manager of a fund you owned took charge of another portfolio as well?

Yes

No

Vote

 
 
  • Stay connected with FE trustnet
  • Authorised and Regulated by the
    Financial Services Authority
  • © Trustnet Limited 2013. All Rights Reserved.
  • Please read our Terms of Use / Disclaimer
    and Privacy and Cookie Policy.
  • Data supplied in conjunction with Thomson Financial Limited,
    London Stock Exchange Plc, StructuredRetailProducts.com
    and ManorPark.com