Your Basket
Your Basket
There are no funds in your basket. To add funds to your basket use the Green Plus Icon wherever you see it next to a fund.
Fund name
Aberdeen American Growth  
Fidelity American  
Schroder UK Mid 250  
M&G Recovery  
Jupiter Merlin UK Growth  
Close Basket Open basket

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 

Don't buy into cheap markets myth, warns Sullivan

The FE Alpha Manager says Europe will have "got off lightly" if we go through a decade of Japanese style inflation.

By Joshua Ausden, News Editor Follow
Tuesday October 23, 2012


The constant references to cheap valuations in equity markets is misleading, according to MAM’s James Sullivan, who says the unprecedented macro environment makes historical comparisons completely worthless.

ALT_TAG Sullivan (pictured), an FE Alpha Manager who co-heads the CF Miton Special Situations and Strategic portfolios with Martin Gray, says the high levels of debt and stagnant growth in Western economies will ensure markets remain volatile for the foreseeable future.

Unless you have a particularly long time horizon, Sullivan believes investors should err on the side of caution, rather than blindly backing “cheap” markets.

“Historic price-to-earnings [P/E] ratios are worthless most of the time in my opinion, because the macro environment is always changing, but this is particularly the case now given what’s happened in the last five years,” he said.

“According to backward looking data, P/E ratios were at fair value in 1996 and 2007, and look what happened there. It’s complete nonsense – you’re not comparing apples with apples.”

Performance of indices over 20yrs

ALT_TAG
Source: FE Analytics

Sullivan believes there will be a time to back equities, but not until there are big changes in either the macro outlook, or in valuations.

“I’m not saying we need a resolution in the eurozone or the debt crisis in general to invest in equities,” he explained. “We need either that, or for prices to be much, much cheaper.”

“I think we’d need to see high single digit P/E’s and a yield of close to 5 per cent before we start buying aggressively.

The FTSE 100 is currently on a P/E ratio of around 11 times, and is yielding around 3.5 per cent.

Though Sullivan and Gray have the flexibility to invest up to 100 per cent in equities, the CF Miton Special Situations Portfolio currently has only 29 per cent in the market – the majority of which is in low beta, defensive plays.

Though some experts have pointed to dividend paying stocks as being overvalued, Sullivan says he is much more comfortable holding defensives over “cheaper” cyclicals.

“We prefer funds that focus on cash rich companies – the “titans”, which have high barriers to entry and the ability to buy back shares,” he said.

“If volatility persists in the way we expect, I believe it will be the cyclicals that break first, not the defensives.”

Sullivan thinks the expensiveness of dividend paying companies has been overstated.

“In three of the last four years, growth has outperformed,” he said. “It’s not like equity income is at the top and growth at the bottom.”

Year-on-year performance of sectors

 Name  2012 (%)  2011 (%)  2010(%)  2009 (%) 
 IMA UK All Companies  13.45  -7.04  17.53  30.40
 IMA UK Equity Income  12.76  -2.90  14.58  22.88

Source: FE Analytics

“There is a time and place for owning cyclicals, but it’s not right now.”

The fund has a significant degree exposure to the US dollar which has an inverse relationship with equity markets, thus acting as a hedge.

“We currently have 20 per cent in either T-bills [treasuries] or dollar-denominated assets. It’s a powerful hedge for the portfolio.”

One of the few areas that Sullivan is relatively optimistic about is Japan, which he believes is better insulated from Western problems than most markets.

“On a valuation metric, Japan is trading below book, has a yield of 2.5 per cent and relative to the FTSE 100 and S&P 500, is attractive,” he said. “Inflation is at 0.5 per cent, and if there is a catalyst, we could really see that market take off.”

Sullivan thinks Europe could be set for a lost decade for equities similar to the one experienced by Japan in the 1990s. The manager doesn’t believe quantitative easing (QE) will cause inflation for many years, and thinks deflation is a very real possibility.

“If we go through a Japanese-style period, I think we would have got off lightly,” he said. “Many countries haven’t even started the deleveraging phase yet, and austerity cuts are yet to be felt.”

“Our financial system is in far worse shape. Greece is now in its sixth year of recession, and it hardly looks like it’s on the road to recovery.”

The CF Miton Special Situations and Strategic portfolios are both fund of funds, and sit in the IMA Flexible Investment sector. According to FE data, Special Sits is a top decile performer over a 10 year period, with returns of 188.26 per cent. It is also significantly less volaitle, and has performed much better in down markets.

