Skip to the content

Terry Smith: ‘No amount of recovery or low valuation will turn a poor business into a good one’

11 August 2021

Fundsmith Equity manager Terry Smith, who was under media scrutiny earlier in the year for outflows, showed that his fund is still as consistent as ever.

By Abraham Darwyne,

Senior reporter, Trustnet

Terry Smith has debunked the great value rotation of 2021 by pointing to Fundsmith Equity’s performance this year against its value peers, while defending his fund from commentators that had written it off.

In his semi-annual letter to shareholders, the FE fundinfo Alpha Manager dismissed the narrative that there was ever a rotation out of quality into value stocks.

He admitted that investors could have made good gains by buying value or recovery stocks at the bottom but noted that holding the same stocks during both the downturn and recovery would have underperformed his own portfolio significantly.

The manager compared the performance of his fund and the value index during the Covid crash, during the subsequent recovery up until the end of June 2021, and the performance over both periods.

Fundsmith Equity fell 21% from its highs during the Covid crash, whilst the S&P 500 Value index fell 37%. The value index then rallied 79% from the bottom whilst Terry Smith’s portfolio rallied 59%.

Smith highlighted how from the pre-Covid highs to the first half of 2021, Fundsmith Equity delivered 25% versus 12% from the value index.

“There are several lessons to be learnt from this, not the least of which is that no amount of recovery or low valuation will turn a poor business into a good one and quality is the main determinant of long-term performance,” he said.

However, Smith admitted that there had been a shift as markets started to sense an end to the economic disruption caused by the lockdowns in the final quarter of 2020.

“In such a situation our fund is always likely to underperform for a period, after all the companies we invest in mostly have little or nothing to recover from,” he said.

But Smith cautioned against investors who try to time the value or recovery trade by highlighting the performance of the S&P 500 Value index relative to his own portfolio.

He also pointed to articles written this year that had highlighted significant outflows from his flagship fund in the spring, at the height of the value rotation.

“If you have been reading what investment commentators have been saying during this period you might be rather surprised that our fund has fared so well,” he said. “You might even be surprised that we are still here.”

Although £130m was withdrawn from the fund in net outflows over the first six months of the year, he said the £3bn rise in the value of the fund “dwarfed” this.

“However, I am not expecting these facts to produce a change of heart amongst some commentators. As I believe former German Chancellor Helmut Kohl said: ‘Nothing so disappoints deserting rats as a ship which refuses to sink’.”

Fundsmith Equity is up 16.9% compared to 14.6% from the MSCI World Index, 12.7% from the FTSE 100 and 12.2% from the average IA Global peer so far this year.

Performance of the fund year-to-date

Source: FE Analytics

Some of the biggest contributors to the fund in the first half of the year were PayPal, Microsoft and IDEXX, which accounted for 1.8%, 1.5% and 1.4% of the fund’s performance respectively.

Over the past decade, Fundsmith Equity has delivered top-quartile returns of 539%, compared to 277.8% from the MSCI World Index and 225.7% from the average IA Global peer.

Fundsmith’s semi-annual report noted a 2.69% portfolio turnover and voluntary dealing costs of 0.005% which combined with an OCF of 1.05% amounted to a total cost of 1.06%.

Editor's Picks

Loading...

Videos from BNY Mellon Investment Management

Loading...

Data provided by FE fundinfo. Care has been taken to ensure that the information is correct, but FE fundinfo neither warrants, represents nor guarantees the contents of information, nor does it accept any responsibility for errors, inaccuracies, omissions or any inconsistencies herein. Past performance does not predict future performance, it should not be the main or sole reason for making an investment decision. The value of investments and any income from them can fall as well as rise.