Connecting: 216.73.216.72
Forwarded: 216.73.216.72, 104.23.197.205:41228
Lowcock: Timing the market could cost you £50k | Trustnet Skip to the content

Lowcock: Timing the market could cost you £50k

31 August 2013

Hargreaves Lansdown’s Adrian Lowcock says one well-known saying that involves selling everything in May and re-investing after the summer volatility has depressed prices is well past its use-by date.

By Adrian Lowcock,

Hargreaves Lansdown


Selling in May is a costly strategy

The old adage suggests investors should sell in May, go away and come back on St Leger's Day. Over the longer term this has proved to be a costly strategy that would have disappointed investors.

ALT_TAG According to research by Hargreaves Lansdown, selling in May and buying back after St Leger's Day, or 16 September, would have left investors in the FTSE 100 better in only four of the last 10 years (from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2012).


Buy and hold is a more effective strategy


Further analysis shows that following the old adage could actually be extremely damaging to your wealth.

A buy-and-hold investor with £100,000 in the FTSE 100 on 1 January 2003 would have made £47,627 more than an investor who sold on 1 May each year and bought back on 16 September for 10 years. The table below shows the difference in returns.

Impact on portfolio of using the St Leger's strategy

Investment Buy and Hold* Sell in May** Difference
£10,000 £21,517 £16,754 £4,763
£50,000 £107,583 £83,770 £23,813
£100,000 £215,166 £167,539 £47,627

Source: Hargreaves Lansdown

  • A buy and hold strategy produced an average annual return of 9.11 per cent on the FTSE 100 from 2003 to 2012. Selling in May and buying back on St Leger's Day would have reduced this return by more than one-third, to an annual average of 5.59 per cent.
  • In 2009, a sell in May strategy would have returned 5.52 per cent, missing out on most of the recovery as the FTSE All Share returned 30.12 per cent that year. 

The table below shows the annualised returns of the FTSE 100 using a buy and hold strategy versus selling in May and buying back on St Leger's Day.
Buy and hold vs sell in May

Year Buy and hold annual return* Sell in May annual return**
2003 17.89% 4.94%
2004 11.25% 7.97%
2005 20.78% 5.66%
2006 14.43% 15.01%
2007 7.36% 7.89%
2008 -28.33% -15.03%
2009 27.33% 3.73%
2010 12.62% 10.96%
2011 -2.18% 8.67%
2012 9.97% 6.12%

Source: Hargreaves Lansdown, Lipper Hindsight

*Investment held from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2012

**Investment is sold each year, from 2003 until 2013, on 1 May and reinvested on 16 September


Is "sell in May" working this year?


The strategy does not seem to be working this year either. From 1 May to 22 August, the FTSE 100 and FTSE All Share are up 1.36 per cent and 2.17 per cent respectively, meaning investors would have been better off staying invested. There are still 14 more trading days to go before St Leger's Day.
 
Performance of indices since 1 May

ALT_TAG

Source: FE Analytics

Over 10 years the results are conclusive: trying to predict when markets will rise or fall is a very dangerous and potentially costly strategy. Far too much time is spent on trying to anticipate when you should buy and sell investments. It is much better for your financial wealth to adopt a buy-and-hold strategy and invest for the longer term.

Investors should think about fundamentals rather than trying to pick the right day to invest. I recommend concentrating on finding the best managers to run your portfolio. If investors are nervous about market volatility, they should consider drip-feeding money in through a regular savings plan to give them some peace of mind.

Adrian Lowcock is a senior investment manager at Hargreaves Lansdown. The views expressed here are his own. 
ALT_TAG

Editor's Picks

Loading...

Videos from BNY Mellon Investment Management

Loading...

Data provided by FE fundinfo. Care has been taken to ensure that the information is correct, but FE fundinfo neither warrants, represents nor guarantees the contents of information, nor does it accept any responsibility for errors, inaccuracies, omissions or any inconsistencies herein. Past performance does not predict future performance, it should not be the main or sole reason for making an investment decision. The value of investments and any income from them can fall as well as rise.