Connecting: 216.73.216.49
Forwarded: 216.73.216.49, 104.23.243.243:29803
Worst-performing funds exposed | Trustnet Skip to the content

Worst-performing funds exposed

08 February 2012

Darius McDermott is urging investors who own any of the funds named in Chelsea Financial’s DropZone to sell them as quickly as possible.

By Joshua Ausden,

Reporter, FE Trustnet

Four of the 10 funds that have underperformed the most over three years sit in the Mixed Investment 20-60% Shares sector, according to Chelsea Financial's "DropZone".

The list of 10 includes the Aberforth UK Small Companies and L&G Equity funds, which have more than £100m assets under management (AUM).

The study looked at all the funds in the IMA unit trust and OEIC universe and compared returns with the funds’ sector average.

Andy McCarthy’s Barmac The Castleton Growth fund was revealed as the worst overall, underperforming its sector by 35.71 per cent in the three years to 1 January 2011. According to FE Analytics data, it is the worst-performing Mixed Investment 20-60% Shares fund over both one and three years.

Biggest underperformers over 3-yrs


Name
3-yr underperformance from sector average (%)
Barmac - The Castleton Growth
35.71
L&G - UK Special Situations
31.25
Marlborough - Far East Growth
28.27
Aberforth - UK Small Companies
24.21
L&G - Equity
23.81
Neptune - Cautious Managed
22.79
Jupiter - Undervalued Assets
22.27
F&C - Blue
21.41
SVM - Global Opportunities
21.38
Insight - Diversified High Income
21.13

Source: Chelsea Financial

Darius McDermott, managing director of Chelsea Financial, recommends investors rid their portfolios of these underperformers.

"The 10 funds that find themselves in the inaugural first edition of the DropZone have underperformed their sector averages by a staggering 21 to 35 per cent over the last three years," he said.

"What I find most frightening is that [nearly] half of the funds are from the old Cautious Managed sector. That a sector of funds deemed to be of limited risk can underperform by such a huge amount is simply unacceptable."

"Even more troubling is the fact that this sector has been one of the most popular among investors over the last few years, suggesting a large number of people could be holding dud funds in their portfolios."

According to data from the Investment Management Association (IMA), the Mixed Investment 20-60% Shares sector has been the best seller in five of the last eight quarters.

"The list also includes funds from some of the top investment houses, including Jupiter's Undervalued Assets and Neptune's Cautious Managed," continued McDermott.

"Jupiter has finally taken action and just announced that they are putting in place a new manager to turn the fund around [Steve Davies]. Neptune surprises us as the fund is run by Robin Geffen, a manager with an excellent track record on other funds. It appears he was simply too cautious, as a high allocation to cash in 2009 and 2010 meant he missed the market rally, just proving that risk isn't all about high allocation to equities."

Editor's Picks

Loading...

Videos from BNY Mellon Investment Management

Loading...

Data provided by FE fundinfo. Care has been taken to ensure that the information is correct, but FE fundinfo neither warrants, represents nor guarantees the contents of information, nor does it accept any responsibility for errors, inaccuracies, omissions or any inconsistencies herein. Past performance does not predict future performance, it should not be the main or sole reason for making an investment decision. The value of investments and any income from them can fall as well as rise.