Performance of fund and sector over 10yrs

ALT_TAG
Source: FE Analytics

The Strategic Portfolio is only a second quartile performer, but has been even less volatile over the period.

They both have a minimum investment of £1,000, but the Special Sits portfolio is much cheaper, with a total expense ratio (TER) of 1.73 per cent compared to Strategic’s 2.13 per cent.

Gray began running the funds back in the late 1990s, and was joined by Sullivan in June 2008.



 
Add your comment
Step 1: Tell us what you think...
 

Step 2: Prove you're not a robot...
You don't have to do this every time you submit a comment.

Login or register free and you won't see it again.
Enter the words above:
Step 3: Submit your comment...
Submit
 
IFA Oct 23rd, 2012 at 12:24 PM

Martin Gray is the captain of this ship!

If there was another systemic drop, this fund would hold together very well. As part of a diverse portfolio, it is an excellent option to complement other strategies. Agreed, CF Miton hasn't had a strong record over 1 year, but neither did Neil Woodford in 2009-2010. Gray is a stalwart of the industry. Do not doubt his ability to preserve capital and make money with low volatility.

Reply
DavidStephen Oct 23rd, 2012 at 10:31 AM

Like so many managers in these articles Sullivan is trying to justify his poor recent performance.He has completely missed out on this year's rally with an increase of 2.2% in the Strategic Portfolio & a zero increase in the Special Situations Portfolio.

Reply
Paul IFA Oct 23rd, 2012 at 11:22 AM

Are you honestly criticising a fund manager for not taking part on this false rally? Come on - talk about the benefits of hindsight! I'd be more worried if a manager was blindly chasing a market that is going up for no reason.

Reply
DavidStephen Oct 23rd, 2012 at 11:48 AM

Yes I am Paul.
Firstly whatever happens now this is not a false rally it has already happened and Sullivan has missed out.
Clearly the managers of comparative funds such as Newton Real Return and Troy Trojan have the benefit of hindsight!

Reply
Paul IFA Oct 23rd, 2012 at 12:40 PM

I think you would have had similar problems with Gray and Sullivan in the build up to the dot com bubble, the build up to the financial crisis, and the build up to last summer's sell-off. Take a look at the performance data, and you'll see what i mean.

You can't be right 100% of the time, it's impossible and the nature of trading costs means you'd end up losing out anyway. It's about positioning your portfolio on at least a three year view.

Reply
DavidStephen Oct 23rd, 2012 at 01:09 PM

Newton RR is up 19.4% over three years whilst both Miton portfolios are up only just over 10%. Troy Trojan is however up 34.6%.
On a five year view Troy Trojan is up 47.5%, Newton RR is up 38.6%.Miton SS is up 24.6% and Miton Str is up 28.0%.
It would appear that Miton have underperformed on short, medium and long term periods.

Reply
Paul IFA Oct 23rd, 2012 at 01:32 PM

Long-term periods? I think we have very different views of what is long-term...

Yes, Trojan and Newton Real Return are indeed excellent funds, but it's important to understand why Miton has underperformed. They envisage severe shocks, and Newton don't to the same extent, so it's no wonder they haven't done as well during a false rally. And if you look at volatility, Miton wins hands down even though Newton prides itself as being an Ab Return fund.

Reply
DavidStephen Oct 23rd, 2012 at 01:52 PM

Thanks for the reply Paul.
I think we said all we can.

Reply
Paul IFA Oct 23rd, 2012 at 03:08 PM

Agreed! We clearly both have good taste..!

Reply
Truegrid Oct 23rd, 2012 at 09:35 AM

The TN fund fact sheets don't appear to give PE ratios, or have I missed something?

Reply
 

Back to top of page

 

Follow FE Trustnet

Video Headlines

More Videos

Why you should ignore the "slowdown" in emerging markets

GMT 12:30 | 04-Jun-2013

Why income investors cannot afford to ignore emerging markets

GMT 17:00 | 01-Jun-2013

 
Poll

Would you invest in a fund managed by someone who is nearing retirement age?

Yes

No

Vote

 
 
  • Stay connected with FE trustnet
  • Authorised and Regulated by the
    Financial Conduct Authority
  • © Trustnet Limited 2013. All Rights Reserved.
  • Please read our Terms of Use / Disclaimer
    and Privacy and Cookie Policy.
  • Data supplied in conjunction with Thomson Financial Limited,
    London Stock Exchange Plc, StructuredRetailProducts.com
    and ManorPark.com