Connecting: 3.144.176.149
Forwarded: 3.144.176.149, 104.23.197.12:65142
Anniversary celebrations for Jupiter and JOHCM funds | Trustnet Skip to the content

Anniversary celebrations for Jupiter and JOHCM funds

01 June 2011

Trustnet examines the performance of vehicles that have reached the three-year mark this month.

By Joshua Ausden,

Reporter, Financial Express

Of all the funds that are set to celebrate their third anniversary this month, Jupiter Strategic Bond and JOHCM UK Dynamic have delivered investors the best returns, according to research from Financial Express.

In an otherwise mediocre month for three-year anniversary funds, both vehicles outperformed their respective sector average by more than 26 per cent.

Performance of funds vs sector over 3-yrs

Fund Sector
Returns relative to sector (%)
Jupiter Strategic Bond Sterling Strategic Bond  26.36
JOHCM UK Dynamic UK All Companies  26.09
Franklin Templeton Global Total Return Bond Global Bonds  15.22
Baillie Giff Emerging Markets Bond Global Bonds  2.45
Franklin Templeton Strategic Bond Sterling Strategic Bond  -4.33
Aviva Inv Asia Pacific Property Property  -8.94
Skandia Alternative Investments Absolute Return  -9.4
Investec Africa & Middle East Specialist  N/A

Source: Financial Express Analytics

Ariel Bezalel’s £408m Jupiter Strategic Bond fund tops the list with returns of 46.06 per cent over three years. The average fund in its IMA Sterling Strategic Bond sector only returned 19.73 per cent over this period, although Bezalel’s vehicle has been around 2.5 per cent more volatile.

Trustnet Alpha Manager Alex Savvides' JOHCM UK Dynamic fund has returned 40.77 per cent since it was launched in June 2008, compared with 14.68 per cent from the average IMA UK All Companies fund.

Performance of funds vs sectors over 3-yrs


ALT_TAG

Source: Financial Express Analytics

Franklin Templeton Global Total Return Bond and Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets Bond have outperformed their IMA Global Bonds sector by 15.22 and 2.45 per cent respectively. However, both are substantially more volatile than their sector average.

The performance of Investec Africa & Middle East, which has returned 12.31 per cent since inception, is more difficult to measure. The fund sits in the IMA Specialist sector, and has no official benchmark.

Manager Roelof Horne would count JPM Africa Equity and Fidelity Emerging Europe Middle East Africa as his biggest competitors. Both funds have substantially outperformed Investec Africa & Middle East, albeit with more volatility.

The biggest margin of underperformance relative to sector has come from Skandia Alternative Investments. The £63.9m fund, which sits in the Absolute Return sector, has lost investors 0.2 per cent since it was launched three years ago.

By definition, an absolute return vehicle is supposed to break even at the very minimum, regardless of market condition.

The average Absolute Return fund has returned 9.29 per cent in the same period, with slightly lower volatility.

Although John Beck’s Franklin Templeton Strategic Bond has underperformed IMA Sterling Strategic Bond by more than three per cent since inception, it has been vastly less volatile than its sector, and lost less money in the fourth quarter of 2008 and first quarter of 2009.

Performance of fund vs sector over 3-yrs

ALT_TAG

Source: Financial Express Analytics

Daniel McDonald’s £176.7m Aviva Investments Asia Pacific Property fund has the second highest assets under management (AUM) of any fund set to attain a three-year track record this month.

After strong performance in the third and fourth quarter of 2008, the fund has struggled to match the performance of the average IMA Property fund. McDonald’s product is also more volatile than its sector over three years.

Editor's Picks

Loading...

Videos from BNY Mellon Investment Management

Loading...

Data provided by FE fundinfo. Care has been taken to ensure that the information is correct, but FE fundinfo neither warrants, represents nor guarantees the contents of information, nor does it accept any responsibility for errors, inaccuracies, omissions or any inconsistencies herein. Past performance does not predict future performance, it should not be the main or sole reason for making an investment decision. The value of investments and any income from them can fall as well as rise.