Connecting: 3.15.26.71
Forwarded: 3.15.26.71, 172.70.178.142:15098
Juggling cyclicals and defensives in the current environment | Trustnet Skip to the content

Juggling cyclicals and defensives in the current environment

20 September 2010

Managers express opposing views on dropping cyclical stocks in favour of more defensive holdings.

By Cherry Reynard,

Trustnet Correspondent

It is increasingly difficult to find a fund manager with anything good to say about cyclical companies. Increasingly, the majority of fund managers are positioning their portfolios to a similar group of large cap, high yielding defensives.

The theory is that double dip or no double dip, the developed world is in a slow-growth environment for the foreseeable future. Markets are extrapolating growth rates from cyclical stocks such as mining equivalent to their levels in 2009. These stocks are therefore expensive and to be avoided.
ALT_TAG
This is bread and butter for IMA UK Equity Income managers such as Neil Woodford (pictured right), or Tony Nutt. But this is spreading to the UK All Companies sector.

Among the high profile backers of defensive stocks is Stephen Anness, manager of the Invesco Perpetual UK Aggressive fund, who said: “We are still very cautious about the outlook. Also, there has been a large valuation compression, with lots of stocks trading on broadly similar multiples. Investors have gone for all defensive or all cyclical without differentiating between good and bad companies. This is the opportunity – at the moment, there is no premium for high quality companies.”

He believes that large caps have been the victim of the selling of UK equities over the last 20 years. He points to a recent survey suggesting that UK institutional holdings have gone from 62 per cent in 1992 to 17 per cent today.

Derek Stuart, Trustnet Alpha Manager of the Artemis UK Special Situations fund, has been consistently underweight mining stocks in his fund. He says that the market is now extrapolating too high a margin for these and other cyclical companies, basing earnings on a strong rebound year in 2009 that is unlikely to be repeated.

But despite this high profile backing, the outlook for value stocks may not be as clear-cut as it seems. The resurgence of value after 18 months of underperformance was also a common theme at the start of this year. Since then it has, surprisingly, been small caps that have outperformed. In the UK All Companies sector the top funds year-to-date have all tended to have a small cap focus: Unicorn Outstanding British Companies, Manek Growth, F&C UK Mid Cap, Allianz RCM UK Mid Cap and Liontrust First Opportunities

Top sector performers, year-to-date

 ALT_TAG

Jane Coffey (pictured right), head of UK Equities at Royal London Asset Management, makes the case for cyclical companies. She said: “The global recovery will ALT_TAGbe led by emerging markets, which will have a significant effect on commodities prices. Therefore we are more positive on resources and industrial companies.”

However, she adds that she is generally underweight financial cyclicals, where she does not see significant upside.

There have been some signs over the past few months that the value argument may be winning out. The gap between the performance of the value-heavy IMA Equity Income sector compared to the more cyclical UK All Companies sector on a year-to-date basis has narrowed.

The average equity income fund is now up 7.1 per cent, compared to 7.6 per cent for the UK All Companies sector. These year-to-date figures take into account the deleterious effect of the BP disaster on many UK Equity funds. The two sectors are equal over three months, in spite of a stronger September for the UK All Companies sector.

The ultimate winner is likely to depend on the relative strength of global economic recovery. Cyclical companies may still move up faster if recovery surprises on the upside, particularly in emerging markets. China has bounced back from earlier weakness, so this remains a possibility. On the other hand, defensives look historically cheap, are subject to diminishing sell pressure and have attractive dividends. However, the high profile backers should not blind investors to the other side of the story.

Editor's Picks

Loading...

Videos from BNY Mellon Investment Management

Loading...

Data provided by FE fundinfo. Care has been taken to ensure that the information is correct, but FE fundinfo neither warrants, represents nor guarantees the contents of information, nor does it accept any responsibility for errors, inaccuracies, omissions or any inconsistencies herein. Past performance does not predict future performance, it should not be the main or sole reason for making an investment decision. The value of investments and any income from them can fall as well as rise.