Skip to the content

The 20 most-geared investment trusts

20 November 2012

Trusts that borrow heavily can significantly boost returns in rising markets, but this can backfire spectacularly if things take a turn for the worse.

By Joshua Ausden,

News Editor, FE Trustnet

The five crown-rated Edinburgh and Jupiter European Opportunities investment trusts are among the most highly geared equity portfolios in the AIC universe, according to research by Oriel Securities.

There are 20 pure equity trusts that have a gearing in excess of 12 per cent at present, two of which have a gearing of more than 20 per cent. 

Most highly geared equity trusts

Name Net leverage (%)
Merchants  25
Edinburgh Investment 22
Jupiter European Opportunities 19
Baillie Gifford Japan 18
Scottish Mortgage 17
Edinburgh Worldwide 16
Fidelity Japanese Values 16
JP Morgan Claverhouse  16
JP Morgan Global Emerging Markets Income  16
BlackRock Latin American 15
Fidelity China Special Situations 15
Foreign & Colonial 15
Henderson Opportunities 15
Perpetual Income & Growth 15
TR European Growth 14
Invesco Income Growth 13
Lowland 13
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon 12
Edinburgh Dragon 12
Schroder Japan Growth 12

Source: Oriel

For investors who are bullish on a particular sector or manager, a trust that is highly leveraged may be an attractive prospect – particularly if the portfolio is also on a discount.

Gearing, which is also referred to as leveraging, is when a trust borrows money so that it can make a higher-conviction call on an investment. This method magnifies gains or losses, depending on whether the trust does well or badly. 

Simon Gergel’s £553m Merchants Trust is the most highly geared [25 per cent], followed by Neil Woodford’s Edinburgh Investment Trust [22 per cent].

Woodford’s portfolio has long-standing debentures that were taken out in the late 1980s and early 1990s, which goes some way to explaining why its level of gearing is so high. 

The Merchants Trust's board normally maintains a relatively high level of gearing as well. 

The most heavily geared Japanese trusts are Baillie Gifford Japan at 18 per cent, Fidelity Japanese Values at 16 per cent and Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon at 12 per cent of net asset value (NAV). 

Anthony Bolton’s Fidelity China Special Situations remains relatively highly leveraged at 15 per cent. 

Given the poor performance of the trust in recent months, this position has compounded losses: according to FE data, it is down 23.33 per cent since its launch in April 2010, compared with -5.17 per cent from its MSCI China benchmark. 

Performance of trust vs index since launch

ALT_TAG 

Source: FE Analytics

Darwall’s Jupiter European Opportunities trust is 19 per cent geared. Unlike Bolton’s portfolio, this move has boosted performance in recent months, thanks to the manager’s successful stock selection. 

According to FE data, his portfolio is up 50.47 per cent over one year, compared with 13.38 per cent from its FTSE World Europe ex UK benchmark. 

Of those trusts with a multi-asset focus, Scottish American and British Assets stand out as the most heavily geared, although much of the money they have borrowed is invested in assets other than equities.

Performance of trust vs index over 1-yr

ALT_TAG

Source: FE Analytics

Scottish American IT has net leverage of 26 per cent, primarily invested in property and bonds.

Similarly, British Assets shows net leverage of 20 per cent, with much of this invested in fixed interest, and equity leverage only accounting for 5 per cent. 

The majority of trusts on the list are currently on a discount, including Merchants, which is trading at -4 per cent to NAV, Edinburgh Dragon, which is trading on -10.7 per cent, and Fidelity Japanese Value, which is on -15.2 per cent. 

Editor's Picks

Loading...

Videos from BNY Mellon Investment Management

Loading...

Data provided by FE fundinfo. Care has been taken to ensure that the information is correct, but FE fundinfo neither warrants, represents nor guarantees the contents of information, nor does it accept any responsibility for errors, inaccuracies, omissions or any inconsistencies herein. Past performance does not predict future performance, it should not be the main or sole reason for making an investment decision. The value of investments and any income from them can fall as well as rise.