Connecting: 216.73.216.94
Forwarded: 216.73.216.94, 104.23.197.13:31128
Cheap funds beat expensive rivals on all fronts | Trustnet Skip to the content

Cheap funds beat expensive rivals on all fronts

31 January 2013

The eroding impact of charges on returns means investors would be better off backing those with the lowest TER in the vast majority of cases.

By Alex Paget,

Reporter, FE Trustnet

Funds with a lower total expensive ratio (TER) consistently outperform their more expensive rivals across the majority of IMA sectors, according to the latest FE Trustnet study.

The research compared the performance of funds that are bottom decile for cost against those that are top decile, and found that the cheaper funds come out on top over three- and five-year periods in almost every equity, bond and multi-asset sector.

All trackers and institutionally focused funds were discounted from the results, as were the specialist sectors.

One of the best examples of the trend is in the popular IMA UK Equity Income sector.

According to FE data, the average bottom-decile fund for cost has returned 46.77 per cent over the last five years, almost tripling the returns of those that are top decile.

Performance of portfolios vs sector over 5yrs

ALT_TAG

Source: FE Analytics

The cheaper funds have also considerably outperformed their sector average over that time, while the more expensive vehicles have fallen short by more than 10 percentage points.

The margin of outperformance is smaller over three years, but still significant: the cheaper portfolio has returned 46.29 per cent over this period, compared with 30 per cent from the more expensive one.

UK Equity Income funds with a lower TER also have a considerably lower annualised volatility than the more expensive funds over both of these periods.

Among the list of cheap funds is FE Alpha Manager Francis Brooke’s Trojan Income, as well as PFS Chelverton UK Equity Income. They have a TER of 1.05 and 1.25 per cent, respectively.

Notable funds in the expensive list are Neil Woodford’s SJP UK High Income, which has a TER of 1.84 per cent, and Standard Life UK Equity Income Unconstrained, which has a TER of 1.91 per cent.

Cheaper funds also came out on top in the IMA UK All Companies, Global, Asia Pacific ex Japan, North American and various bond and multi-asset sectors.

Performance of portfolios over 5-yrs


Name 3yrs (%) 5yrs (%)
Cheap UK All Companies funds 36.06 30.24
Expensive UK All Companies funds 31.69 20.6



Cheap Global funds 30.62 29.89
Expensive Global funds 25.45 20.72



Cheap Asia Pac funds 34.08 44.23
Expensive Asia Pac funds 31.93 36.54



Cheap Strategic Bond funds 23.4 32.04
Expensive Strategic Bond funds 15.34 24.54



Cheap Mixed 20-60% funds 23.05 25.37
Expensive Mixed 20-60% funds 15.21 14.76

Source: FE Analytics


Whitechurch’s Ben Willis says he is not surprised by the results, as higher costs erode returns – particularly over the long-term. However, he believes it would be wrong to automatically dismiss expensive funds.

ALT_TAG "It’s very interesting to see and it shows that the more expensive a fund’s TER, the more this drags on its performance," he said.

"Obviously, there are going to be more experienced managers who have traditionally performed well – they might have higher TERs but have managed to negate that expense by beating their peer group."

"For instance, Richard Buxton’s funds' TERs are usually quite expensive but I would expect him to perform very well over five years."

Schroder UK Alpha Plus’ TER of 1.66 per cent is above that of the sector average. However, the fund has been a top-quartile performer in its IMA UK All Companies sector over three, five and 10 years.

"The most I would be prepared to put up for a fund, the absolute maxim, is around 1.5 per cent," Willis added.

"I would only break that rule if I were buying a manager who has posted consistent and stellar returns over a long period of time – such as Nigel Thomas. He is the type of manager who has outperformed over almost every time period."

The five crown-rated AXA Framlington UK Select Opportunities fund has a TER of 1.55 per cent.

Like Buxton’s portfolio, it has been a top-quartile performer in IMA UK All Companies over three, five and 10 years.

The only sector where expensive funds consistently come out on top is in IMA UK Smaller Companies – an area of the market that requires greater research than those with a larger cap focus such as IMA UK Equity Income.

Performance of portfolios vs sector over 5-yrs

Name 3yrs (%) 5yrs (%)
Cheap UK Smaller Cos funds 56.45 48.61
Expensive UK Smaller Cos funds 61.03 57.31

Source: FE Analytics

The five crown-rated Fidelity UK Smaller Companies and Old Mutual Dublin UK Select Smaller Companies funds are both in the top decile for cost. They have a TER of 1.72 and 1.94 per cent respectively.

Editor's Picks

Loading...

Videos from BNY Mellon Investment Management

Loading...

Data provided by FE fundinfo. Care has been taken to ensure that the information is correct, but FE fundinfo neither warrants, represents nor guarantees the contents of information, nor does it accept any responsibility for errors, inaccuracies, omissions or any inconsistencies herein. Past performance does not predict future performance, it should not be the main or sole reason for making an investment decision. The value of investments and any income from them can fall as well as rise.