Connecting: 216.73.216.84
Forwarded: 216.73.216.84, 104.23.197.136:28810
The problem with cash | Trustnet Skip to the content

The problem with cash

31 July 2009

There are five key solutions to dealing with the risk of inflation hitting investors' portfolios.

By Richard Simmons,

Investment Manager, Credo Capital

After the meltdown of the last two years many investors have relaxed their grasp for growth. Hedge funds did not hedge, uncorrelated sectors correlated, houses turned out not to be as safe as houses. Above all there has been a massive decline in the authority of financial institutions.

The reputation of governments as guarantors of last resort has hardly fared better. Investors and savers interested more in protecting their capital than growing it see two ferocious dogs running at them, teeth bared – bankruptcy and inflation.

Inflation danger
ALT_TAG

Source: Financial Express Analytics

Credit risk is not a new concept but the idea that a major bank could default surprised and scared everybody. Governments default in their own way. Massive capital injections into banks, commercial paper and other asset markets have brought government deficits to unprecedented levels. The almost universal solution is inflation.

There is a more parochial way of looking at this. The three year gilt pays just over 2 per cent. Bank deposits might earn 3 or 4 per cent at a push. So how is it possible to retain liquidity, increase yield (and therefore compensate for the inflation risk) without taking too much credit risk? There are five product solutions. But each have their wrinkles.

TIPS or index-linked gilts give you government risk with an inflation protection kicker. The art is to buy them close to par or at issue. Since these instruments can be adjusted upwards only you will not be caught out in periods of deflation.

Dividend paying shares also contain a trap. Most of the higher yielding stocks are heavily indebted property investors or utilities. Your dividend is being paid by increasing leverage and may not be sustainable. Other large payers, like Man Group and Pearson, may have volatile operating businesses, unable to fulfil the dividend 'promise' in all economies. Which leads us to…

Bonds. If well chosen these can have almost the opposite risk profile to the high dividend yielding stocks. A properly analysed bond will pay out in most situations and, even in default, will preserve capital. The paradox in this case is that many bond funds are concentrated on bank risk, the worst sector for certainty.

Some companies are able to provide value at both the dividend and bond level. Cable & Wireless, the international telecoms group, has strong cash flows that easily service its modest net debt. Its well covered dividend offers a current yield of 6 per cent. But its bonds, which by definition are even safer than the shares, produce an annual return of 7 per cent over the next three years.

To round off the set let me mention Preference Shares and their junior partners Zero Dividend Prefs. These are roughly equivalent to bonds but suffer from limited availability.

A well constructed portfolio of the above instruments can yield 7 to 10 per cent without taking substantial capital, credit or inflation risk.

Richard Simmons is an Investment Manager with Credo Capital. He manages portfolios over £500,000 on a discretionary basis. The views expressed here are his own.

Editor's Picks

Loading...

Videos from BNY Mellon Investment Management

Loading...

Data provided by FE fundinfo. Care has been taken to ensure that the information is correct, but FE fundinfo neither warrants, represents nor guarantees the contents of information, nor does it accept any responsibility for errors, inaccuracies, omissions or any inconsistencies herein. Past performance does not predict future performance, it should not be the main or sole reason for making an investment decision. The value of investments and any income from them can fall as well as rise.