Connecting: 18.189.188.157
Forwarded: 18.189.188.157, 104.23.197.61:33584
Tracker funds beat structured products | Trustnet Skip to the content

Tracker funds beat structured products

11 April 2011

Tracker funds returned an average of £1,695 more than GEBs, based upon an investment of £10,000 over a five-year period.

By Lora Coventry,

Senior Reporter, Financial Express

Tracker funds tend to outperform National Savings and Investments (NSI) Guaranteed Equity Bonds (GEB), new research from the IMA shows.

A GEB is a type of structured product that offers investors returns linked to the FTSE100 index, with a guarantee of a full return of their initial investment if the FTSE falls over the five-year term.

The IMA released a statement saying: "Looking at the 10 GEB issues that have matured to date, an investor would have gained an average of £1,933 in each of the nine years the tracker fund outperformed, and would have lost only £449 the one year the tracker fund underperformed the GEB."

Both basic and higher rate taxpayers would have fared better with a tracker fund: a basic rate taxpayer would have received on average £1,695 more in returns than an investor in a GEB, while a higher rate taxpayer would have been on average £1,827 better off.

The study also found that the cost of dividends lost exceeded the cost of investing in a tracker fund.

The IMA statement continued: "Whereas investors in tracker funds benefit from the dividends paid out by FTSE100 companies, which are re-invested net of tax, GEB investors receive no dividends."

"Investors in GEBs have lost out on an average of £2,360 in dividends over the 10 GEBs that have matured to date. The cost of these lost dividends exceeds the net cost of investing in a tracker fund by between £1,332 and £1,900, based upon an investment of £10,000."

The research also looked at what a tracker fund investment might have returned over each of the past 107 years.

In 92 of the last 107 years, a five-year tracker investment would have delivered an average gain of £6,566 on the investor’s original capital.

In 15 of the last 107 years, a tracker fund investor would have made an average loss of £1,217.

Performance of GEB and tracker vehicles

  Maturity date
GEB return (£)
Tracker funds return (£)
Difference (£)
GEB 1
18/04/2007
11,559  13,822  2,263
GEB 2
29/08/2007 14,431  16,271  1,840
GEB 3
29/11/2007 14,579  16,979  2,400
GEB 4
09/04/2008 14,774  17,396  2,622
GEB 5
17/06/2008 13,529  15,787  2,258
GEB 6
25/11/2008
11,286  10,837  -449
GEB 7
19/05/2009 10,000  11,478  1,478
GEB 8
28/07/2009 11,200  12,022  822
GEB 9
10/11/2009 10,000  12,645  2,645
GEB 10
20/07/2010 10,207  11,275  1,068

Source: IMA

Editor's Picks

Loading...

Videos from BNY Mellon Investment Management

Loading...

Data provided by FE fundinfo. Care has been taken to ensure that the information is correct, but FE fundinfo neither warrants, represents nor guarantees the contents of information, nor does it accept any responsibility for errors, inaccuracies, omissions or any inconsistencies herein. Past performance does not predict future performance, it should not be the main or sole reason for making an investment decision. The value of investments and any income from them can fall as well as rise.