To continue using this website, please tell us a
little about yourself:

This site uses cookies. Some of the cookies are essential for parts of the site to operate and have already been set. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but if you do, parts of the site may not work. To find out more about cookies on the website and how to delete cookies, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

I accept the FE Trustnet cookie policy

For more information Click here

Login

Login

Register

It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
 
You are here: Manager factsheet

Gordon Grender

FE Alpha Manager
GAM Sterling Management Ltd
pdfIcon Manager factsheet pdf    rss feed RSS Feed
FE Trustnet verdict
Overall, performing better than the peer group composite. Over a long track record, the manager has outperformed the peer group more often than not. Good stockpicking has had a material positive impact on results, which have tended to be relatively better in a falling market.
Manager profile
Gordon Grender is an independent Investment Adviser to a GAM US equity fund. Gordon has been associated with GAM since 1983 and has been actively involved in fund management in North American stock markets since 1974. Between 1964 and 1990, he was also associated with the London stockbroking firm Kitcat & Aitken. He is based in London.
Total return for Gordon Grender
 
Rolling Alpha Quartile: Discrete three year periods
Rolling Alpha Quartile shows a manager's alpha score in quartile terms, plotting his or her risk adjusted performance against all other managers in the UT & OEICs universe. The best managers are those who are consistently ranked in the first or second quartile.
 
Quartile 1
Quartile 2
Quartile 3
Quartile 4
 
 
 
 
 
7-43m
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
19-55m
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
31-67m
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
43-79m
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
55-91m
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discrete calendar year performance : Gordon Grender

Manager career performance
Discrete performance
  0-12m 12-24m 24-36m 36-48m 48-60m 60-72m 72-84m 84-96m 96-108m 108-120m
Gordon Grender 16.1 -1.8 33.6 8.5 11.3 25.9 5.9 -6.8 -7.9 -1.5
Peer Group Composite 17.4 5.5 30.3 6.7 15.2 18.3 -5.8 -9.1 6.5 -2.4
Over / Under -1.3 -7.3 3.3 1.8 -3.9 7.6 11.7 2.3 -14.4 0.9
Performance vs peer group composite: Gordon Grender
How a manager matches up against his peers gives you some idea of how talented he is. Very few managers perform equally well in rising and falling markets, so knowing which type of market a manager is capable of performing well within is also important.
 
Overall markets
Up
Outperformed peer group composite
6 years
out of a possible 10
 
Overall markets
Up
Underperformed peer group composite
4 years
out of a possible 10
 
Rising markets
UpDown
Outperformed peer group composite
3 years
out of a possible 7
 
Falling markets
UpDown
Outperformed peer group composite
3 years
out of a possible 3
Funds currently managed
Fund Sole/Co-managed Sector Periods
GAM North American Growth Lead manager IA North America since Jan 02 1985 to present
Funds managed previously
Fund Periods
GAM Star American Equity since Jul 06 1998 to fund close
News & Research: Related articles sector Sector fund Fund group Group manager Manager
Sector Investors turning ‘2008-bearish’: Is it time to sell that S&P 500 tracker or buy some more? By Daniel Lanyon  18-Aug-2015
Data provided by FE. Care has been taken to ensure that the information is correct, but FE neither warrants, represents nor guarantees the contents of information, nor does it accept any responsibility for errors, inaccuracies, omissions or any inconsistencies herein. Past performance does not predict future performance, it should not be the main or sole reason for making an investment decision. The value of investments and any income from them can fall as well as rise.